Posterior column reconstruction with autologous rib graft after en bloc tumor excision.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive case series. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of using autologous rib graft for fusion across long posterior column defects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Achieving fusion across large posterior column defects after en bloc tumor resection can be difficult. Rib graft can be harvested from the local wound, and its shape and structural properties are well suited for reconstruction of thoracic posterior column deficits. METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, a retrospective review of the charts of 17 consecutive patients undergoing posterior column reconstruction after en bloc tumor resections was carried out. Autologous vascularized and nonvascularized rib grafts were utilized in 8 and 9 cases, respectively; 14 patients with malignant tumors and 3 with benign etiology. After surgery, patients underwent routine clinical and radiographic follow-up, with a computed tomographic scan performed at a minimum of 6 months in all surviving patients. Clinical and radiographic films were analyzed. RESULTS: Computed tomographic scans at a minimum of 6 months demonstrated graft incorporation in all surviving cases. There was no obvious difference at 6-month imaging to differentiate vascularized from nonvascularized grafts. There were no cases of graft dislodgement or fracture. Graft site morbidity was difficult to isolate from the morbidity of these large procedures. No complications related to the graft were identified. CONCLUSION: The use of autologous rib graft with a proximal step-cut and distal saddle-cut supplemented with posterior instrumentation allowed immediate stabilization of the posterior column defect created by the en bloc tumor resection. This technique of fashioning the graft and taking advantage of its natural curved structure for immediate press-fit was associated with graft incorporation in our cases.

Posterior transdiscal three-column shortening in the surgical treatment of vertebral discitis/osteomyelitis with collapse.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive case series. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early surgical results and complications of thoracic transdiscal osteotomies and vertebral shortening for the treatment of thoracic discitis/osteomyelitis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic discitis/osteomyelitis leads to collapse of the disc space and/or vertebral body. We propose a novel technique to achieve the same goals as anterior column reconstruction through an entirely posterior approach. Shortening of the vertebral column provides structural support without the morbidity of an anterior approach. METHODS: Following REB approval, retrospective review of the charts of five patients that underwent posterior only thoracic transdiscal osteotomies and vertebral shortening for discitis/osteomyelitis was carried out. Posterior only surgery was performed in these patients with excision of the affected disc space and corresponding posterior elements. Instrumented fusion was performed across the segment spanning multiple vertebral levels. Clinical outcome, radiographic correction, and perioperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Three patients had bacterial discitis, and 2 had tuberculosis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 61 years (50-76). Mean follow-up was 45 months (25-63). There was no neurologic deterioration; 2 patients with Frankel grade B improved to grade D and E, respectively. Mean kyphosis corrected from 36 degrees (14-90) to 4 degrees (0-8), and the mean construct spanned 9 levels (6-15). No major complications were encountered during surgery. Two patients underwent revision surgeries, 1 patient died of unrelated causes at 6 months. All patients were treated with a full course of postoperative antibiotic treatment. No cases of recurrent infection were recorded. CONCLUSION: Thoracic transdiscal osteotomy with vertebral shortening is a safe and effective option for the treatment of infectious discitis/osteomyelitis with associated kyphosis. With adjuvant antibiotics, it effectively eradicates the infection through a posterior only approach, avoiding the need for anterior procedures and long anterior struts.

A technique of anterior screw removal through a posterior costotransversectomy approach for posterior-based osteotomies.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel technique to remove anterior instrumentation from a posterior approach while performing posterior-based osteotomies for spinal deformities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior-based osteotomies such as pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) and vertebral column resections are performed to restore sagittal alignment. The removal of previously placed anterior implants at the desired osteotomy level can often be challenging. We propose a technique for the removal of anterior instrumentation through a posterior approach to facilitate osteotomy closure and deformity correction, while avoiding the need for an anterior incision. METHODS: A 34-year-old woman presented with a residual deformity after several anterior and posterior procedures. The residual coronal Cobb angle measured 60 degrees between T7 and L2, with a 46 degrees thoracolumbar kyphosis between T10 and L2. The screw head at the desired osteotomy level was in close proximity to the liver after the previous right-sided thoracoabdominal approach. Therefore, the T11 anterior screw was accessed through a posterior costotransversectomy approach and disconnected from the rod proximally and distally with a high-speed side-cutting burr. A portion of the right lateral vertebral body of T11 was removed to expose the neck of the screw, which was separated from the shaft with the same burr. A PSO was performed at T11 and the remaining screw shank was removed with the posterior-based osteotomy. RESULTS: No major complications were encountered during the procedure. The anterior screw at T11 was removed from posteriorly, and the PSO was completed successfully. Postoperative recovery was without incident, and the patient was very satisfied with her results. CONCLUSION: This technique describes a novel, safe, and effective method to deal with anterior instrumentation from the posterior approach while performing posterior-based osteotomies for rigid spinal deformities.