Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective randomized comparison.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures (T4-L5) were randomized and not blinded to kyphoplasty (n = 69) or vertebroplasty (n = 70). The postoperative pain score (VAS) at 12 months was the primary end point. The radiographic results were evaluated in relation to the resolution of the fracture and the possible onset of further osteoporotic fractures during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of one hundred and thirty-nine patients were eligible for randomization (n = 70 for PVP group and n = 69 for BKP), and twenty-six patients (twenty in the BKP group and six in the PVP group) were excluded. The mean average age of patients was 73 years, and 82% of the patients were females. VAS pain score was significantly reduced after surgery in both groups, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative VAS score. There was a significant reduction in kyphotic wedge angle and improvement of the sagittal index in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was a significant higher risk incidence of adjacent level fractures in the vertebroplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of clinical outcomes, there were no differences between the two groups. Both showed a significant clinical improvement, vertebral body height restoration and reduction in the kyphotic angle. There was a significant higher risk of adjacent level fractures in the vertebroplasty group.

Iliac crest bone graft: a 23-years hystory of infection at donor site in vertebral arthrodesis and a review of current bone substitutes.

OBJECTIVE: This is an exemplary case report underlining a relevant morbidity which could be associated to the use of autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for spine fusion. CASE REPORT: Starting from 1990, a 25-years-old woman underwent two subsequent surgical treatments for non-Hodgkin lymphoma vertebral localizations. In the second surgery, arthrodesis was obtained with autograft through right posterior iliac crest osteotomy. During the chemotherapy treatment following the surgery, the patient suffered from infection at posterior iliac crest scar, the site of previous graft, caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. She was subjected to surgical debridement and specific antibiotic treatment with local healing and phlogosis index reduction. Chemotherapy protocol was concluded and the patient healed with definitive lymphoma remission. After 22 years the patient had a relapse of donor site infection, requiring a new antibiotic therapy and a new surgical debridement. RESULTS: The relapsed infection at donor site lasted for a long period, more than one year, despite of specific care. It finally healed after another accurate surgical debridement and postoperative antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This case report underlines the possible consequences on the patient's quality of life of a long-term disease affecting the iliac crest bone graft donor site. Literature concerning alternatives to autograft for spine fusion is also reviewed.

Spina bifida occulta in high grade spondylolisthesis.

A 14-year-old boy presented with symptomatic high-grade dysplastic type spondylolisthesis, with a presence of spina bifida occulta, not diagnosed by plain radiographs, but confirmed on preoperative CT and MR. Circumferential fusion with partial reduction of L5/S1 was performed. Awareness of the coexistence of spondylolisthesis and spina bifida by an accurate preoperative planning is paramount to avoid iatrogenic damage to neural elements during surgery.

Surgical treatment of thoraco-lumbar fractures in sickle cell disease: a case report.

Sickle cell disease (or drepanocytosis) is a hemoglobinopathy characterized by an increase in viscosity and adhesivity of the typically sickle-shaped erythrocytes. The pathological osteo-articular involvement in the course of drepanocytosis is secondary to the avascular necrosis of the bone marrow, caused by vaso-occlusive episodes in the microcirculation during acute painful crises. Osteoporosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis are also consequences of the disease. The involvement of the spine is common, with clinical features ranging from simple changes in spinal morphology ("fish-mouth" appearance) up to vertebral bodies fractures with kyphotic deformity. In the presence of vertebral fracture, treatment options listed in the literature are conservative (rest, symptomatic therapy, orthosis), because of the high incidence of intra- and perioperative complications (acute respiratory syndrome, vaso-occlusive crisis…), in addition to the increased rate of implant failure. We report here a case of a young man affected by multiple pathological symptomatic vertebral fractures at the thoraco-lumbar junction, secondary to a well controlled but severe form of sickle cell disease. We decided to treat the patient surgically because of a worsening and potentially invalidating kyphosis deformity. We describe the surgical procedure and the management of a later complication consisting in the collapse of the osteoporotic vertebra below the instrumentation that required a surgical revision. Although a conservative approach is most frequently indicated, we believe that the surgical option should be considered when a clinical worsening occurs in a young patient with otherwise well-controlled disease.

Is lumbar drainage of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula after spine surgery effective?

AIM: This study is a retrospective consecutive case series analysis of 198 patients who underwent spine surgery between 2009 and 2010. The aim of this paper was to assess the efficacy and safeness of bed rest and lumbar drainage in treating postoperative CSF fistula. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula is a well-known complication in spine surgery which lead to a significant change in length of hospitalization and possible postoperative complications. Management of CSF leaks has changed little over the past 20 years with no golden standard advocated from literature. METHODS: Postoperative CSF fistulas were described in 16 of 198 patients (8%) who underwent spine surgery between 2009 and 2010. The choice of the therapeutic strategy was based on the clinical condition of the patients, taking into account the possibility to maintain the prone position continuously and the risk of morbidity due to prolonged bed rest. Six patients were treated conservatively (position prone for three weeks), ten patients were treated by positioning an external CSF lumbar drainage for ten days. The mean follow-up period was ten months. RESULTS: All patients healed their wound properly and no adverse events were recorded. Patients treated conservatively were cured in a mean period of 30 days, while patients treated with CSF drainage were cured in a mean period of 10 days. CONCLUSION: Lumbar drainage seems to be effective and safe both in preventing CSF fistula in cases of large dural tears and debilitated/irradiated patients and in treating CSF leaks.

Spinal infection multidisciplinary management project (SIMP): from diagnosis to treatment guideline.

Spine infections require a multidisciplinary approach to be treated and solved. A guide line to drive physicians in the deep complexity of such a disease is extremely helpful. SIMP suggests a flow-chart built up on clear concepts such as right and well managed antibiotic therapy, sound stability of the spine, correct and smart use of the standard and functional imaging techniques, such as f18 FDG PET/CT. In 16 months a total of 41 patients have been treated for spondylodiscitis, discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis by our team of physicians and 25 patients have been enrolled in a prospective study whose target is the assessment of the SIMP flow-chart and of every single aspect that characterize it.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a disabling and expensive disease of our century. A minimally invasive surgical technique to reduce the pain, the hospitalization, and restore the function.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive spine surgery has gained a great consent in the treatment of vertebral osteoporotic fractures. We perform a retrospective clinical and radiographic review on 32 consecutive patients (22 female and 10 male) surgically treated for a thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture (type A) by a minimally invasive system. By this study, we propose to determine the safety and efficacy of an expandable, percutaneous, minimally invasive technique to reduce the disability caused by vertebral osteoporotic fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients who were operated on between 2003 and 2004 by means of an innovative technique which employs an expandable system inserted by a minimally invasive approach into the vertebral body. Average age at surgery was 64.8 years (range, 27-82). All patients were mobilized in first post-operative day with no external immobilization and discharged from the Hospital in the second post-operative day. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This innovative technique which employs an expandable system inserted by a minimally-invasive approach into the vertebral body permits to obtain a double mechanical support for the vertebral plate, to partially reduce the fracture, to mobilize the patient immediately, reducing disability and costs related to the vertebral osteoporotic fractures.

Management of bone metastases.

Bone metastases are only apparently similar lesions, considering the large varieties of istotypes and the spread of the primary tumour. Although these metastases develop early and are not terminal events, they have to be considered as severe complications. When possible, surgical treatment can improve the history of the patient in terms of life expectancy and quality of life. The approach to these lesions should be multidisciplinary in collaboration with oncologists and radiotherapists. In fact the average of survival of these patients has increased in recent years. The evolution of anesthesiological techniques permits surgical treatments that once were considered prohibitive. The application of new adjuvant therapies increases the effectiveness for surgical treatment. Controversy exists over the most appropriate treatment for patients with bone metastatic disease. The purpose was to determine the best sequential process to arrive at the most appropriate treatment considering the individual general conditions and the parameters of the metastases. As the number of treatment options for metastatic bone disease has grown, it has become clear that effective implementation of these treatments can only be achieved by a multidisciplinary approach.