Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 80: 379-385, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34780943

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Impella transaortic microaxial left ventricular assist device (MLVAD) bears the risk of severe ipsilateral limb ischemia due to its percutaneous insertion through the common femoral artery (CFA). As long as the MLVAD is required for cardio - circulatory support, treatment options are limited. Therefore, we developed a temporary extracorporeal femoral - femoral crossover bypass to restore and maintain perfusion of the affected leg. METHODS: From October 2018, we treated all patients with severe limb ischemia due to the MLAVD with a femoral - femoral crossover bypass. For comparison, a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing placement of the MLAVD between January 2011 and October 2018 was identified. The primary outcome is the feasibility and safety of our percutaneously established extracorporeal femoral - femoral crossover bypass. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and July 2019, 25 of 245 (10.3%) patients developed a severe ipsilateral limb ischemia following the MLVAD placement. Until October 2018, 20 patients were treated conventionally (C - cohort) and since October 2018, five (consecutive) patients have been treated by an extracorporeal femoral - femoral cross over bypass (BP - Cohort). Following the BP - procedure, an immediate improvement of the perfusion was seen in all patients. Limb salvage was documented in 100% of our patients and 30 - day mortality was 60% in both groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first case series reporting on this novel technique. We demonstrated that the percutaneous creation of an extracorporeal crossover bypass is feasible, safe and effective and should therefore be promoted.


Assuntos
Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Isquemia/terapia , Salvamento de Membro/métodos , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Isquemia/etiologia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(1): 268-275, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348005

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Different graft materials have been proposed for in situ reconstruction in the setting of vascular graft infection (VGI). We analyzed the long-term outcomes after in situ aortoiliac reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone in situ aortoiliac reconstruction with cryopreserved arterial allografts for VGI from 2000 to 2015. The end points were the perioperative and long-term mortality and graft-related complications, including stenosis, occlusion, pseudoaneurysm, and reinfection. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (91% male) with a median age of 67 years (range, 53-83 years) had undergone in situ aortoiliac reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts. The 30-day mortality was 6% (n = 2); both deaths were related to the allograft (one early allograft-enteric fistula and one graft rupture). Another two patients had experienced early (≤30 days) graft-related events (one allograft-enteric fistula and one graft limb occlusion), for an early graft-related complication rate of 12% (n = 4). Of the 31 discharged patients, 13 (42%) had died after a median of 47 months (range, 2-97 months). The median follow-up for the 18 remaining patients was 96 months (range, 10-146 months). The estimated survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 88%, 81%, and 66%, respectively. Nine patients (29%) had experienced at least one of the following graft-related events during follow-up, including graft stenosis requiring intervention in five (16%), graft occlusion in four (13%), pseudoaneurysm in three (10%), and reinfection in two patients (6%). The estimated freedom from any first graft-related event at 1, 3, and 5 years was 78%, 71%, and 62%, respectively. The estimated primary patency and primary assisted patency at 1 and 3 years was 87% and 79%, and 90% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In situ aortoiliac reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts to treat VGI was associated with relevant perioperative graft-related complications. Although the reinfection rate was acceptable, other graft-related complications were frequent in the long term, in particular, graft occlusion and stenosis.


Assuntos
Aorta/cirurgia , Bioprótese , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Criopreservação , Artéria Ilíaca/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Reinfecção , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...