Need for parenteral iron therapy after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Malabsorptive bariatric procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch expose the patient to malnutrition and commonly cause iron deficiency. The optimal replacement and monitoring method remain undetermined. To identify high-risk patients who might need intravenous iron supplementation after bariatric surgery, we evaluated bariatric surgery patients who received parenteral iron at a university hospital-affiliated hematology center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis and reviewed the records of 165 patients who had received parenteral iron from May 2004 to June 2007. Of the 165 patients, 42 bariatric surgery patients were identified. The type of bariatric procedure and menstrual status of the patients were compared. RESULTS: The average patient age was 40 years. Of the 42 patients, 2 were men and 40 were women. Of the 40 women, 32 were premenopausal and 8 were postmenopausal. The patients in the biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch group had a significantly lower hemoglobin at presentation (P = .02), relatively lower ferritin levels, and required more additional parenteral iron treatment after the initial resolution of anemia (P = .001). The premenopausal women required earlier parenteral replacement (P = .008) and were at a greater risk of anemia-related hospitalization (P = .00033). CONCLUSION: The available published studies lack any data regarding parenteral iron replacement needs after bariatric surgery. Our results have identified the need for long-term parenteral iron replacement therapy after malabsorptive bariatric procedures, especially in premenopausal women. Patients who do not respond to oral iron therapy should be referred early for parenteral iron replacement therapy to prevent anemia-related complications and to maintain patients' quality of life. Iron monitoring should continue indefinitely even after the initial repletion of iron stores and the resolution of anemia.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonmetastatic lung cancer: an analysis of 75 patients treated over 5 years.

PURPOSE: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may not be medically operable even in patients with surgically resectable disease. For patients who either refuse surgery or are medically inoperable, radiation therapy may be the best therapeutic choice. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) employs external fixation and hypofractionation to deliver a high dose per fraction of radiation to a small target volume. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of 75 patients treated over 5 years at Staten Island University Hospital as definitive treatment for NSCLC or presumed NSCLC. Patients received a median of 5 fractions of 8 Gy per fraction over 27 days. RESULTS: Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year actuarial survivals were 63%, 45%, and 17%. Patients with a gross tumor volume (GTV) less than 65 cm3 enjoyed a longer median survival (25.7 vs. 9.9 months, p < 0.003), and at 5 years, the actuarial survival for the patients with GTVs less than 65 cm3 was 24% vs. 0% for those with GTVs larger than 65 cm3. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy as delivered was ineffective for curing the patients whose GTVs were larger than 65 cm3. SBRT was promising for those with GTVs less than 65 cm3.