RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy in children. Retrospective studies show conflicting results regarding predictors of persistent and recurrent disease after initial therapy. In 2015, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) proposed a clinical classification system to identify pediatric thyroid cancer patients at risk for persistent/recurrent disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients in our registry diagnosed with papillary DTC at ≤ 18 years of age. We analyzed the prognostic performance of the ATA classification and other risk factors for predicting response to initial treatment and final outcome in pediatric DTC. RESULTS: We included 41 patients, 34 females and 7 males, diagnosed with papillary DTC at a mean (SD) age of 16.2 (1.8) years. Based on the ATA pediatric risk classification, patients were categorized as low (61%), intermediate (10%), or high risk (29%). The median follow-up period was 7.3 (1-41) years. After initial treatment, disease free status was achieved in 92%, 50%, and 42% of the low, intermediate, and high risk groups, respectively (P <0.01). At the last visit, persistent disease was present in 12%, 25%, and 33% (P=0.27). Assessing other risk factors, only the presence of distant metastases at diagnosis resulted in increased presence of persistent disease at last follow-up (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: This study supports the clinical relevance of the ATA risk classification for predicting the response to initial treatment. There was no clear prediction of long-term outcome, but this may be due to limited power caused by the small number of patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown a higher incidence of thyroid cancer in patients with insurance coverage and higher socioeconomic status (SES), and a higher thyroid cancer stage in patients with lower SES, suggesting SES-related health disparity in thyroid cancer. However, it is not known if the same is evident under a universal healthcare system such as that in Canada. METHODS: We used data from the Canadian Thyroid Cancer Consortium, a large thyroid cancer registry that collects data from two major thyroid cancer referral centers (London, Ontario, and Halifax, Nova Scotia). We included patients who presented with thyroid cancer between 1998 and 2011. We determined age at presentation, sex, and thyroid cancer status using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging criteria. Individuals' postal codes were used to retrieve data from the Canadian census for the years 1996, 2001, and 2006 to approximate household income. Ordered logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios of presenting with more advanced stage thyroid cancer as they relate to income, age, and sex. RESULTS: We included 1701 patients: 1334 cases from London and 367 from Halifax. Thyroid cancer was diagnosed more frequently in the higher SES groups (p<0.001). Compared to patients in the top income quintile, patients in the lowest and second-lowest income quintiles had significantly higher odds of having more advanced stage thyroid cancer at presentation (OR 1.58, p=0.002; 1.37, p=0.024 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that, similar to countries that lack a universal healthcare system, health disparity in thyroid cancer also exists in Canada. It appears that while thyroid cancers were diagnosed more frequently in Canadian patients of higher SES, Canadian patients in the lower SES groups had more advanced stage thyroid cancer at presentation.
