Does "Obesity Paradox" Apply for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?

BACKGROUND: Data is controversial regarding the existence of an "obesity paradox" in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). We sought to investigate the prognostic value of the body mass index (BMI) on outcomes following TAVR. METHODS: This is an observational, single-center study involving all patients who underwent TAVR from 2009 to 2019. BMI was calculated in all patients before TAVR. The cohort was subdivided into four groups: underweight (<20 kg/m2), normal weight (≥20 to <25 kg/m2), overweight (≥25 to <30 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2). The main endpoint was all-cause 30-day and one-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (mean age 79.6 ± 7.8 years, mean STS score 5.3 ± 3.6) were included. Patients were grouped as follows: underweight (n = 35, 8.5%), normal weight (n = 121, 29.4%), overweight (n = 140, 34%) and obese (n = 116, 28.1%). Obese patients were younger, included more females and had lower STS score than the rest of the cohort whereas underweight patients were older, had higher STS score, more chronic kidney disease, more left ventricular dysfunction and more often underwent non-transfemoral TAVR. BMI predicted 30-day survival (AUC:0.692 [95%CI 0.522-0.862]; p = 0.030) with an optimal cut-off of 24.4 (sensitivity = 66.6%, specificity = 63.6%). On multivariate analysis, higher BMI trended toward lower 30-day mortality (HR = 0.87 [95%CI 0.75-1.01]; p = 0.071). Thirty-day mortality was higher in the underweight group (8.3%) in comparison with other BMI subgroups (normal weight 2.5%, overweight 1.4%, obese 0.9%; p = 0.045). However, no significant difference was found after adjustment of confounders (all p = NS). BMI did not predict one-year mortality. No significant difference in one-year survival was observed between the four BMI subgroups (log rank p = 0.925). CONCLUSION: BMI could represent an interesting prognostic tool for short-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. BMI < 20 kg/m2 was associated with higher 30-day mortality. Symptoms improved similarly in obese patients compared to lower BMI patients. For 30-day survivors, no evidence of the existence of an obesity paradox was observed in this cohort.

Changes in outcomes over time in intermediate-risk patients treated for severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the practice of treating patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Heart-Teams have improved their decision-making process to refer patients to the best and safest treatment. The evidence allowed centers to increase funding and TAVR volume and extend indications to different risk categories of patients. This study evaluates the outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated for severe AS in an academic center. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2019, 812 patients with AS underwent TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). A propensity score-matching analytic strategy was used to balance groups and adjust for time periods. Outcomes were recorded according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Guidelines; the primary outcome being 30-day mortality and the secondary outcomes being perioperative course and complications. RESULTS: No difference in mortality was seen but complications differed: more postoperative transient ischemic attacks, permanent pacemaker implantations, and perivalvular leaks in the transcatheter group, while more acute kidney injuries, atrial fibrillation, delirium, postoperative infections and bleeding, tamponade and need for reoperation in the surgical group as well as a longer hospital length-of-stay. However, over the years, morbidities/mortality decreased for all patients treated for AS. CONCLUSIONS: Data showed an improvement in morbidities/mortality for intermediate-risk patients treated with SAVR or TAVR. Increased funding allowed for a higher TAVR volume by increasing access to this technology. Also, the difference in complications could impact healthcare costs. By incorporating important metrics such as length-of-stay, readmission rates, and complications into decision-making, the Heart-Team can improve clinical outcomes, healthcare economics, and resource utilization.

Online survey to assess parents' experience and preferences for follow-up visits for children living with type 1 diabetes in Quebec, Canada: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: It is accepted that although patients may initiate a visit to a healthcare provider, follow-up visits are often based on recommendations from providers. This suggests that follow-up care, since not initiated by patients, may not reflect patients' perception of a need for care. However, few studies have examined the burden of regular follow-up care and patients' perceived value of such care. For parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), follow-up visits are scheduled regardless of how well controlled the diabetes is. Our study examines how benefits and burden from the parents' perspective could affect their preferences in regard to the frequency of regular follow-up care. METHODS: We aim to develop an online patient survey to be distributed to parents of children living with T1D in the province of Quebec, Canada. The survey will be available in French and English, and distributed through diabetes clinics, on social media groups and forums for parents of children with T1D. The survey will be developed in collaboration with parents of children with T1D to ensure that it appropriately reflects the services in regular follow-up care and that the language is understandable and clear. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will be informed of the requirements and objectives of the survey at the beginning of the questionnaire and that the data collected will remain anonymous and confidential. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the research ethics committee of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval. Results of the study will be shared with relevant stakeholders with the aim of improving practices and better meeting patients' and families' needs.

Hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Central-West Tunisia: a population-based cross-sectional study.

This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence, viraemia and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in a region in Central-West Tunisia. A door-to-door cross-sectional study was conducted on a randomly selected sample. A total of 3178 individuals aged 5 to 74 years and members of 935 families were investigated. Seroprevalence of HCV was assessed using ELISA tests. The viral load was determined by real-time RT-PCR, and HCV genotyping was conducted by amplification and sequencing in the NS5b genomic region. The global prevalence of HCV antibodies was 3.32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.72-4.00). It was significantly higher in women: 4.47% vs. 2.16% in men, p = 0.001. Seroprevalence increased with age, and the highest rates were found in the 50- to 59-year-old age group (12.90%, 95% CI: 9.45-16.86), suggesting a cohort effect with very low contribution of intrafamilial transmission. Genotyping showed a predominance of subtype 1b (84.6%), with cocirculation of subtypes 2c (9.6%), 1a (1.9%), 1d (1.9%) and 2k (1.9%), similar to the previously reported genotype distribution in Tunisia and with no genetic clusters specific to the study region. These results indicate a higher endemicity of HCV infection when compared to the previously reported nationwide surveillance data. This study provides valuable data that can contribute to current strategies to eliminate hepatitis C.