Stereotactic radiotherapy for bone oligometastases.

About 60-90% of cancer patients are estimated to develop bone metastases, particularly in the spine. Bone scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT ) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ) are currently used to assess metastatic bone disease; positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT ) has become more widespread in clinical practice because of its high sensitivity and specificity with about 95% diagnostic accuracy. The most common and well-known radiotracer is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG); several other PET-radiotracers are currently under investigation for different solid tumors, such as 11C or 18FDG-choline and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT for prostate cancer. In treatment planning, standard and investigational imaging modalities should be registered with the planning CT so as to best define the bone target volume. For target volume delineation of spine metastases, the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC ) of North American experts provided consensus guidelines. Single fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) doses ranged from 12 to 24 Gy; fractionated SRT administered 21-27 Gy in 3 fractions or 20-35 Gy in 5 fractions. After spine SRT, less than 5% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity. Late toxicity included the extremely rare radiation-induced myelopathy and a 14% risk of de novo vertebral compression fractures.

Anal carcinoma of the elderly treated with radiotherapy alone or with concomitant radio-chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To analyse the results achieved with radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) or radiotherapy alone (RT) in elderly patients (pts) affected with squamous cell anal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1990 to 2002, 62 pts aged > or =70 years were treated with RT (14) or RTCT (48). There were 9 stage I, 29 stage II, 11 stage IIIa and 13 stage IIIb. MMC+5FU was given concomitantly with RT in an early period, later replaced by Cddp+5FU. In the RTCT group, 36Gy were delivered to pelvic+inguinal lymph nodes, with a tumor boost (18Gy). RESULTS: Stage II fared significantly better than stage III in terms of locoregional control (LRC) but not overall survival (OS). Pts treated with RTCT had improved LRC, but not OS. LRC was 81% at 3 and 5 years for the RTCT group; the RT group had a LRC of 61% at 3 years. There were more locoregional relapses in the MMC group (29%) versus the Cddp group (19%) and in pts treated with a split (32%) versus no split (19%). No G3 acute toxicity was observed in the RT group; in the RTCT group 15 pts (31%) developed a G3+ acute toxicity. G3+ late damage occurred in 2 pts in the RT only group and in 3 pts in the RTCT group. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly people considered fit for RTCT should undergo the same schedules used for younger people. MMC or Cddp+5FU are feasible in the elderly, even without a planned split.

Breast cancer in the elderly: the role of adjuvant radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate available data on breast conserving surgery (BCS) with or without radiation therapy (RT), and alternative options (e.g. Tamoxifen alone) (Tam), focusing specifically on the older patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The MEDLINE was searched for the terms elderly, BCS, adjuvant/postoperative RT, Tamoxifen, and randomized trials from 1992 to 2002. RESULTS: Authors reviewed papers of general interest on the elderly and breast cancer (BC), meta-analysis, randomized trials on BCS+/-RT and Tam+/-surgery without RT, retrospective non-randomized trials, and reported on prognostic factors for local recurrence in BCS alone, including biomarkers, attempts made to define a low-risk group, and methods of modification of the current, protracted standard adjuvant RT course. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative RT after BCS has a firm rationale; in current clinical practice, if the BCS+RT is medically appropriate and the patient shares the choice, after a full information of the available options and their implications, it is clinically sound to propose this approach. However, there is controversy whether a subgroup of elderly patients could be safely spared: in this setting a randomized trial is clearly warranted.