Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.

PURPOSE: We provide current information on the use of PSA testing for the evaluation of men at risk for prostate cancer, and the risks and benefits of early detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The report is a summary of the American Urological Association PSA Best Practice Policy 2009. The summary statement is based on a review of the current professional literature, clinical experience and the expert opinions of a multispecialty panel. It is intended to serve as a resource for physicians, other health care professionals, and patients. It does not establish a fixed set of guidelines, define the legal standard of care or pre-empt physician judgment in individual cases. RESULTS: There are two notable differences in the current policy. First, the age for obtaining a baseline PSA has been lowered to 40 years. Secondly, the current policy no longer recommends a single, threshold value of PSA, which should prompt prostate biopsy. Rather, the decision to proceed to prostate biopsy should be based primarily on PSA and DRE results, but should take into account multiple factors including free and total PSA, patient age, PSA velocity, PSA density, family history, ethnicity, prior biopsy history and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Although recently published trials show different results regarding the impact of prostate cancer screening on mortality, both suggest that prostate cancer screening leads to overdetection and overtreatment of some patients. Therefore, men should be informed of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening before biopsy and the option of active surveillance in lieu of immediate treatment for certain men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.

PURPOSE: We provide current information on the use of PSA testing for the evaluation of men at risk for prostate cancer, and the risks and benefits of early detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The report is a summary of the American Urological Association PSA Best Practice Policy 2009. The summary statement is based on a review of the current professional literature, clinical experience and the expert opinions of a multispecialty panel. It is intended to serve as a resource for physicians, other health care professionals, and patients. It does not establish a fixed set of guidelines, define the legal standard of care or pre-empt physician judgment in individual cases. RESULTS: There are two notable differences in the current policy. First, the age for obtaining a baseline PSA has been lowered to 40 years. Secondly, the current policy no longer recommends a single, threshold value of PSA, which should prompt prostate biopsy. Rather, the decision to proceed to prostate biopsy should be based primarily on PSA and DRE results, but should take into account multiple factors including free and total PSA, patient age, PSA velocity, PSA density, family history, ethnicity, prior biopsy history and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Although recently published trials show different results regarding the impact of prostate cancer screening on mortality, both suggest that prostate cancer screening leads to overdetection and overtreatment of some patients. Therefore, men should be informed of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening before biopsy and the option of active surveillance in lieu of immediate treatment for certain men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

The effects of a presurgical stress management intervention for men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE This study assessed the short-term and long-term efficacy of a presurgical stress management intervention at reducing mood disturbance and improving quality of life (QOL) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred fifty-nine men were randomly assigned to a two-session (plus two boosters) presurgical stress management intervention (SM), a two-session (plus two boosters) supportive attention group (SA), or a standard care group (SC). Assessments occurred 1 month before surgery; 1 week before surgery; the morning of surgery; 6 weeks after surgery, and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results Results indicated significant group differences in mood disturbance before surgery (P = .02), such that men in the SM group had significantly less mood disturbance than men in the SC group (P = .006), with no significant differences between the SM and SA or SA and SC groups. In the year after surgery, there were significant group differences on Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores (P = .004); men in the SM group had significantly higher PCS scores than men in the SC group (P = .0009), and there were no significant differences between the SM and SA or SA and SC groups. There were no group effects on prostate-specific QOL or SF-36 mental health scores. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate the efficacy of a brief presurgical stress management intervention in improving some short-term and long-term outcomes. If these results are replicated, it may be a useful adjunct to standard care for men with prostate cancer undergoing surgery.

Comparison of cancers detected at only a sextant or alternative location.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the tumour-positive biopsy site at extended biopsy on tumour volume and potential biological significance of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated radical prostatectomy specimens from 247 consecutive men diagnosed with prostate cancer by extended biopsy. Men who had both a positive sextant and alternative site were excluded, resulting in 132 evaluable men. We assessed age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, pathological stage, Gleason score, total tumour volume, and location (sextant or alternative site) of the positive biopsy. Patients were grouped by location of the positive biopsy, i.e. sextant site only or alternative site only, including anterior horn, midline region and transition zone. RESULTS: A biopsy from a sextant-only or an alternative site only was positive in 42% (56/132) and 58% (76/132) of men, respectively. There was no significant difference in PSA level, number of positive cores, pathological stage, Gleason score, total tumour volume or the incidence of low-volume/low-grade cancer (volume <0.5 mL and a Gleason score of

A randomized prospective trial evaluating testosterone, haemoglobin kinetics and quality of life, during and after 12 months of androgen deprivation after prostatectomy: results from the Postoperative Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess testosterone and haemoglobin kinetics in the Postoperative Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation (PAAD) trial, and correlate these with quality of life (QoL) in this prospective randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients met the criteria for high-risk cancer after RRP (Gleason score > or = 8, pT3c or Gleason score 7 concomitant with pT3a/b and positive surgical margins) and were prospectively randomized to either observation or AD for 12 months. Haemoglobin and testosterone levels were determined and QoL surveyed at regular intervals for 24 months. RESULTS: Serum testosterone levels were castrate in 19 of 21 treated patients at 3 months and all at 6 months after starting AD. Levels failed to return to normal at 6 months after stopping treatment in six of 16 (38%) patients, and at 12 months in three of 17 (18%). AD caused a delay in the recovery of haemoglobin levels to normal after RRP. There was no statistically significant decline in the Short Form-36 QoL score with AD. Scores on the University of California-Los Angeles Sexual Functioning Scale were decreased during AD, but returned to a level not statistically significantly different from controls after stopping treatment. CONCLUSION: A year of adjuvant AD after RRP affected serum haemoglobin, testosterone and sexual function reversibly, with return to control levels within the subsequent year in most patients. No significant effect on overall QoL with AD was detected in the study.

African-American men with nonpalpable prostate cancer exhibit greater tumor volume than matched white men.

BACKGROUND: Although prostate cancer (PC) mortality disproportionately affects African-American (AA) men, limited data exist comparing the pathologic characteristics of white and AA patients with nonpalpable PC (clinical stage T1c). METHODS: The authors reviewed the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens from 37 consecutive AA men with clinical stage T1c PC and 35 white men who were matched for age, clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, year of surgery, prostate weight, and prostate biopsy strategy. Pathologic characteristics were compared after mapping tumor foci and calculating tumor volumes by using computer software. RESULTS: For AA men, the median age (57.7 years), mean serum PSA level (9.3 ng/mL), mean prostate weight (43 g), and biopsy strategy (73% sextant) were matched with the cohort of 35 white men (median age, 57.1 years; mean PSA, 9.3 ng/mL;, mean prostate weight, 43 g; biopsy strategy, 66% sextant). Despite similar biopsy characteristics between the 2 groups (Gleason score > or =7 in 43% of AA men vs. 37% of white men), AA men exhibited significantly higher prostatectomy Gleason scores (> or =7 in 76% of AA men vs. 34% of white men; P = .01). AA men also had a higher mean tumor volume (1.82 cm3 vs. 0.72 cm3; P = .001) and had 2.8 times more tumor per ng/mL of serum PSA (0.22 cm3 per ng/mL vs. 0.079 cm3 per ng/mL; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a cohort of white men with similar clinical features at the time of biopsy, AA men with nonpalpable PC had higher prostatectomy Gleason scores, greater cancer volume, and greater tumor volume per ng/mL of serum PSA. These data provide additional support for the concept of early PC detection using a serum PSA threshold of 2.5 ng/mL for biopsy among AA men.

Impact of fellowship training on pathologic outcomes and complication rates of radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the results of radical prostatectomy (RP) performed by fellowship-trained surgeons in the first year of independent practice. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 66 men who underwent RP performed by 2 recently graduated fellowship-trained surgeons (C.J.R., n = 27; A.M.K., n = 39) in their first year of independent practice was undertaken. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Median follow-up of the cohort is 12.5 months. RESULTS: The median patient age was 61.2 +/- 6.9 years (range, 44-74 years), the median prostate-specific antigen level was 5 ng/mL (range, 1.2-39.4 ng/mL), and the median prostate biopsy-determined Gleason score was 7. Of the 66 men, 25 (38%) underwent a bilateral nerve-sparing RP, 20 (30%) underwent a unilateral nerve-sparing RP, and 21 (32%) underwent a nonnerve-sparing procedure. Forty-two men (63%) underwent a pelvic lymph node dissection. The median operative time was 201 minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 734 mL (range, 300-1600 mL). There were 4 major complications--a pulmonary embolism in 3 patients and an intraoperative rectal injury in 1. Pathologic classification was as follows: pT2, 74%; pT3a, 23%; pT3b, 2%; and pN+, 2%. The positive margin rate was 14% overall and only 2% in men with pT2 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Results of RP performed by fellowship-trained surgeons in their first year of practice compare favorably with results of RP in a large series reported by more experienced surgeons. Being trained in an environment where an experienced surgeon serves as first assistant to the trainee appears to abbreviate the learning curve associated with this procedure.

Demographic and past screening behaviors of men attending a free community screening program for prostate cancer.

This study characterizes demographic and past prostate screening behaviors of men who participated in a free screening for prostate cancer. Demographics, past prostate screening behavior, perceived risk, and cancer worry were assessed in 1,680 men. Mean age was 58.2 years, 56% were White, and 76% had health insurance. Men with insurance were more likely to have had a previous prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and digital rectal exam (DRE). White men were more likely to have had a previous PSA and DRE and to have discussed PSA testing with a physician than African American men. African American men reported greater perceived risk and more worry than White men. Screening differences between African American and White men were explained by insurance status. These results may help guide the development of and promotion for future screening programs. Future efforts should be directed at increasing awareness about screening procedures for prostate cancer.

Obesity, weight gain, and risk of biochemical failure among prostate cancer patients following prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Several lines of evidence suggest that diet and weight gain may be important environmental factors implicated in prostate carcinogenesis, especially in tumor progression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity at different ages in a well-characterized cohort of prostate cancer patients treated with prostatectomy and to develop a prognostic model that incorporates body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We carried out a prospective study of 526 patients registered at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1992 to 2001. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were done. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 54 months, 97 (18%) post-prostatectomy patients experienced biochemical failure. Patients who were obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) at diagnosis had a higher rate of biochemical failure than nonobese men (P = 0.07). Those obese at 40 years had an even greater rate of biochemical failure (P = 0.001). Higher BMI at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR), 1.07; P = 0.01] and Gleason score = 7(4 + 3) and > or =8 (HR, 3.9; P = 0.03 and HR, 10.0; P < or = 0.001, respectively) remained significant independent predictors of biochemical failure in multivariate analysis. Men who gained weight at the greatest rate (>1.5 kg/y) between 25 years and diagnosis progressed significantly sooner (mean time, 17 months) than those who exhibited a slower weight gain (mean time, 39 months; P(trend) = 0.005). The inclusion of obesity to the clinical nomogram improved performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings validate the importance for a role of obesity in prostate cancer progression and suggest a link to the biological basis of prostate cancer progression that can be therapeutically exploited.

Outcome of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy with or without hormonal therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the outcome of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP). By comparing the outcomes for patients who received RT alone and for those who received combined RT and hormonal therapy, we assessed the potential benefits of hormonal therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cohort was comprised of 101 patients who received salvage RT between 1990 and 2001 for biochemical failure after RP. Fifty-nine of these patients also received hormone. Margin status (positive vs. negative), extracapsular extension (yes vs. no), seminal vesicle involvement (yes vs. no), pathologic stage, Gleason score, pre-RP PSA, post-RP PSA, pre-RT PSA, hormonal use, radiotherapy dose and technique, RP at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, and time from RP to salvage RT were analyzed. Statistically significant variables were used to construct prognostic groups. RESULTS: Independent prognostic factors for the RT-alone group were margin status and pre-RT PSA. RP at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center was marginally significant (p = 0.06) in multivariate analysis. Pre-RT PSA was the only significant prognostic factor for the combined-therapy group. We used a combination of margin status and pre-RT PSA to construct a prognostic model for response to the salvage treatment based on the RT group. We identified the favorable group as those patients with positive margin and pre-RT PSA < or = 0.5 ng/mL vs. the unfavorable group as otherwise. This stratification separates patients into clinically meaningful groups. The 5-year PSA control probabilities for the favorable vs. the unfavorable group were 83.7% vs. 61.7% with radiotherapy alone (p = 0.03). Androgen ablation seemed to be most beneficial in the unfavorable group. CONCLUSION: After prostatectomy, favorable-group patients may fare well with salvage radiotherapy alone. These patients may be spared the toxicity of androgen ablation. The other patients may benefit most from a combined approach with hormonal treatment. We further suggest that salvage radiotherapy should be given early when the PSA is still low.

Changes in serum proteomic patterns by presurgical alpha-tocopherol and L-selenomethionine supplementation in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the chemopreventive effects of the dietary antioxidants alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) and l-selenomethionine (selenium) comes from secondary analysis of two phase III clinical trials that found treatment with these antioxidants reduced the incidence of prostate cancer. To determine the effects of selenium and vitamin E in blood and prostate tissue, we undertook a preoperative feasibility study complementary to the currently ongoing Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with clinically localized prostate cancer enrolled on this 2 x 2 factorial design study were randomized to take selenium, vitamin E, both, or placebo for 3 to 6 weeks before prostatectomy. Sera were collected from patients before and after dietary supplementation. Thirty-nine patients were evaluable, and 29 age-matched disease-free men served as controls. Mass profiling of lipophilic serum proteins of lower molecular weight (2-13.5 kDa) was conducted, and mass spectra data were analyzed using custom-designed software. RESULTS: Weighted voting analyses showed a change in sera classification from cancerous to healthy for some patients with prostate cancer after dietary intervention. ANOVA analysis showed significantly different treatment effects on prediction strength changes among the four groups at a 95% confidence level. Eliminating an outlying value and performing post hoc analysis using Fisher's least significant difference method showed that effects in the group treated with the combination were significantly different from those of the other groups. CONCLUSION: In sera from patients with prostate cancer, selenium and vitamin E combined induced statistically significant proteomic pattern changes associated with prostate cancer-free status.

Efficacy of prostatic fossa biopsy in detecting local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate retrospectively the efficacy of prostatic fossa biopsy in detecting local recurrence of prostate cancer in men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Between January 1997 and December 2002, 100 men without prior adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostatic fossa. The TRUS findings, digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at TRUS, PSA velocity, and pathologic stage and Gleason score of the radical prostatectomy specimen were correlated with the biopsy results. RESULTS: Overall, 29 (29%) of the 100 men who underwent biopsy had documented local recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of DRE to detect biopsy-proven local recurrence was 72.4% and 64.8%, respectively. The corresponding values for TRUS were 86.2% and 53.5%. None of the men with a serum PSA concentration of less than 0.5 ng/mL at biopsy who had normal results for both TRUS and DRE had a biopsy-proven local recurrence. By stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, abnormal TRUS findings and serum PSA concentration at biopsy were independent predictors for positive fossa biopsy results. The combination of TRUS and serum PSA concentration was the best predictive model for a positive fossa biopsy result. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatic fossa biopsy should be avoided in patients with both or either normal DRE or TRUS findings when the PSA level is less than 0.5 ng/mL.

Relationship between plasma carotenoids and prostate cancer.

Carotenoids, particularly lycopene, are thought to decrease prostate cancer risk, but the relationship between plasma carotenoid concentrations and risk in various populations has not been well characterized. Comparing 118 non-Hispanic Caucasian men mainly from southeast Texas with nonmetastatic prostate cancer with 52 healthy men from the same area, we conducted a case-control analysis evaluating associations between risk and plasma levels of total carotenoids, beta-cryptoxanthin, alpha- and trans-beta-carotene, lutein and zeaxanthin, total lycopenes, trans-lycopene, total cis-lycopenes, and cis-lycopene isoforms 1, 2, 3, and 5. Risk for men with high plasma levels of alpha-carotene, trans-beta-carotene, beta-cryptoxanthin, and lutein and zeaxanthin was less than half that for those with lower levels. In contrast, we observed no significant associations for total lycopenes, all-trans-lycopene, and cis-lycopene isomer peaks 2, 3, and 5, although high levels of cis-lycopene isomer peak 1 were inversely associated with risk. Analysis of men with aggressive disease (Gleason scores of > or =7, n = 88) vs. less aggressive cases (Gleason scores of <7, n = 30) failed to reveal significant associations between carotenoid levels and the risk of diagnosis with aggressive disease. These findings suggest that, in these men, higher circulating levels of alpha-cryptoxanthin, alpha-carotene, trans-beta-carotene, and lutein and zeaxanthin may contribute to lower prostate cancer risk but not to disease progression.

Androgen receptor polymorphisms and risk of biochemical failure among prostatectomy patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of inherited genotypes in prostate cancer (PC) progression. This prospective study evaluated the predictive value of androgen receptor (AR) polymorphisms (CAG and GGC repeats) among prostatectomy patients. METHODS: We studied 354 patients registered at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1991 to 2001. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 56 months, 66 (19%) post-prostatectomy patients experienced biochemical failure (BF). Patients with higher CAG repeats (CAG > or = 24) had significantly longer BF-free survival (BFFS) than those with fewer repeats (CAG < or = 23) (P = 0.04). Higher CAG repeats were significantly associated with lower BF risk among Whites and African Americans. Among Whites, longer CAG repeats (relative risk (RR) = 0.45, P = 0.03) and Gleason score > or = 8 (RR = 19.33, P = 0.005) remained significant BFFS predictors in multivariate analysis. GGC repeats were not associated with BF. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that an inherited polymorphism (CAG repeats) in the AR is related to differences in genetic susceptibility to BF, supporting the hypothesis that increased AR activity may play a role in PC progression.

Volume indexes of total, free, and complexed prostate-specific antigen enhance prediction of extraprostatic disease extension in men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the ability of volume-adjusted total, complexed, and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to predict organ-confined cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients with nonpalpable disease. METHODS: Collected sera were assayed for total PSA (tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA), and free PSA (fPSA) in 78 men who underwent radical prostatectomy with nonpalpable prostate cancer. The pathologic results (organ-confined versus extraprostatic extension [EPE]), tPSA, cPSA, fPSA/tPSA ratio, cPSA/tPSA ratio, fPSA/cPSA ratio, tPSA density (tPSAD), cPSA density (cPSAD), and fPSA density (fPSAD) were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Fifteen men (19.2%) had pathologic EPE. After stratifying the patients on the basis of the Beckman tPSA, the cPSAD, tPSAD, and fPSAD were significant predictors of EPE when comparing their respective medians in individuals with tPSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL. Statistically significant differences were noted between patients with and without EPE for tPSAD (P = 0.0015), cPSAD (P = 0.0018), and fPSAD (P = 0.0022), but not for the fPSA/tPSA, cPSA/tPSA, and fPSA/cPSA ratios. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was similar for tPSA (0.539) and cPSA (0.542), as it was for tPSAD (0.708), cPSAD (0.700), and fPSAD (0.731). The specificity and diagnostic accuracy of tPSAD, cPSAD, and fPSAD were significantly greater than those of tPSA and cPSA (specificity P <0.001; diagnostic accuracy P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In men with nonpalpable prostate cancer, the density parameters of tPSA, cPSA, and fPSA performed equivalently and appeared to enhance the predictability of EPE.

Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a highly effective treatment for patients with prostate cancer. However, patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy have less than ideal outcomes with 5-year progression rates between 36% and 50%. Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is often advocated for improving these outcomes. We identified predictors of response to adjuvant RT given for positive margins after RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of men who underwent RP between 1987 and 1999 at our institution and who received adjuvant RT for positive surgical margins. Only patients in whom prostate specific antigen (PSA) was undetectable after RP as well as before the initiation of RT were included. Numerous clinicopathological variables, including pre-RP PSA, pathological stage, margin length and location, and extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement, were assessed for their adverse effect on the biochemical recurrence rate after adjuvant RT. RESULTS: A total of 62 men met our inclusion criteria. Median age at surgery was 60.7 +/- 6.1 years and median PSA at presentation was 9.0 ng/ml (range 1.4 to 64.9). The median RT dose was 60.0 +/- 3.6 Gy. RT was started a median of 5.0 +/- 3.6 months after RP. The 5 and 10-year biochemical disease-free survival rates for the whole group were 90.2% and 87.9%, respectively. Of all parameters tested only Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater (p = 0.037) and pre-RP PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml (p = 0.040) were predictive of biochemical recurrence after adjuvant RT on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis only pre-RP PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml remained an independent predictor (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of true adjuvant RT in patients with positive margins after RP and undetectable PSA those with predominant Gleason grade 4 or greater, or PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml at presentation are at increased risk for recurrence after adjuvant RT.

A neurocomputational model for prostate carcinoma detection.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for prostate carcinoma screening rely primarily on the digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA). Well described patient risk factors for prostate carcinoma also include age, ethnicity, family history, and complexed PSA. However, due to the nonlinear relation of each of these variables with prostate carcinoma, it is difficult to predict reliably each patient's risk based on linear univariate analysis. The authors investigated a neural network to model the risk of prostate carcinoma by seven readily available clinical features. METHODS: The database for the current study comprised 3268 men recently evaluated for the early detection of prostate carcinoma. The seven clinical features evaluated included age, race, family history, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), DRE, and total and complexed PSA. Three hundred forty-eight subjects in the dataset included men with determined prostate biopsy outcomes and for whom at least 6 of 7 features were available. The dataset was divided randomly into a training set (60%) and a test set (40%), with n1/n2 cross-validation used to evaluate model accuracy, and was modeled with linear and quadratic discriminant function analysis and a neural computational system. After a model with acceptable goodness of fit was achieved, reverse regression analysis using Wilks's generalized likelihood ratio test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of each input variable. RESULTS: The receiving operating characteristic (ROC) area for the neural computational system in the test set was 0.825, whereas total PSA and complexed PSA alone had ROC areas of 0.678 and 0.697, respectively. The ROC area of logistic regression in the test set was 0.510, linear discriminant function analysis was 0.674, and quadratic discriminant function analysis was 0.011. All were significantly less than the ROC area of the neural computational model (all Ps < 0.002). Reverse regression based on Wilks's generalized likelihood ratio test demonstrated each input feature to be highly significant to the model (all Ps << 0.000001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors modeled a combination of well described patient risk factors for prostate carcinoma using a neural computational system with acceptable goodness of fit. They demonstrated that each of the seven variates on which the model was based was critically significant to model performance. The authors presented this model for clinical use and suggested that clinicians use it in deciding to perform prostate biopsy.

Cancer worry is associated with abnormal prostate-specific antigen levels in men participating in a community screening program.

An accumulating body of research suggests that psychological factors can affect physiological parameters. We assessed the association between the perceived risk of prostate cancer, prostate cancer-specific worry, and cancer-related symptoms and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or the findings from digital rectal examination (DRE) in a large sample of men undergoing a free prostate cancer screening. Participants (n = 1635) completed a background questionnaire and a questionnaire that assessed their prostate cancer history, screening behavior, perceived risk of prostate cancer, and prostate cancer worry. PSA levels were then determined, and a DRE was conducted. A PSA level of >or=4.0 ng/ml was considered abnormal. The sample size for the multivariate analyses was reduced because of missing data on certain items. Participants who had an abnormal PSA level reported a significantly higher perceived cancer risk (P = 0.02), cancer worry (P = 0.004), and a greater percentage indicated the reason for the current screening was cancer-related symptoms (P = 0.014) than did participants who had normal PSA levels. Multivariate logistic regression analyses controlling for age, past screening behavior, past screening results, and reason for current screening revealed that perceived cancer risk [P = 0.01; odds ratio (OR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-2.1], cancer worry (P = 0.001; OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.7-6.5), and cancer-related symptoms (P = 0.05; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.3) remained significantly associated with an abnormal PSA level. When perceived cancer risk, cancer worry, and cancer-related symptoms were entered in the same multivariate analysis, only cancer worry remained in the model. The present findings suggest that prostate cancer-specific worry was associated significantly with an abnormal PSA level.