Gadolinium-based contrast media compared with iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in azotaemic patients.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether gadolinium-based contrast media (CM) could be used safely for angiographies in patients with renal dysfunction we investigated renal function after gadobutrol exposure and compared the results with standard iodinated CM (iohexol) in a randomized clinical study. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (aged 67+/-11 years, nine female and 12 male) with severely impaired renal function [mean serum creatinine 3.2+/-1.3 mg/dl, mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 31+/-16 ml/min/1.73 m(2)] who needed to have angiography because of severe peripheral vascular disease, renal artery stenosis or aortic aneurysms were randomized to receive in a blinded manner either gadobutrol (Gadovist 1.0 mmol/ml) or iohexol (Omnipaque 350) as contrast agents. GFR was measured by CM clearance (Renalyzer) at baseline and 48 h after CM administration. The primary end point was the mean change of GFR from baseline at 48 h, the secondary one the incidence of CM-induced acute renal failure, defined as a decrease in GFR of >50% from baseline within 48 h of CM administration. RESULTS: In the gadobutrol group (n = 10) we observed a statistically significant decrease in GFR of 10.6+/-13.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) within 48 h after CM administration (P<0.05, paired t test). The incidence of CM-induced ARF amounted to 50%. In comparison, the iohexol group (n = 11) also showed a statistically significant GFR reduction of 8.7+/-8.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (P<0.05, paired t test), and of ARF by 45%. The percentile of differences of GFR decreases between the two groups was not significant (P = 0.70). No patient demonstrated other adverse effects of gadobutrol or iohexol administration, apart from GFR reduction. Despite the decline in GFR, no patient required haemodialysis in the 10 following days. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, gadolinium-based angiography showed no benefit over iohexol angiography with respect to preventing GFR reduction in patients with severely impaired renal function.

Reduction of proteinuria; combined effects of receptor blockade and low dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.

OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) show an antiproteinuric and thus nephroprotective effect in patients suffering from glomerulonephritis. Angiotensin II-receptor-antagonists (AT1RA) are also efficacious in reducing proteinuria. The study was performed to investigate the antiproteinuric effect of AT1RA candesartan in patients diagnosed with chronic glomerulonephritis by biopsy, and who were already being treated with an ACEI. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with a persistent proteinuria of at least 1 g/day who were already being treated with an ACEI for more than 3 months were included. The study was performed using a double-blind, placebo-controlled and randomized method with two treatment periods of 8 weeks (placebo or candesartan 8 mg/day) and a wash-out period of 4 weeks in between. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were measured by inulin- and PAH-clearances at the beginning and the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: Proteinuria significantly decreased from 2 +/- 0.4 g/day to 1.3 +/- 0.3 g/day (P < 0.05) with the addition of candesartan treatment, whereas it remained unchanged (from 1.8 +/- 0.3 g/day to 1.9 +/- 0.3 g/day) under placebo. GFR (candesartan: from 66 +/- 13 to 58 +/- 11 ml/min per 1.73 m2, placebo: from 64 +/- 11 to 62 +/- 13 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and ERPF (candesartan: from 329 +/- 44 to 304 +/- 37 ml/min per 1.73 m2, placebo: from 362 +/- 48 to 315 +/- 46 ml/min per 1.73 m2) did not alter significantly after 8 weeks of treatment. The addition of candesartan treatment significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (from 129 +/- 3 to 123 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (from 79 +/- 2 to 76 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.05) compared with placebo (systolic: 128 +/- 3 to 127 +/- 3 mmHg, diastolic: 79 +/- 2 to 79 +/- 2 mmHg). CONCLUSION: Candesartan promotes a complementary antiproteinuric and a small antihypertensive effect after a treatment period of 8 weeks in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis when given in conjunction with an ACEI. Renal hemodynamics did not vary significantly.

Changes in renal and systemic hemodynamics after NO-synthase inhibition in males with family history of hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in the regulation of blood pressure and renal hemodynamics. METHODS: To further investigate the role of NO in human hypertension, we studied the effect of systemic injection of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) on renal hemodynamics, urinary sodium excretion (FE(Na)), systemic hemodynamics and several vasoactive hormones in 5 healthy male subjects with (group H) and without (group N) family history of hypertension. An intravenous infusion of L-NMMA (3 mg/kg over 10 min) or placebo was given in a randomized, double-blinded manner. GFR and ERPF were measured by inulin- and PAH-clearances. Norepinephrine infusion (0.1 microg/kg/min over 60 min) served as vasoconstrictive control infusion. RESULTS: L-NMMA induced a significant decrease in ERPF (-135 +/- 49 vs. 7 +/- 31 ml/min/1.73 m(2) with placebo, p < 0.05), a decrease in FE(Na) (-1.2 +/- 0.6% with L-NMMA vs. 0.0 +/- 0.1% with placebo), and a significant increase in diastolic blood pressure (+7 +/- 1 vs. -2 +/- 1 mm Hg with placebo) in group N, only. A sustained drop in plasma renin activity (-0.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.1 ng/ml/h with placebo) could also be seen in this group, only. Subjects with family history of hypertension showed minor or even no response (changes in diastolic blood pressure: L-NMMA: 5 +/- 3 mm Hg, placebo: 0 +/- 2 mm Hg; changes in ERPF: L-NMMA: -89 +/- 57 ml/min/1.73 m(2), placebo: -34 +/- 28 ml/min/1.73 m(2); changes in plasma renin activity: L-NMMA: -0.0 +/- 0.3 ng/ml/h, placebo: -0.1 +/- 0.2 ng/ml/h). The vasoconstrictive effect of norepinephrine infusion did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that systemic NO synthetase inhibition by L-NMMA results in a blunted effect on systemic blood pressure and the renal hemodynamic system in subjects with family history of hypertension.