Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective comparative study.

Patients with combined choledocholithiasis and cholecystitis require treatment of both diseases. The aim of our study was to analyze perioperative results of next-day (< 24 h) vs. early (> 24 h) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones. We conducted a retrospective study of patients that underwent LC after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis, with combined diagnoses of common bile duct stones (with or without acute cholangitis) and gallbladder stones (with acute or chronic cholecystitis). From January 2014 to May 2017, 87 patients underwent LC after endoscopic sphincterotomy: 40 patients within 24 h (NDLC) and 47 after 24 h (ELC). Regarding pre-ERCP diagnosis, 29 (72.5%) of patients in the NDLC group and 33 (70.2%) of patients in the ELC group had high-risk of choledocholithiasis (p = 0.814), acute cholecystitis (32.5 vs. 25.5%, p = 0.474) and acute cholangitis (17.5 vs. 17%, p = 0.953). The median time from ERCP to LC was 23 h (IQR 22-23) in the NDLC group and 72 h (IQR 48-80) in the ELC group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in regard to operative time, estimated blood loss, overall morbidity and rate of conversion to open surgery. Patients in the NDLC group had a shorter total length of stay (2 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within the first 24 h after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis is safe and feasible, without increased postoperative morbidity and associated with reduction of the hospital length of stay.

A New Era of Bile Duct Repair: Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hepaticojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: Despite scientific evidence of the safety, efficacy, and in some cases superiority of minimally invasive surgery in hepato-pancreato-biliary procedures, there are scarce publications about bile duct repairs. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery on bile duct repair in patients with post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury. METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative study of our prospectively collected database of patients with bile duct injury who underwent robotic or laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy. RESULTS: Seventy-five bile duct repairs (40 by laparoscopic and 35 by robotic-assisted surgery) were treated from 2012 to 2018. Injury types were as follows: E1 (7.5% vs. 14.3%), E2 (22.5% vs. 14.3%), E3 (40% vs. 42.9%), E4 (22.5% vs. 28.6%), and E5 (7.5% vs. 0), for laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (LHJ) and robotic-assisted hepaticojejunostomy (RHJ) respectively. The overall morbidity rate was similar (LHJ 27.5% vs. RHJ 22.8%, P = 0.644), during an overall median follow-up of 28 (14-50) months. In the LHJ group, the actuarial primary patency rate was 92.5% during a median follow-up of 49 (43.2-56.8) months. While in the RHJ group, the actuarial primary patency rate was 100%, during a median follow-up of 16 (12-22) months. The overall primary patency rate was 96% (LHJ 92.5% vs. RHJ 100%, log-rank P = 0.617). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the robotic approach is similar to the laparoscopic regarding safety and efficacy in attaining primary patency for bile duct repair.

Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct injury.

BACKGROUND: The Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System has positioned itself as a tool that improves the ergonomics of the surgeon, facilitating dissection in confined spaces and enhancing the surgeon's skills. The technical aspects for successful bile duct repair are well-vascularized ducts, tension-free anastomosis, and complete drainage of hepatic segments, and all are achievable with robotic-assisted approach. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of our prospectively collected database of patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury who underwent robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Pre-, intra-, and short-term postoperative data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 30 consecutive patients were included. The median age was 46.5 years and 76.7% were female. Neo-confluences with section of hepatic segment IV were performed in 7 patients (those classified as Strasberg E4). In the remaining 23, a Hepp-Couinaud anastomosis was built. There were no intraoperative complications, the median estimated blood loss was 100 mL, and the median operative time was 245 min. No conversion was needed. The median length of stay was 6 days and the median length of follow-up was 8 months. The overall morbidity rate was 23.3%. Two patients presented hepaticojejunostomy leak. No mortality was registered. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery is feasible and can be safely performed, with acceptable short-term results, in bile duct injury repair providing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Further studies with larger number of cases and longer follow-up are needed to establish the role of robotic assisted approaches in the reconstruction of BDI.

Minimally invasive approach (robotic and laparoscopic) to biliary-enteric fistula secondary to cholecystectomy bile duct injury.

Spontaneous biliary-enteric fistula after laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injury is an extremely rare entity. Y-en-Roux hepaticojejunostomy has been demonstrated to be an effective surgical technique to repair iatrogenic bile duct injuries. Seven consecutive patients underwent robotic-assisted (n = 5) and laparoscopic (n = 2) biliary-enteric fistula resection and bile duct repair at our hospital from January 2012 to May 2017. We reported our technique and described post-procedural outcomes. The mean age was 52.4 years, mostly females (n = 5). The mean operative time was 240 min for laparoscopic cases and 322 min for robotic surgery, and the mean estimated blood loss was 300 mL for laparoscopic and 204 mL for robotic cases. In both groups, oral feeding was resumed between day 2 or 3 and hospital length of stay was 4-8 days. Immediate postoperative outcomes were uneventful in all patients. With a median of 9 months of follow-up (3-52 months), no patients developed anastomosis-related complications. We observed in this series an adequate identification and dissection of the fistulous biliary-enteric tract, a safe closure of the fistulous orifice in the gastrointestinal tract and a successful bile duct repair, providing the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

[Surgical and medical treatment outcome of enterocutaneus fistulas]. / Resultados del tratamiento médico-quirúrgico de las fistulas enterocutáneas.

INTRODUCTION: Enterocutaneous fistulas are an important complication of gastrointestinal surgery. Most of the cases (75% to 85%) are secondary to postoperative complications and are related to a high morbi-mortality rate, mainly sepsis, malnutrition and fluid and electrolyte imbalance. The aim of this study is to describe the main causes of enterocutaneous fistulas and morbi-mortality associated to treatment in the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. METHODS: Retrospective, observational and longitudinal study. Clinical records of patients with enterocutaneous fistula from January 1999 to December 2003 were reviewed. RESULTS: 51 patients were identified; median age was 45 years (interval 20 to 79 years). Fistula resulted from surgery in 49 cases (96%). A combined therapy of total parenteral nutrition and low residue diet were used in 28 patients (55%). Surgery was performed as definitive treatment in 29 patients (57%). Indications for surgery were: failure to medical treatment in 25 patients (59%) and a persistent high output in 4 (8%). The median of postoperative hospitalization was 11 days (interval 3 to 96 days) and the median of lenght of stay was 30 days (interval 40 to 130 days). There was no mortality. CONCLUSION: Enterocutaneous fistulas require long time of hospitalization. More than 50% of patients need surgery as final treatment.

[First experience in surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using the PPH stapler]. / Experiencia inicial en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la enfermedad hemorroidal con la engrapadora PPH.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoidal disease is a frequent entity worldwide. The surgical management is indicated in third or fourth degree internal hemorrhoidal disease. The conventional hemorrhoidectomy has showed good results but the severe postoperative pain is an important complain. Currently diverse surgical alternatives have been described, mainly to avoid the postoperative pain that follows surgical hemorrhoidectomy. One of these new options is the stapled hemorrhoidectomy using the PPH stapler. This procedure may produce less postoperative pain, with a shorter inpatient stay and faster return to work. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to analyze the results of using the Procedure for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids (PPH) as treatment in Hemorrhoidal Disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an observational and descriptive study, where 17 patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidectomy with PPH procedure, between March 2000 and August 2003. RESULTS: 52.8% of this patients presented grade three internal hemorrhoids and 47.2% grade four; 52.9% presented mild postoperative pain; 41.2% moderate and 5.9% severe pain. In a short and median follow up, due to the persistence of hemorrhoidal disease symptoms two patients required surgical re-intervention. Two more patients presented incontinency. One patient presented stenosis in the line of staples treated satisfactory with an anal dilatation session. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PPH is a feasible and safe procedure and it could be a surgical alternative in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, even before than conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

Experiencia inicial en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la enfermedad hemorroidal con la engrapadora PPH / First experience in surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using the PPH stapler

Background. Haemorrhoidal disease is a frequent entity worldwide. The surgical management is indicated in third or fourth degree internal hemorrhoidal disease. The conventional hemorrhoidectomy has showed good results but the severe postoperative pain is an important complain. Currently diverse surgical alternatives have been described, mainly to avoid the postoperative pain that follows surgical hemorrhoidectomy. One of these new options is the stapled hemorrhoidectomy using the PPH stapler. This procedure may produce less postoperative pain, with a shorter inpatient stay and faster return to work. Objective. The aim of this paper is to analyze the results of using the Procedure for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids (PPH) as treatment in Hemorrhoidal Disease. Material and methods. This is an observational and descriptive study, where 17 patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidectomy with PPH procedure, between march 2000 and august 2003. Results. 52.8% of this patients presented grade three internal hemorrhoids and 47.2% grade four; 52.9% presented mild postoperative pain; 41.2% moderate and 5.9% severe pain. In a short and median follow up, due to the persistence of hemorrhoidal disease symptoms two patients required surgical re-intervention. Two more patients presented incontinency. One patient presented stenosis in the line of staples treated satisfactory with an anal dilatation session. Conclusions. The use of PPH is a feasible and safe procedure and it could be a surgical alternative in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, even before than conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

Introducción. La enfermedad hemorroidal tiene una prevalencia elevada en nuestro medio. El tratamiento quirúrgico está indicado cuando se presenta enfermedad hemorroidal interna grado III y IV. La hemorroidectomía convencional ha demostrado tener buenos resultados; sin embargo, el dolor postoperatorio es un inconveniente frecuente. Por ello se han propuesto otras alternativas entre las que se encuentra la hemorroidectomía con engrapadora (PPH), que puede ocasionar menor dolor postoperatorio y una recuperación más rápida. Objetivo. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los resultados a corto y mediano plazos del uso de la engrapadora PPH en la enfermedad hemorroidal. Material y métodos. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo y observacional de 17 pacientes sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico con engrapadora PPH entre marzo de 2000 a agosto de 2003. Resultados. De los pacientes, 52.8% presentó hemorroides internas grado III y 47.2% grado IV. Presentaron dolor mínimo postoperatorio, 52.9%; 41.2% moderado y 5.9% dolor intenso. Debido a persistencia sintomática dos pacientes fueron reintervenidos quirúrgicamente. Dos más presentaron incontinencia. Un paciente presentó estenosis en la línea de grapas, tratado satisfactoriamente mediante una sesión de dilatación anal. Conclusiones. El empleo de la engrapadora PPH es un método factible y seguro que puede proponerse como una alternativa de elección antes de la hemorroidectomía convencional.

[Morbi-mortality related to ileostomy and colostomy closure]. / Morbimortalidad asociada al cierre de ileostomía y colostomía en asa.

INTRODUCTION: The main goal of gastrointestinal stomas is to divert the faecal stream from technically difficult anastomoses or intestinal obstruction. Current tendency is to avoid definitive stomas, temporary loop stomas are commonly used to protect high risk anastomosis or sections of the distal bowel. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the morbi-mortality after loop stomas closure. METHODS: Retrolective, observational and comparative study was conducted. The files of patients submitted to loop ileostomy or colostomy closure from 1981 to 2001 were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed by the Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: From a total of 107 procedures included, 73% were ileostomy closures and 27% colostomy closures. The mean age was 46 years (14-88). Protection of anastomoses was the most common indication in both stoma groups. The colostomy group had a larger interval days between stoma creation and closure than the ileostomy group (172.3 days vs. 125.6 days p = 0.008). Stoma closure was performed by hand sewn sutures in 81.3% patients and by stapled technique in 19.7% patients. The mean operative time for stoma closure was higher for colostomy group than for ileostomy (108.1 min vs. 88.3 min, p = 0.04). Colostomy group patients required a midline abdominal incisions more often than ileostomy group (21.4 vs. 2.5% p = 0.04). Morbidity rates were 7.6% for the ileostomy group and 10.3% for the colostomy group. Colostomy closure required a longer length of stay. There was no mortality. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that stoma closure was a well tolerated procedure with low morbidity and no mortality rates. The result suggest that ileostomy closure is a simpler procedure.