Cefepime neurotoxicity: thresholds and risk factors. A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Toxic serum cefepime trough concentrations are not well defined in the current literature. We aimed to define a more precise plasma trough concentration threshold for this antibiotic's neurological toxicity and to identify individuals at risk for developing neurotoxic side effects. METHODS: Retrospective study including all individuals who underwent cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) between 2013 and 2017. Individuals with cefepime concentrations other than trough were excluded. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence of neurotoxicity and its relationship with cefepime plasma trough concentrations. Secondary outcomes were the relationship of renal function, cefepime daily dose, age, and cerebral and general co-morbidities with the occurrence of neurotoxicity. We also compared the mortality rate during hospitalization in individuals with and without neurotoxicity, and the possible impact of neuroprotective co-medications on outcomes. RESULTS: Cefepime concentrations were determined in 584 individuals. Among 319 individuals with available trough concentrations included, the overall incidence of neurotoxicity was 23.2% (74 of 319 individuals). Higher cefepime plasma trough concentrations were significantly associated with risk of neurotoxicity (no neurotoxicity 6.3 mg/L (interquartile range (IQR) 4.1-8.6) versus with neurotoxicity 21.6 mg/L (IQR 17.0-28.6), p <0.001). Individuals with presumed cefepime neurotoxicity had a significantly lower renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate 82.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 45.0-105.0) versus 35.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 23.3-53.3], p <0.001), and significantly higher in-hospital mortality (19 (7.8%) versus 26 (35.1%) individuals, p <0.001). No neurotoxic side effects were seen below a trough concentration of 7.7 mg/L. Levels ≥38.1 mg/L always led to neurological side effects. CONCLUSION: In individuals with risk factors for cefepime neurotoxicity, such as renal insufficiency, TDM should be systematically performed, aiming at trough concentrations <7.5 mg/L.

Performances of two different panfungal PCRs to detect mould DNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue: what are the limiting factors?

BACKGROUND: Detection of fungal DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is challenging due to degradation of DNA and presence of PCR inhibitors in these samples. We analyzed FFPE samples of 26 patients by panfungal PCR and compared the results to the composite diagnosis according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. Additionally we analyzed the quality of human and fungal DNA and their level of age-dependent degradation, as well as the existence of PCR inhibition in these tissue samples. METHODS: We evaluated two 45-cycle panfungal PCR tests that target the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) as well as the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS1-2) region. The PCRs were applied to 27 FFPE specimens from 26 patients with proven invasive fungal disease (IFD), and one patient with culture and histologically negative but PCR-positive fungal infection collected at our institution from 2003 to 2010. Quality of DNA in FFPE tissue samples was evaluated using fragments of the beta-globin gene for multiplex PCR, inhibition of PCR amplification was evaluated by spiking of C. krusei DNA to each PCR premix. RESULTS: In 27 FFPE samples the ITS2 PCR targeting the shorter fragment showed a higher detection rate with a sensitivity of 53.8% compared to the ITS1-2 fragment (sensitivity 38%). Significant time-dependent degradation of human DNA in FFPE sample extracts was detected based on partial beta-globin gene amplification which was not in correlation to successful panfungal PCR identification of fungal organisms. The analytical sensitivity of both assays compared with culture was 60 CFU/ml of a Candida krusei reference strain. The performance of the two tests in an Aspergillus proficiency panel of an international external quality assessment programme showed considerable sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Panfungal diagnostic PCR assays applied on FFPE specimens provide accurate identification of molds in highly degraded tissue samples and correct identification in samples stored up to 7 years despite sensitivity limitations, mainly caused by partial PCR inhibition and DNA degradation by formalin.