RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Basosquamous carcinoma (BSC) is an uncommon and malignant subtype of non-melanoma skin cancer. It has features that are halfway between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). CASE PRESENTATION: An 87-year-old female presented with a lesion on her left cheek, nasal ala, medial canthal area, and eyelids. After investigations, which included biopsies and a computed tomography scan (CT), surgery was decided upon to completely remove the mass. A 5 × 4 cm defect after the surgery was reconstructed by mobilizing three flaps, including the McGregor flap, VY glabellar flap, and nasolabial laterally based cheek flap. The excisional biopsy detected malignancy at the lateral border of the upper lid, which led to the patient undergoing surgery to remove the tumor formation. After the second surgery, the histopathology confirmed no malignancy. The patient had functionally and aesthetically pleasing results, preserved eyelid movement and visual field. No surgical complications or recurrences occurred within the first year after the surgery. DISCUSSION: BSC is a neoplasm without well-defined histologic characteristics or standardized treatment procedures compared to other non-melanoma skin cancers. However, several studies recommend using wide excision. In our case, Reconstructing the area was challenging due to important anatomical structures and finding tissue that matches the desired appearance, while preserving functional and aesthetic results. CONCLUSION: In this case report, we highlight the value of reconstructing face defects after wide excision due to BSC using three flaps.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The care of tibial traumatic fractures brought on by shelling injuries is extremely difficult, as these fractures are frequently comminuted, leading to a bone defect, extensive soft tissue damage, and an increased risk of bacterial contamination. CASE PRESENTATION: A 13-year-old male presented with trauma to the right leg following a shelling injury. He had a Gustilo IIIa open fracture with soft tissue destruction and a 7.5 cm bone loss in the distal region of the tibial shaft. Neurovascular exams were unremarkable. Primary treatment by external fixation, wound debridement, and simple suture closure was achieved. After the external fixator was removed, distraction osteogenesis was performed to deal with the bone loss. The surgical technique chosen was transport over a flexible intramedullary nail. By the end of both distraction and consolidation phases, the patient was healed with no complications, deformities, or length discrepancies. DISCUSSION: The objective of treating tibial shelling wounds is to restore functionality and save the patient's life and limb. Neurovascular evaluation, early bone fixation, and wound care are the basic treatment. Many techniques of distraction osteogenesis can be used to restore bone loss. With lower external fixation time and complications, transport over a nail is an important one. However, using a rigid intramedullary nail in children is contraindicated, so a flexible one was used. CONCLUSION: In this case report, we highlight the value of proper management of open leg fractures and the importance of restoring bone loss to improve the quality of life for war victims, particularly children.
