Niemann-Pick disease type A and B are clinically but also enzymatically heterogeneous: pitfall in the laboratory diagnosis of sphingomyelinase deficiency associated with the mutation Q292 K.

This study describes a diagnostic pitfall in the laboratory diagnosis of patients with sphingomyelinase deficiency (SMD; Niemann-Pick disease types A and B; NPA and NPB), in cases where sphingomyelinase activity was not determined with sphingomyelin as the natural enzymic substrate. Four of 24 SMD patients studied had falsely normal or enhanced activity, when a so-called artificial sphingomyelinase substrate, 2-N-(hexadecanoyl)-amino-4-nitrophenyl phosphorylcholine (HNP), was used, whereas SMD was clear with the sphingomyelin substrate. Those four patients had the Q292 K mutation of the acid sphingomyelinase gene (SMPD1) on at least one allele. Three of the four patients (no data available from one) experienced only late-infantile or juvenile, though distinct, neurological involvement, where learning disabilities, hypo- or areflexia or mild ataxia were initial signs. The laboratory pitfall with HNP substrate, which is used in many laboratories, raises the risk that some SMD patients are overlooked, and it prevents the consideration of a late-manifesting neurological course in some patients as well as the planning of enzyme substitution therapy in non-neurological SMD (NPB) patients. Since classical NPB is very rare, it is suggested that SMD patients with late- or mild-manifesting neurological symptoms should better be assigned to additional SMD subgroups than grouped with NPB.

Clinical and economic evaluation of oral ciprofloxacin after an abbreviated course of intravenous antibiotics.

PURPOSE: Oral ciprofloxacin has the requisite pharmacokinetic and antibacterial properties to rival the potency of intravenous antibiotics. This study was designed to determine whether oral ciprofloxacin could abbreviate the course of intravenous antibiotics in the treatment of serious infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hospitalized adult patients were eligible for enrollment if they had a serious infection that was expected to require 8 or more days of intravenous antibiotic treatment. After conventional intravenous antibiotics were administered for 3 days, informed consent was obtained and patients were randomly assigned to either continue parenteral antibiotics (n = 53) or switch to oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg taken twice daily (n = 52). Ninety-nine of the 105 patients were evaluable for the assessment of efficacy. Clinical and bacteriologic efficacy, adverse events, and costs of the two treatments were compared. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were comparable for demographic characteristics, types of infections, bacteria isolated, initial intravenous antibiotic regimens, and duration of antibiotic treatment. The most common infections were of the skin and skin structure; bacteremia and infections of the lower respiratory tract, urinary tract, and bone and joint were also represented. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. The most frequently prescribed intravenous antibiotics before randomization included aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and nafcillin; 52 evaluable patients were treated with combination therapy while 47 received monotherapy. The clinical and bacteriologic outcomes and adverse reaction frequency with oral ciprofloxacin were comparable to those of the continued intravenous antibiotic regimens. Ciprofloxacin was associated with an average cost savings of $293 per patient. CONCLUSION: When used after 3 days of intravenous antibiotics, oral ciprofloxacin was as safe and effective as full courses of intravenous antibiotics and provided substantial cost savings.