Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) versus Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS): Presentation and outcome in the nationwide NETSARC+ series of 330 patients over 13 years.

Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) and Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS) are ultrarare sarcomas sharing common translocations whose natural history are not well known. We report on the nationwide exhaustive series of 330 patients with SEF or LGFMS in NETSARC+ since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Since 2010, (i) pathological review has been mandatory for sarcoma,and (ii) tumour/patients' characteristics have been collected in the NETSARC+ nationwide database. The characteristics of patients with SEF and LGFMS and their outcome are compared. RESULTS: 35/73 (48%) and 125/257(49%) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were female. More visceral, bone and trunk primary sites were observed in SEF (p < 0.001). 30% of SEF vs 4% of LGFMS patients had metastasis at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). Median size of the primary tumor was 51 mm (range 10-90) for LGFMS vs 80 (20-320) for SEF (p < 0.001). Median age for LGFMS patients was 12 years younger than that of SEF patients (43 [range 4-98] vs 55 [range 10-91], p < 0.001). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often given to SEF (16% vs 9%, p = 0.05). More patients with LGFMS were operated first in reference centers (51% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The R0 rate on the operative specimen was 41% in LGFMS vs 16% in SEF (p < 0.001). Median event-free survival (EFS) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were 32 vs 136 months (p < 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Fifty-months OS was 93% vs 81% for LGFMS vs SEF (p = 0.05). Median OS was 77 months after first relapse, similar for SEF and LGFMS. In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, metastasis at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for OS in LGFMS. CONCLUSIONS: Although sharing close molecular alterations, SEF and LGFMS have a different natural history, clinical presentation and outcome, with a higher risk of metastatic relapse in SEF. Survival after relapse is longer than with other sarcomas, and similar for SEF and LGFMS.

The indications and donor-site morbidity of tibial cortical strut autografts in the management of defects in long bones.

Aims: The primary aim of this study was to determine the morbidity of a tibial strut autograft and characterize the rate of bony union following its use. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively assessed a series of 104 patients from a single centre who were treated with a tibial strut autograft of > 5 cm in length. A total of 30 had a segmental reconstruction with continuity of bone, 27 had a segmental reconstruction without continuity of bone, 29 had an arthrodesis and 18 had a nonunion. Donor-site morbidity was defined as any event that required a modification of the postoperative management. Union was assessed clinically and radiologically at a median of 36 months (IQR, 14 to 74). Results: Donor-site morbidity occurred in four patients (4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1 to 10). One patient had a stress fracture of the tibia, which healed with a varus deformity, requiring an osteotomy. Two patients required evacuation of a haematoma and one developed anterior compartment syndrome which required fasciotomies. The cumulative probability of union was 90% (95% CI 80 to 96) at five years. The type of reconstruction (p = 0.018), continuity of bone (p = 0.006) and length of tibial graft (p = 0.037) were associated with the time to union. Conclusion: The tibial strut autograft has a low risk of morbidity and provides adequate bone stock for treating various defects of long bones. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:667-74.

Is it safe to preserve the deltoid when resecting the proximal humerus for a primary malignant bone tumour? A comparative study.

AIMS: Resection of the proximal humerus for the primary malignant bone tumour sometimes requires en bloc resection of the deltoid. However, there is no information in the literature which helps a surgeon decide whether to preserve the deltoid or not. The aim of this study was to determine whether retaining the deltoid at the time of resection would increase the rate of local recurrence. We also sought to identify the variables that persuade expert surgeons to choose a deltoid sparing rather than deltoid resecting procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 45 patients who had undergone resection of a primary malignant tumour of the proximal humerus. There were 29 in the deltoid sparing group and 16 in the deltoid resecting group. Imaging studies were reviewed to assess tumour extension and soft-tissue involvement. The presence of a fat rim separating the tumour from the deltoid on MRI was particularly noted. The cumulative probability of local recurrence was calculated in a competing risk scenario. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (adjusted p = 0.89) in the cumulative probability of local recurrence between the deltoid sparing (7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1 to 20) and the deltoid resecting group (26%, 95% CI 8 to 50). Patients were more likely to be selected for a deltoid sparing procedure if they presented with a small tumour (p = 0.0064) with less bone involvement (p = 0.032) and a continuous fat rim on MRI (p = 0.002) and if the axillary nerve could be identified (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: A deltoid sparing procedure can provide good local control after resection of the proximal humerus for a primary malignant bone tumour. A smaller tumour, the presence of a continuous fat rim and the identification of the axillary nerve on pre-operative MRI will persuade surgeons to opt for a deltoid resecting procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1244-9.

Proximal femoral osteosarcoma: Diagnostic challenges translate into delayed and inappropriate management.

BACKGROUND: The proximal femuris is an uncommon site of osteosarcoma. The unusual manifestations at this site may lead to diagnostic and therapeutic mistakes. We therefore performed a retrospective study to estimate the proportions of patients with imaging study findings and/or clinical manifestations typical for osteosarcoma and/or inappropriate treatment decisions. HYPOTHESIS: Proximal femoral osteosarcoma often produces atypical clinical and radiological presentations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent surgery at our center to treat proximal femoral osteosarcoma were included. For each patient, we collected the epidemiological characteristics, clinical symptoms, imaging study findings, treatment, and tumor outcome. Proportions were computed with their confidence intervals. RESULTS: Twelve patients had surgery for proximal femoral osteosarcoma between 1986 and 2015. Imaging findings were typical in 1 (8%) patient; they consisted of ill-defined osteolysis in 11/12 (92%) patients, a periosteal reaction in 1/12 (8%) patient, soft tissue involvement in 7/12 (58%) patients, and immature osteoid matrix in 11/12 (92%) patients. No patient had the typical combination of pain with a soft tissue swelling. Management was inappropriate in 2/12 (17%) patients, who did not undergo all the recommended imaging studies before surgery and were treated in another center before the correct diagnosis was established. At last follow-up, 4 patients had died (after a mean of 7 years) and 8 were alive (after a mean of 4 years). CONCLUSION: Proximal femoral osteosarcoma is uncommon and rarely produces the typical clinical and imaging study findings. The atypical presentation often results in diagnostic errors and inappropriate treatments. Ill-defined osteolysis on standard radiographs should prompt computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal femur. Treatment in a specialized center is imperative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Therapeutic outcome of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in patients with osteoid osteoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term outcome of computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-guided RFA) in patients with suspected osteoid osteoma (OO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective study. Patients with clinical suspicion and imaging diagnosis of osteoid osteoma were treated by CT-guided RFA using the same device with either a 7- or 10-mm active tip electrode. Specific precautions were applied in case of articular or spinal OO. Patients were contacted by phone to evaluate the long-term outcome in terms of pain, ability to perform daily activities (including sports), and long-term complications. Success was defined as the absence of residual pain and ability to perform daily activities normally. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2015, 126 patients were treated by CT-guided RFA for OO in our institution. Mean patient age was 26.1 years (SD = 11, range 1-53); mean delay to diagnosis was 16.9 months (SD = 15.2, range 1-120). Among patients who answered the follow-up call (n = 88), the overall success rate was 94.3%: 79/88 (89.8%) had primary success of the procedure, and 4/88 (4.5%) had a secondary success (repeat-RFA after pain recurrence). Mean follow-up time was 34.6 months (SD = 24.7, range 3-90). Few complications occurred: two mild reversible peripheral nerve injuries, one brachial plexus neuropathy, one broken electrode tip fragment, and one muscular hematoma. CONCLUSION: Osteoid osteoma can be effectively and safely treated by CT-guided RFA using the presented ablation protocol. Beneficial effects of the treatment persist at long-term follow-up.

Monitoring the quality of total hip replacement in a tertiary care department using a cumulative summation statistical method (CUSUM).

The purpose of this study was to define immediate post-operative 'quality' in total hip replacements and to study prospectively the occurrence of failure based on these definitions of quality. The evaluation and assessment of failure were based on ten radiological and clinical criteria. The cumulative summation (CUSUM) test was used to study 200 procedures over a one-year period. Technical criteria defined failure in 17 cases (8.5%), those related to the femoral component in nine (4.5%), the acetabular component in 32 (16%) and those relating to discharge from hospital in five (2.5%). Overall, the procedure was considered to have failed in 57 of the 200 total hip replacements (28.5%). The use of a new design of acetabular component was associated with more failures. For the CUSUM test, the level of adequate performance was set at a rate of failure of 20% and the level of inadequate performance set at a failure rate of 40%; no alarm was raised by the test, indicating that there was no evidence of inadequate performance. The use of a continuous monitoring statistical method is useful to ensure that the quality of total hip replacement is maintained, especially as newer implants are introduced.

Intercalary defects reconstruction of the femur and tibia after primary malignant bone tumour resection. A series of 13 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Performing intercalary segment reconstruction after malignant bone tumour resection results in both mechanical and biological challenges. Fixation must be solid enough to avoid short-term or mid-term mechanical failure. The use of an allograft or autograft must ensure long-term survival of the reconstruction. The goal of this study was to analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of these reconstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were operated on eight femurs and five tibias. The median age was 20 years old (range 14-50). The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma. The median resection length was 15cm (Q1-Q3: 6-26). A plate was used for fixation in nine cases and an intramedullary locked nail in four cases. An isolated bone autograft was used in two cases, an isolated bone allograft in one case, a dual autograft-allograft composite in six cases, and vascularised fibula and allograft combination in four cases. RESULTS: The cumulative probability of union was 46% (95% CI: 0-99%) at 1 year; at the final follow-up, union was achieved in 12 patients (92%). Because of non-unions, 13 iterative procedures were needed to obtain these results. A non-displaced fracture of a cuboid-shaped tibial graft occurred in one patient, which was treated conservatively. Three infections occurred. DISCUSSION: The results of intercalary segmental defects reconstruction after bone tumour resection were good, both from an oncologic and radiological point-of-view. One or more iterative procedures are sometimes needed to finally obtain bone union. We prefer to use a free rectangular cuboidal tibial graft since reconstruction with a vascularised autograft is technically more difficult. The choice of fixation methods is still controversial and no approach was found to be superior. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.

Primary or recurring extra-abdominal desmoid fibromatosis: assessment of treatment by observation only.

INTRODUCTION: Extra-abdominal desmoid fibromatosis (EADF) is a benign tumoral condition, classically managed by more or less radical and sometimes mutilating excision. This treatment strategy is associated with a recurrence rate of nearly 50% according to various reports. HYPOTHESIS: EADF may show spontaneous stabilization over time. METHODS: A retrospective series of 26 cases of EADF managed by simple observation was studied to assess spontaneous favorable evolution and identify possible factors impacting evolution. Eleven cases were of primary EADF with no treatment or surgery, and 15 of recurrence after surgery with no adjuvant treatment. MRI was the reference examination during follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases showed stabilization at a median 14 months; there were no cases of renewed evolution after stabilization. One primary tumor showed spontaneous regression, and one recurrence still showed evolution at end of follow-up (23 months). The sole factor impacting potential for evolution was prior surgery. No radiologic or pathologic criteria of evolution emerged from analysis. DISCUSSION: The present series, one of the largest dedicated to EADF managed by observation, confirmed recent literature findings: a conservative "wait-and-see" attitude is reasonable and should be considered when large-scale resection would entail significant functional or esthetic impairment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.

[Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation]. / Chondrosarcomes dédifférenciés: revue iconographique radio-pathologique.

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas are highly malignant tumors characterized by conventional low-grade chondrosarcoma with abrupt transition to foci that have dedifferentiated into a higher-grade noncartilaginous more aggressive sarcoma. The dedifferentiated component, an osteosarcoma or fibrosarcoma, determines the prognosis. Its identification is key for management. A diagnosis of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma should be suggested by the presence of "tumoral dimorphism" with cartilaginous component and aggressive lytic component invading adjacent soft tissues.

Pelvic chondrosarcomas: surgical treatment options.

INTRODUCTION: Chondrosarcoma (CS) is a primary malignant bone tumor with cartilaginous differentiation. The only available treatment is carcinological surgical resection since the usual adjuvant treatments are ineffective. The pelvic location creates specific technical difficulties both for exeresis and reconstruction. Our objective was to evaluate the carcinological and functional outcomes of inter-ilioabdominal amputation and conservative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 59 cases of pelvis chondrosarcoma managed in our department between 1968 and 2003. Demographic, anatomopathological, surgical and survival data were analyzed. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curves and the cumulative incidence method. Multivariate analysis was used to identify all possible independent prognostic variables. RESULTS: There were 33 men and 26 women, with an average age of 48 years. The average follow-up duration was 94 months. Eleven patients had a grade 1 chondrosarcoma, 36 a grade 2 chondrosarcoma, five were grade 3, and seven were dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Eleven patients underwent an inter-ilioabdominal disarticulation, and 48 had a more conservative surgery. Resection margins proved healthy in 46 patients (78%). Eighteen patients (31%) had a local recurrence, and 12 (20%) had metastases. At last follow-up, 30 patients (51%) were still alive without any sign of recurrence. Twenty-three patients (39%) died from the disease. Multivariate analysis showed that margin invasion was associated with a definitely increased local recurrence rate. A high tumoral grade was correlated with a greater risk of metastases occurrence. These two last factors (margin status and tumor grade) as well as acetabulum involvement were correlated with a reduced survival rate. Function was better among patients treated by conservative surgery, and among them, even better when the peri-acetabular area remained intact. Our study confirmed that resection margins quality is a major prognostic factor both for local control and for survival. On the other hand, local recurrence is an adverse survival prognosis factor and is itself correlated with resection margins quality. Peri-acetabular chondrosarcoma location (in zone 2) appears to be a poor oncological prognosis factor since, in this location, obtaining healthy margins appears particularly difficult. Compared to resection, inter-ilioabdominal amputation did not prove its superiority concerning resection margins quality or survival. However, resection guaranteed a better functional outcome. CONCLUSION: Chondrosarcoma of the pelvic girdle remains of worse prognosis than peripheral bones chondrosarcoma since the critical prognosis factor is the resection margins quality. This location, and especially the peri-acetabular zone, poses difficult specific technical problems when conservative surgery is selected. Various imaging techniques should help better envision tumor resection extent. Inter-ilioabdominal amputation should only be resorted to in non-metastatic patients, when the tumor does not seem to be removable with sufficient healthy margins guarantee, or when local conditions make it impossible to hope for a good quality reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; therapeutic retrospective study.

Surgical management of pelvic primary bone tumors involving the sacroiliac joint.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic primary malignant bone tumours, especially when involving the sacroiliac joint are difficult to treat. Abdominoperineal amputations are today used, only in life-threatening situations. HYPOTHESIS: A precisely planed surgical technique can save the affected extremity without compromising the resection quality and subsequent patient survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess the procedures used for resection and reconstruction of bone tumours invading the sacroiliac joint as well as their effects on cancer outcome and functional results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a continuous and retrospective analysis of 24 patients treated between 1986 and 2003. Six tumours affected the sacral body and 18 tumours involved the wing of the ilium. The joint articular surface was invaded in only six cases. Seventeen patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The procedure was performed through an enlarged iliac crest incision, giving access to two sections of the pelvic ring. Six cases required neurological sacrifice. Initial tumour grading was based on the Enneking classification, and the functional results, on the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system. RESULTS: The average operation lasted 5.27 hours. Reconstruction was performed with bone autograft and instrumentation. Resection was large with adequate margins 11 times, marginal 12 times, and contaminated once. Average follow-up was 4.77 years. The 5-year survival rate was 50%. Twelve patients either died from their disease or were in the metastatic stage at final follow-up. Survival was linked to the quality of resection and initial tumour staging. Hemisacrectomy did not affect patient survival. Local recurrences had a poor prognosis with eight cases of secondary metastases out of 11. Bone healing occurred in 13 patients, 10 of whom survived. Of the 12 patients who survived and were in complete remission at final follow-up, the average MSTS score was 61%. The score was at 38.6% in cases involving neurological sacrifice, and at 77.1% for the rest of the group. It was at 64% in healed cases and 13% in nonunion cases. DISCUSSION: The survival of patients presenting with a sacroiliac joint tumour is substantially related to both tumour histology and resection quality. Local recurrences carry a poor prognosis with a high rate of secondary metastatic dissemination. In situations where disease control can be achieved, the proposed method of reconstruction allows, satisfactory bone healing and fair functional recovery, provided no major neurological sacrifice has taken place. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV: Retrospective Therapeutic Study.

Immediate mobilization compared with conventional immobilization for the impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fracture. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There have been few randomized controlled trials evaluating nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. To investigate shortening the period of dependence, we assessed the feasibility and efficacy of early mobilization of the shoulder (within three days after the fracture) in comparison with those of conventional three-week immobilization followed by physiotherapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned seventy-four patients with an impacted proximal humeral fracture to receive early passive mobilization or conventional treatment. The primary outcome was the overall shoulder functional status (as measured with the Constant score) at three months. The secondary outcomes were the Constant score at six weeks and at six months, the change in pain (on a visual analog scale), and the active and passive range of motion. RESULTS: At three months and at six weeks, the early mobilization group had a significantly better Constant score than did the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 9.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 17.8] [p = 0.02] and 10.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 18.1] [p = 0.02], respectively) and better active mobility in forward elevation (between-group difference, 12.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 22.4] [p = 0.02] and 28.1 [95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 49.1] [p = 0.01], respectively). At three months, the early mobilization group had significantly reduced pain compared with the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 15.7 [95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 30.8] [p = 0.04]). No complications in displacement or nonhealing were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Early mobilization for impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fractures is safe and is more effective for quickly restoring the physical capability and performance of the injured arm than is conventional immobilization followed by physiotherapy.

[Multicentric giant-cell tumor]. / Tumeur à cellules géantes multifocale.

Nearly all (99) giant-cell tumors are solitary. The multicentric presentation is exceptional and not well elucidated. We report the case of a patient presenting five foci identified over an eleven-year period (right tibia, left 4th metacarpal, sacrum, right femur, left femur). The proliferation index was identified for each focus. A review of the literature shows that the development of a new center after treatment for giant-cell tumor is a well-known event, with a wide variability in localizations, number and time to development. The most recent data suggest that each center would be independent progressing according to an individual course. Since histological transformation is not observed and multicenter forms are very exceptional, we suggest that it would not be necessary to propose specific screening for patients with a giant-cell tumor but that it would be good to inform the patient of the possibility of multicentric presentations.

[Twenty nine shoulder reconstructions after resection of the proximal humerus for neoplasm with mean 7-year follow-up]. / Les reconstructions après résection tumorale de l'extrémité supérieure de l'humérus.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Techniques available for shoulder reconstruction after resection of a tumor of the proximal humerus include scapulohumeral arthrodesis, humerus prosthesis with or without an allograft, inverted prostheses, and massive allografts. The purpose of this study was to review clinical and radiological outcomes in a series of 29 patients (20 men and 9 women) who underwent resection-reconstruction of the proximal humerus and to establish from these cases a decision making algorithm for therapeutic indications as a function of tumor invasion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The tumors were 20 chondrosarcomas, five osteosarcomas, two Ewing sarcomas and one malignant hemangiopericytoma. In 17 patients epiphyso-metaphyseal or epiphyso-metaphyso-diaphyseal resection was performed with preservation of the abductor muscles (type S34A or S345A according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification). For 12 patients epiphyso-metaphyseal or epiphyso-metaphyso-diaphyseal resection was performed without preservation of the abductor muscles (type S34B or S345B). Reconstruction was achieved using a centromedullary cemented nail in one patient, scapulohumeral arthrodesis in three, a massive humerus prosthesis in 15, and composite humerus prosthesis in three and an inverted prosthesis in seven. The functional score of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and standard x-rays were used to assess outcome. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 85 months (range 16-300). The mean MSTS score was 88% for inverted prostheses, 76% for composite prostheses, 72.6% for massive prostheses, 75% for scapulohumeral arthrodeses, 67% for massive prostheses, and 80% for cemented centromendullary nail. Five patients died from their malignant disease and one from another cause. Four patients are alive but with active disease after a mean follow-up of 108 months and 19 patients (65.5%) are alive and free of locoregional recurrence or metastasis after a mean 83.5 months. We had 28 complications. Glenohumeral instability was the most frequent (11 cases). DISCUSSION: Resection of the upper portion of the humerus should be performed to achieve cancerologically satisfactory tumor resection and enable shoulder resection, if possible, with preservation of a viable and functional abductor system. The functional outcome after such reconstruction depends on the type of bony resection, but also on the sacrifice of the rotator cuff and the deltoid muscle. In light of our experience and results in the literature, we advocate, despite the small number of cases for the different reconstructions, the following decision-making algorithm after resection of the proximal humerus without joint invasion: when the resection removes the rotator cuff and the deltoid (or the axillary nerve), there are two options: scapulohumeral arthrodesis or massive humerus prosthesis for patients who do not desire a complex therapy with a long postoperative period; when the resection preserves the rotator cuff and/or the deltoid muscle, reconstruction can be achieved with a composite (inverted or not) prosthesis with suture of the cuff tendons. We prefer the inverted composite prosthesis; if the deltoid muscle can be preserved but not the rotator cuff, the composite inverted prosthesis appears to be the most logical solution, but scapulohumeral arthrodesis can be proposed in selected cases.

[Primary bone lymphoma. Retrospective immunohistochemical study of 22 cases]. / Les lymphomes osseux primitifs. Etude rétrospective sur 22 cas avec étude immuno-histochimique récente et homogène.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The clinical, biological, radiological, MRI, and histological features of 22 primary bone lymphomas were reviewed retrospectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The standard pathology slides were reexamined with an immunohistochemistry study. Results of two treatments, chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy then radiotherapy, were compared in terms of local control and patient survival. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 53 years; male gender predominated (M/F=2/1). The most frequent clinical sign was pain and 32% of the patients had a pathological fracture. The long bones were generally involved. The typical radiographic image was a permeable bone defect. MRI demonstrated heterogeneous signals on the T2 images. Technetium scintigraphy (performed in all patients) was very sensitive. Histology generally described diffuse large centroblastic lymphoid cells, all with B phenotype. Twelve patients were treated with chemotherapy alone and eight with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. One patient was only given palliative treatment with corticosteroids due to major immunodepression. The last patient, a 79-year-old woman, developed a tumor of the femoral neck; at surgery section of the neck removed the entire tumor, but radiotherapy (30 Gy) centered on the femur was nevertheless performed. Only patients with fractures were operated. Mean follow-up in this series was 48 months (range 4-120). Mean 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 74.41% for the overall series, 83.33% for the chemotherapy group and 82.50% for the chemotherapy-radiotherapy group. DISCUSSION: We were unable to demonstrate any significant difference in survival between the two types of treatment. None of the patients experience local relapse. Our observations suggest that technetium scintigraphy is more sensitive than MRI and more specific for diagnosis. Radiography, together with clinical examination and is indicated to monitor these patients during and after treatment. Based on this series, patients with primary bone lymphoma should be given chemotherapy, either alone or combined with radiotherapy, rather than radiotherapy alone. Surgery is not indicated except to obtain a biopsy and to treat mechanical complications.

[A new cause of postoperative confusion syndrome: nefopam]. / Une nouvelle cause de syndrome confusionnel postopératoire: la prise de néfopam.

We report a case of nefopam intoxication in a severely malnourished postoperative intensive care patient with profound hypoprotidemia. Nefopam induced agitation and confusion associated with anticholinergic symptoms such as tremor, hypertonia, mydriasis, and tachycardia. All these symptoms disappeared after withdrawal of the drug. Nefopam should be considered as a possible cause of confusion in postoperative patients.