¿Cómo diagnosticamos la diverticulitis aguda? Resultados de una encuesta nacional sobre el papel de las técnicas de imagen / How do we diagnose acute diverticulitis? Results of a national survey about the role of imaging techniques

Introducción: La elección de las técnicas de imagen en el diagnóstico de la diverticulitis aguda (DA) es un motivo de controversia. Los objetivos del estudio fueron conocer las preferencias de los radiólogos y el grado de utilización de las distintas técnicas en su manejo radiológico. Métodos: Se difundió una encuesta por Internet a través de la Sociedad Española de Diagnóstico por Imagen del Abdomen (SEDIA) y Twitter, con preguntas sobre ámbito de trabajo, protocolización, preferencias personales y la realidad asistencial en el manejo radiológico de la DA. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 186 respuestas. El 72% de los radiólogos encuestados trabaja en servicios organizados por «órgano y sistema» (S-OS). Existe protocolo de manejo de DA en un el 48% de los servicios, siendo en el 47,5% la ecografía la técnica de inicio. El 73% de los encuestados cree que la ecografía debería ser la primera opción diagnóstica, pero en realidad esto solo se efectúa en un 24% de los servicios, realizándose tomografía computarizada en el 32,8%, con diferencias significativas en horario de guardia. La clasificación más utilizada es la de Hinchey (75%). El 96% de los encuestados desearía un consenso de especialidad para utilizar la misma clasificación. Existe mayor tasa de protocolización, utilización de clasificaciones y mayor creencia en la ecografía como técnica inicial en S-OS y en hospitales con más de 500 camas. Conclusiones: Hay una gran variabilidad en el manejo radiológico de la DA, con divergencias en los protocolos utilizados y entre las opiniones de los radiólogos y la práctica clínica real.(AU)

Introduction: The choice of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis is controversial. This study aimed to determine radiologists’ preferences for different imaging techniques in the management of acute diverticulitis and the extent to which they use the different radiologic techniques for this purpose. Methods: An online survey was disseminated through the Spanish Society of Abdominal Imaging (Sociedad Española de Diagnóstico por Imagen del Abdomen (SEDIA)) and Twitter. The survey included questions about respondents’ working environments, protocolization, personal preferences, and actual practice in the radiological management of acute diverticulitis. Results: A total of 186 responses were obtained, 72% from radiologists working in departments organized by organ/systems. Protocols for managing acute diverticulitis were in force in 48% of departments. Ultrasonography was the initial imaging technique in 47.5%, and 73% of the respondents considered that ultrasonography should be the first-choice technique; however, in practice, ultrasonography was the initial imaging technique in only 24% of departments. Computed tomography was the first imaging technique in 32.8% of departments, and its use was significantly more common outside normal working hours. The most frequently employed classification was the Hinchey classification (75%). Nearly all (96%) respondents expressed a desire for a consensus within the specialty about using the same classification. Hospitals with>500 beds and those organized by organ/systems had higher rates of protocolization, use of classifications, and belief that ultrasonography is the best first-line imaging technique. Conclusions: The radiologic management of acute diverticulitis varies widely, with differences in the protocols used, radiologists’ opinions, and actual clinical practice.(AU)

How do we diagnose acute diverticulitis? Results of a national survey about the role of imaging techniques.

INTRODUCTION: The choice of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis is controversial. This study aimed to determine radiologists' preferences for different imaging techniques in the management of acute diverticulitis and the extent to which they use the different radiologic techniques for this purpose. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated through the Spanish Society of Abdominal Imaging (Sociedad Española de Diagnóstico por Imagen del Abdomen (SEDIA)) and Twitter. The survey included questions about respondents' working environments, protocolization, personal preferences, and actual practice in the radiological management of acute diverticulitis. RESULTS: A total of 186 responses were obtained, 72% from radiologists working in departments organized by organ/systems. Protocols for managing acute diverticulitis were in force in 48% of departments. Ultrasonography was the initial imaging technique in 47.5%, and 73% of the respondents considered that ultrasonography should be the first-choice technique; however, in practice, ultrasonography was the initial imaging technique in only 24% of departments. Computed tomography was the first imaging technique in 32.8% of departments, and its use was significantly more common outside normal working hours. The most frequently employed classification was the Hinchey classification (75%). Nearly all (96%) respondents expressed a desire for a consensus within the specialty about using the same classification. Hospitals with >500 beds and those organized by organ/systems had higher rates of protocolization, use of classifications, and belief that ultrasonography is the best first-line imaging technique. CONCLUSIONS: The radiologic management of acute diverticulitis varies widely, with differences in the protocols used, radiologists' opinions, and actual clinical practice.

Classification of acute diverticulitis in the left colon with ultrasonography and computed tomography: Value of current severity classification schemes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The current management of acute diverticulitis of the left colon (ADLC) requires tests with high prognostic value. This paper analyzes the usefulness of ultrasonography (US) in the initial diagnosis of ADLC and the validity of current classifications schemes for ADLC. PATIENTS: This retrospective observational study included patients with ADLC scheduled to undergo US or computed tomography (CT) following a clinical algorithm. According to the imaging findings, ADLC was classified as mild, locally complicated, or complicated. We analyzed the efficacy of US in the initial diagnosis and the reasons why CT was used as the first-line technique. We compared the findings with published classifications schemes for ADLC. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients were diagnosed with acute diverticulitis; 183 had ADLC, classified at imaging as mild in 104, locally complicated in 60, and complicated in 19. The diagnosis was reached by US alone in 98 patients, by CT alone in 77, and by combined US and CT in 8. The main reasons for using CT as the first-line technique were the radiologist's lack of experience in abdominal US and the unavailability of a radiologists on call. Six patients diagnosed by US were reexamined by CT, but the classification changed in only three. None of the published classification schemes included all the imaging findings. CONCLUSIONS: US should be the first-line imaging technique in patients with suspected ADLC. Various laboratory and imaging findings are useful in establishing the prognosis of ADLC. New schemes to classify the severity of ADLC are necessary to ensure optimal clinical decision making.

Categorización de la diverticulitis aguda de colon izquierdo mediante ecografía y tomografía computarizada. Valor de las clasificaciones de gravedad disponibles / Classification of acute diverticulitis in the left colon with ultrasonography and computed tomography: value of current severity classification schemes

Antecedentes y objetivoEl manejo actual de la diverticulitis aguda de colon izquierdo requiere pruebas con alto valor pronóstico. Los objetivos del estudio son analizar la utilidad de la ecografía como método diagnóstico inicial y evaluar la validez de las clasificaciones actuales de gravedad de dicha enfermedad.PacientesEstudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes con diverticulitis aguda de colon izquierdo. Se solicitó ecografía o tomografía computarizada (TC) siguiendo un algoritmo clínico. Tras los hallazgos de imagen, se clasificó la enfermedad como leve, localmente complicada y complicada. Se evaluaron la eficacia de la ecografía como herramienta diagnóstica inicial y las razones por las que se realizó una TC como técnica inicial. Se compararon los hallazgos con las clasificaciones de diverticulitis publicadas.ResultadosDe 311 pacientes con diverticulitis aguda, se seleccionaron 183 con diverticulitis aguda de colon izquierdo, que fueron clasificadas por imagen como leves (104), localmente complicadas (60) y complicadas (19). En 98 pacientes, el diagnóstico se realizó por ecografía, en 77 por TC y en 8 mediante ambas. Las principales razones de utilización inicial de TC fueron falta de experiencia del radiólogo en ecografía abdominal y falta de disponibilidad de un radiólogo de guardia. A 6 pacientes diagnosticados por ecografía se les realizó una nueva evaluación por TC, pero solo en 3 cambió la clasificación. Ninguna de las clasificaciones publicadas recoge todos los hallazgos en imagen.ConclusionesLa ecografía debería ser la primera técnica a utilizar para el diagnóstico de diverticulitis aguda de colon izquierdo. Para establecer el pronóstico de la enfermedad, son útiles diversos parámetros analíticos y hallazgos de imagen. Para una apropiada toma de decisión terapéutica se necesitarían nuevas clasificaciones de gravedad. (AU)

Background and aimsThe current management of acute diverticulitis of the left colon (ADLC) requires tests with high prognostic value. This paper analyzes the usefulness of ultrasonography (US) in the initial diagnosis of ADLC and the validity of current classifications schemes for ADLC.PatientsThis retrospective observational study included patients with ADLC scheduled to undergo US or computed tomography (CT) following a clinical algorithm. According to the imaging findings, ADLC was classified as mild, locally complicated, or complicated. We analyzed the efficacy of US in the initial diagnosis and the reasons why CT was used as the first-line technique. We compared the findings with published classifications schemes for ADLC.ResultsA total of 311 patients were diagnosed with acute diverticulitis; 183 had ADLC, classified at imaging as mild in 104, locally complicated in 60, and complicated in 19. The diagnosis was reached by US alone in 98 patients, by CT alone in 77, and by combined US and CT in 8. The main reasons for using CT as the first-line technique were the radiologist's lack of experience in abdominal US and the unavailability of a radiologists on call. Six patients diagnosed by US were reexamined by CT, but the classification changed in only three. None of the published classification schemes included all the imaging findings.ConclusionsUS should be the first-line imaging technique in patients with suspected ADLC. Various laboratory and imaging findings are useful in establishing the prognosis of ADLC. New schemes to classify the severity of ADLC are necessary to ensure optimal clinical decision making. (AU)

¿Qué hemos aprendido de las encuestas de la AEC, AECP y del Observatorio de Infección en Cirugía? Cumplimiento de las medidas de prevención de infección postoperatoria y comparación con las recomendaciones de la AEC / What have we learned from the surveys of the AEC, AECP and the Observatory of Infection in Surgery? Compliance with postoperative infection prevention measures and comparison with the AEC recommendations

Antes de planificar estrategias de mejora, es crucial conocer el grado de implementación de las medidas preventivas de infección postoperatoria. Se presentan los resultados agregados de 3encuestas realizadas por el Observatorio de Infección en Cirugía a miembros de 11 asociaciones de cirugía y de enfermería quirúrgica. Las preguntas fueron dirigidas a determinar el conocimiento de la evidencia científica, las creencias personales y el uso real de las principales medidas. De 2.295 encuestados, el 45,1% no recibe información de la tasa de infección de su unidad. Se observó un conocimiento insuficiente de algunas de las principales recomendaciones de prevención y unas tasas de utilización, en ocasiones, inquietante. Se indagó sobre las estrategias preferidas para mejorar el cumplimiento de las pautas preventivas y su grado de implementación. Se confirmó la brecha existente entre la evidencia científica y la práctica clínica en la prevención de infecciones en diferentes especialidades quirúrgicas (AU)

Before planning improvement strategies, it is crucial to know the degree of implementation of preventative measures for postoperative infection. The aggregated results of 3surveys carried out by the Observatory of Infection in Surgery to members of 11 associations of surgeons and perioperative nurses are presented. The questions were aimed to determine the knowledge of the scientific evidence, personal beliefs and the actual use of the main measures. Of 2295 respondents, 45.1% did not receive feedback on the infection rate of their unit. Insufficient knowledge of some of the main prevention recommendations and some disturbing rates of use were observed. The preferred strategies to improve compliance with preventive guidelines and their degree of implementation were investigated. A gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice in the prevention of infection in different surgical specialties was confirmed (AU)

Interhospital Sepsis Code in Catalonia (Spain): Territorial model for initial care of patients with sepsis. / Código Sepsis Interhospitalario en Catalunya: modelo organizativo territorial para la atención inicial al paciente con sepsis.

Sepsis is a syndromic entity with high prevalence and mortality. The management of sepsis is standardized and exhibits time-dependent efficiency. However, the management of patients with sepsis is complex. The heterogeneity of the forms of presentation can make it difficult to detect and manage such cases, in the same way as differences in training, professional competences or the availability of health resources. The Advisory Commission for Patient Care with Sepsis (CAAPAS), comprising 7 scientific societies, the Emergency Medical System (SEM) and the Catalan Health Service (CatSalut), have developed the Interhospital Sepsis Code (CSI) in Catalonia (Spain). The general objective of the CSI is to increase awareness, promote early detection and facilitate initial care and interhospital coordination to attend septic patients in a homogeneous manner throughout Catalonia.

Preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with poor outcomes. However, the role of P. aeruginosa in surgical site infections after colorectal surgery has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive factors and outcomes of surgical site infections caused by P. aeruginosa after colorectal surgery, with special emphasis on the role of preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted an observational, multicenter, prospective cohort study of all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at 10 Spanish hospitals (2011-2014). A logistic regression model was used to identify predictive factors for P. aeruginosa surgical site infections. RESULTS: Out of 3701 patients, 669 (18.1%) developed surgical site infections, and 62 (9.3%) of these were due to P. aeruginosa. The following factors were found to differentiate between P. aeruginosa surgical site infections and those caused by other microorganisms: American Society of Anesthesiologists' score III-IV (67.7% vs 45.5%, p = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.44-4.39), National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index 1-2 (74.2% vs 44.2%, p < 0.001, OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.01-6.56), duration of surgery ≥75thpercentile (61.3% vs 41.4%, p = 0.003, OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.31-3.83) and oral antibiotic prophylaxis (17.7% vs 33.6%, p = 0.01, OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.83). Patients with P. aeruginosa surgical site infections were administered antibiotic treatment for a longer duration (median 17 days [interquartile range (IQR) 10-24] vs 13d [IQR 8-20], p = 0.015, OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.00-1.12), had a higher treatment failure rate (30.6% vs 20.8%, p = 0.07, OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.96-2.99), and longer hospitalization (median 22 days [IQR 15-42] vs 19d [IQR 12-28], p = 0.02, OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.00-1.17) than those with surgical site infections due to other microorganisms. Independent predictive factors associated with P. aeruginosa surgical site infections were the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index 1-2 (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.03-5.40) and the use of oral antibiotic prophylaxis (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.23-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that surgical site infections due to P. aeruginosa are associated with a higher National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index, poor outcomes, and lack of preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis. These findings can aid in establishing specific preventive measures and appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment.

Multistate modelling to estimate excess length of stay and risk of death associated with organ/space infection after elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Accounting for time-dependency and competing events are strongly recommended to estimate excess length of stay (LOS) and risk of death associated with healthcare-associated infections. AIM: To assess the effect of organ/space (OS) surgical site infection (SSI) on excess LOS and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery (ECS). METHODS: A multicentre prospective adult cohort undergoing ECS, January 2012 to December 2014, at 10 Spanish hospitals was used. SSI was considered the time-varying exposure and defined as incisional (superficial and deep) or OS. Discharge alive and death were the study endpoints. The mean excess LOS was estimated using a multistate model which provided a weighted average based on the states patients passed through. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the effect of OS-SSI on risk of discharge alive or in-hospital mortality. FINDINGS: Of 2778 patients, 343 (12.3%) developed SSI: 194 (7%) OS-SSI and 149 (5.3%) incisional SSI. Compared to incisional SSI or no infection, OS-SSI prolonged LOS by 4.2 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.1-4.3) and 9 days (8.9-9.1), respectively, reduced the risk of discharge alive (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.36 (95% CI: 0.28-0.47) and aHR: 0.17 (0.14-0.21), respectively), and increased the risk of in-hospital mortality (aHR: 8.02 (1.03-62.9) and aHR: 10.7 (3.7-30.9), respectively). CONCLUSION: OS-SSI substantially extended LOS and increased risk of death in patients undergoing ECS. These results reinforce OS-SSI as the SSI with the highest health burden in ECS.

Predictive factors for early- and late-onset surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. A multicentre, prospective, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in Europe. However, the risk factors for the development of early-onset (EO) and late-onset (LO) SSI have not been elucidated. AIM: This study investigated the predictive factors for EO-SSI and LO-SSI in a large cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively followed-up adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in 10 hospitals (2011-2014). Patients were divided into three groups: EO-SSI, LO-SSI, or no infection (no-SSI). The cut-off defining EO-SSI and LO-SSI was seven days (median time to SSI development). Different predictive factors for EO-SSI and LO-SSI were analysed, comparing each group with the no-SSI patients. FINDINGS: Of 3701 patients, 320 (8.6%) and 349 (9.4%) developed EO-SSI and LO-SSI, respectively. The rest had no-SSI. Patients with EO-SSI were mostly males, had colon surgery and developed organ-space SSI whereas LO-SSI patients frequently received chemotherapy or radiotherapy and had incisional SSI. Male sex (odds ratio (OR): 1.92; P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status >2 (OR: 1.51; P = 0.01), administration of mechanical bowel preparation (OR: 0.7; P = 0.03) and stoma creation (OR: 1.95; P < 0.001) predicted EO-SSI whereas rectal surgery (OR: 1.43; P = 0.03), prolonged surgery (OR: 1.4; P = 0.03) and previous chemotherapy (OR: 1.8; P = 0.03) predicted LO-SSI. CONCLUSION: We found distinctive predictive factors for the development of SSI before and after seven days following elective colorectal surgery. These factors could help establish specific preventive measures in each group.

Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, SSIs constitute a financial burden and negatively impact on patient quality of life (QoL). AIM: To assess, and evaluate the evidence for, the cost and health-related QoL (HRQoL) burden of SSIs across various surgical specialties in six European countries. METHODS: Electronic databases and conference proceedings were systematically searched to identify studies reporting the cost and HRQoL burden of SSIs. Studies published post 2005 in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, and the UK were eligible for data extraction. Studies were categorized by surgical specialty, and the primary outcomes were the cost of infection, economic evaluations, and HRQoL. FINDINGS: Twenty-six studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. There was a paucity of evidence in the countries of interest; however, SSIs were consistently associated with elevated costs, relative to uninfected patients. Several studies reported that SSI patients required prolonged hospitalization, reoperation, readmission, and that SSIs increased mortality rates. Only one study reported QoL evidence, the results of which demonstrated that SSIs reduced HRQoL scores (EQ-5D). Hospitalization reportedly constituted a substantial cost burden, with additional costs arising from medical staff, investigation, and treatment costs. CONCLUSION: Disparate reporting of SSIs makes direct cost comparisons difficult, but this review indicated that SSIs are extremely costly. Thus, rigorous procedures must be implemented to minimize SSIs. More economic and QoL studies are required to make accurate cost estimates and to understand the true burden of SSIs.

Post-discharge surgical site infections after uncomplicated elective colorectal surgery: impact and risk factors. The experience of the VINCat Program.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after colorectal procedures represents a measurable quality indicator of a healthcare system. There is an increasing interest in comparing SSI rates between different hospitals and countries: however, the variability of the data regarding the incidence of SSI makes this comparison difficult. For the purposes of evaluation, data collection must be standardized and must include reliable post-discharge surveillance (PDS). AIM: To determine impact and risk factors for PDS SSI after elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: VINCat is a nosocomial infection surveillance programme in Catalonia, Spain. Between 2007 and 2011, 52 hospitals joined the programme. Hospitals performed active, prospective, standardized surveillance of elective colorectal resection. PDS was implemented by a multimodal approach and was mandatory within the first 30 days after surgery. FINDINGS: During the study period, 13,661 elective colorectal procedures were included. SSI was diagnosed in 2826 (20.7%) patients, of whom 22.5% during PDS; of these, 52% required readmission. Patients with PDS SSI were younger (odds ratio: 1.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.29-1.91), predominantly female (1.40; 1.16-1.69), had more frequently undergone endoscopic procedures (1.56; 1.30-1.88) and had more incisional SSI (1.88; 1.54-2.28) than patients with in-hospital SSI. CONCLUSION: SSI rates in elective colorectal procedures at VINCat hospitals were inside the higher range of those reported by other national programmes. PDS SSI increased the overall rate of SSI, had a significant clinical impact, and accounted for almost a quarter of SSI. Younger age and laparoscopic procedures were the most relevant risk factors. Standardized multimodal PDS should be implemented for hospitals performing surveillance of colorectal surgery.

Recomendaciones en el tratamiento antibiótico empírico de la infección intraabdominal / No disponible

No disponible

Recomendaciones en el tratamientoantibiótico empírico de la infecciónintraabdominal / Recommendations in the empiric anti-infective agents of intra-abdominal infection

Un número importante de pacientes con infección intraabdominaldesarrollan estados avanzados de la infeccióny la mortalidad es todavía superior al 20%. El fracaso esmultifactorial y se relaciona con el incremento de resistenciasbacterianas, el tratamiento empírico inapropiado, la mayorcomorbilidad de los pacientes y el mal control del foco de infección.Estas guías analizan cada uno de estos problemas yproponen medidas para evitar el fracaso, basadas en la mejorevidencia científica actual (AU)

A significant number of patients with abdominal infectiondevelop advanced stages of infection and mortalityis still above 20%. Failure is multifactorial and isassociated with an increase of bacterial resitance, inappropriateempirical treatment, a higher comorbidity of patientsand poor source control of infection. These guidelinesdiscuss each of these problems and propose measuresto avoid the failure based on the best current scientificevidence (AU)

[Recommendations in the empiric anti-infective agents of intra-abdominal infection]. / Recomendaciones en el tratamiento antibiótico empírico de la infección intraabdominal.

A significant number of patients with abdominal infection develop advanced stages of infection and mortality is still above 20%. Failure is multifactorial and is associated with an increase of bacterial resistance, inappropriate empirical treatment, a higher comorbidity of patients and poor source control of infection. These guidelines discuss each of these problems and propose measures to avoid the failure based on the best current scientific evidence.

Idiopathic fibrosing pancreatitis associated with ulcerative colitis.

Idiopathic fibrosing pancreatitis has been associated with Sjögren's syndrome, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. This condition frequently develops in childhood and youth, and has also been related to ulcerative colitis and pericholangitis. Pancreatic complications have been rarely described as systemic complications of ulcerative colitis. A 25-year-old man presented with epigastric pain and jaundice. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) revealed a diffuse enlargement of the pancreas, filiform distal stenosis of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile ducts, and pancreatic duct dilatation. At operation, a rock-hard and nodular pancreas was noted. Cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, with an access loop, was successfully performed. Idiopathic fibrosing pancreatitis should be considered in young patients with obstructive jaundice, especially those affected with chronic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases. Glucocorticoid therapy would be the first-line treatment, although many patients require operation.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis: The importance of being left-handed.

Since laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard procedure for the treatment of gallstone disease, several cases have been reported in patients with situs inversus. These cases require more technically demanding procedures due to the symmetrical disposition of the anatomy. Thus, handedness could influence the performance of these operations. The two of us (L.M.O.) and (J.M.B.), a right-handed and a left-handed surgeon, respectively, placed the instruments in reverse mode from that used in orthotopic patients. The right-handed surgeon felt more impairment when dissecting with his left hand and decided to cross the instruments within the abdomen. The left-handed surgeon was able to alternate the performance of the dissection maneuvers between the right and left hands. Surgical procedures are apparently designed for right-handed surgeons and can be approached by the left-handed in alternative ways. In fact, the accommodation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to left-handedness has been described in the literature. The rare opportunity to operate in a symmetrical way allows the right-handed surgeon to understand the absence of comfort and ergonomy often experienced by left-handed colleagues.

Systemic cytokine response to hepatic resections under total vascular exclusion.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the systemic cytokine response to major liver surgery as the basis for assessing potential new treatments. DESIGN: Open prospective study. SETTING: University hospital, UK. SUBJECTS: Thirteen patients undergoing elective hepatic resections that involved total vascular exclusion of the liver. INTERVENTIONS: Blood samples were taken preoperatively, during the operation, and during the first four postoperative days. Concentrations of endotoxin, interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured. RESULTS: Endotoxin concentrations were raised in 3/13 patients before operation and in 6 patients during the postoperative period. TNFalpha concentrations were undetectable. IFN-gamma and IL-1 responses followed a low and inconclusive pattern. IL-6 was significantly increased from 6 hours after operation to the third postoperative day, peaking at 699 (+/-277) pg/ml at 24 hours (p < 0.01). The two patients who died had the highest postoperative concentrations of IL-6. CONCLUSIONS: There is a pronounced systemic response to hepatic resection under total vascular exclusion that is reflected by the increase in IL-6 concentration and correlates with the operative blood loss and postoperative outcome. This might be used as an indicator of the response to specific treatments in this type of surgery. Treatments that minimise the IL-6 response to major hepatic resection may be of value.