RESUMO
In this communication, we report the discovery of 1S (apremilast), a novel potent and orally active phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor. The optimization of previously reported 3-(1,3-dioxo-1,3-dihydroisoindol-2-yl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)propionic acid PDE4 inhibitors led to this series of sulfone analogues. Evaluation of the structure-activity relationship of substitutions on the phthalimide group led to the discovery of an acetylamino analogue 1S, which is currently in clinical trials.
Assuntos
Descoberta de Drogas , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 4 , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/farmacologia , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Administração Oral , Animais , Humanos , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/química , Ratos , Estereoisomerismo , Relação Estrutura-Atividade , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/química , Talidomida/farmacologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine aqueous humor concentrations of brimonidine given the following ophthalmic formulations in female New Zealand White Rabbits: (1) BAK-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.20% at a pH of 6.4; (2) BAK-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15% at a pH of 6.4, and (3) Purite((R))-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15% at a pH of 7.3. METHODS: Eighteen (18) animals were given a 35-microL drop of formulation into each eye. Aqueous humor samples were collected at 9 time points over 8 hours. Brimonidine concentrations were quantified using LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: The C(max) was achieved between 0.33-0.67 hours postdosing for all 3 formulations. Mean C(max) after Purite-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15% was 88% higher than that after BAK-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15% (p = 0.040), and 44% higher than that after BAK-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.20% (p = 0.0784). AUC(0-3 hr) values were comparable for all 3 formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Purite-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15% produced higher peak concentrations than BAK-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15%. It also had a concentration that was comparable to BAK-preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.20%. The differences in safety may result from the change in preservative.
