ANESTHESIA FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - A CHALLENGE FOR ANAESTHESIOLOGIST.

Mininimally invasive surgery has become one of the most popular ones over the last few decades due to many benefits. The advantages are minimal surgical incision, reduced blood loss, reduced postoperative pain, faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay, lower morbidity and better outcomes compared to open surgery. The most common robotic procedures in urology are radical prostatectomies. In UHC Zagreb, since November 2019 until now, there have been more than 180 robotic assisted radical prostatectomies (RALP) using Senhance robotic system performed. As a procedure with many possible complications, it represents a challenge for anaesthesiologist. Some of the problems the anaesthesiologists have to face are related to limited patient access, possible difficulties connected with positioning, pneumoperitoneum, subcutaneous emphysema, possible airway oedema. Pneumoperitoneum has impact on almost every system: cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal and other. Detailed understanding of physiological changes of RALP, with intraoperative impact on nearly every body system is ultimate. Careful preoperative evaluation and intraoperative conduction minimize the risk of complications, and help patients to reach full recovery in a very short time. Excellent outcomes are the result of individualized approach to the patient and good communication between team members.

SENHANCE ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY.

Since its introduction 20 years ago, robotic radical prostatectomy has become a standard of care in the treatment of localized prostate cancer in many Centers. Until recently, they have all been performed by the only available robotic platform. Senhance is a novel robotic platform that was approved for clinical use. The term Senhance was used to systematically search PubMed and Scopus databases for relevant articles that were afterward filtered for appropriate designs and data reports. There were two reports that met all of the criteria and were included in the review. Both studies were designed as prospective case series with a total of 234 patients where the data including operative data and oncological outcomes were reported. The average operative time ranged between 180 and 195 min, with estimated blood loss between 250 and 300 mL. There was 3 Clavien - Dindo grade III, and 1 Clavien - DIndo grade IV complication reported. One of the studies compared it with laparoscopy, but no significant difference in operative time and blood loss was found. Both studies concluded that the Senhance is a feasible and safe robotic platform for radical prostatectomy.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF HIGH-RISK PROSTATIC CARCINOMA AND OLIGOMETASTATIC DISEASE.

Prostate cancer is responsible for the largest number of cancer-related deaths in male population in many countries of the world. Aggressive forms of the disease are associated with an increased risk of local recurrence and death. Treatment of high-risk local prostate cancer most commonly involves radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without the addition of brachytherapy (BT). The use of surgery for high risk prostatic carcinoma (HRPC) is on the rise, because of its advantages including the possibility of cure with surgery alone without the risk of toxicities from prolonged ADT, accurate staging, and avoiding the influence of PSA originating from benign prostatic hyperplasia on future therapy. Oligometastatic prostate cancer may be considered as the last border of possibly curable disease. Radical prostatectomy in oligometastatic prostate cancer can significantly decrease the risk of local complications but only multimodal approach in selected group of patients may offer opportunities to eradicate tumor or delay its progression. Surgery for oligometastatic disease most commonly targets lymphatic disease with salvage pelvic lymph node dissection, whereas it rarely targets distant metastases. Further prospective, randomized studies are necessary to define the role and value of therapies in oligometastatic prostate cancer.

First documented case of successful kidney transplantation from a donor with acute renal failure treated with dialysis.

There is a widening gap between the needs and possibilities of kidney transplantation. In order to solve the problem of organ shortage, the selection criteria for kidney donors have been less stringent over the last years. Favorable outcome of renal transplantation from deceased donors with acute renal failure requiring dialysis may have an important role in expanding the pool of donors. We present the case of two renal transplantations from a polytraumatized 20-years old donor with acute renal failure requiring dialysis. One recipient established good diuresis from the first post-transplant day and did not require hemodialysis. The second recipient had delayed graft function and was treated with 8 hemodialysis sessions. The patient was discharged with good diuresis and normal serum creatinine. After two years of follow-up, both recipients have normal graft function. According to our experience, kidneys from deceased young donors with acute renal failure requiring dialysis may be transplanted, in order to decrease the number of patients on transplantation waiting lists.

Renal replacement therapy in cardiology wards: changing trends in a transitional country.

The leading causes of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are cardiovascular diseases, regardless of the stage of disease or method of renal replacement therapy. On the other hand, CKD is a major risk factor for cardiovascular complications after acute myocardial infarction, as well as for adverse outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. In the present study we prospectively followed-up nephrological interventions in cardiology wards in order to determine changes in indications, treatment possibilities and outcome of patients. All patients treated at cardiology ward of the Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb and requiring renal replacement therapy from January 2003 to December 2009 were included in the investigation. Cardiology hospital unit (intensive care or regular hospital cardiology ward), age, gender, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, indication for dialysis, primary diagnosis, vascular access, methods of treatment, number of treatments, prescribed and delivered dose of dialysis and outcome were recorded. Patients were followed up until death during hospitalization or discharge from the hospital. From January 2003 to December 2009, 251 patients had been hospitalized at different cardiology wards and required renal replacement therapy. Mean age was 64.95 years (range 22 to 97 years), and there were 27.8% female patients. 52.9% of patients were hospitalized in the coronary intensive care unit. SOFA score had increased during the observed period from average 6.5 in 2003 to 13.45 in 2009. Specific knowledge with close collaboration between nephrologists and cardiologists is needed to achieve optimal outcome in this complex condition.

[Outcome of renal transplantation after tacrolimus switch to cyclosporine]. / Ishod transplantacije bubrega nakon prevodenja s takrolimusa na ciklosporin.

Calcineurin inhibitors play the key role in current immunosuppressive therapy in transplantation medicine. We present our experience with tacrolimus as immunosuppressive therapy and the reasons for replacing tacrolimus with cyclosporine in some patients. We monitored graft function, serum lipid levels, and blood glucose concentration before and after immunosuppressant switch. The most common reason for change of immunosuppressive therapy was insulin dependent hyperglycemia; calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity was the reason for switching immunosuppressive therapy in a small number of patients; and in one patient, the reason for immunosuppressive therapy switching was BK virus infection. Blood glucose normalized soon after the introduction of cyclosporine in the treatment. Monitoring of laboratory tests before and after immunosuppressive therapy switching showed the graft function to have remained unchanged.