Lung protective ventilation during pulmonary resection in children: a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative ventilatory strategies for lung protection in children are underexplored. This study evaluated the effects of lung protective ventilation (LPV) on postoperative clinical outcomes in children requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV) for pulmonary resection. METHODS: Children age ≤5 yr scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy or segmentectomy were randomly assigned to LPV or control ventilation. For LPV, tidal volume (VT) was 6 ml kg-1 during two-lung ventilation (TLV(VT)), 4 ml kg-1 during OLV, with 6 cm H2O PEEP maintained throughout. In the control group, TLV(VT) was 10 ml kg-1, 8 ml kg-1 during OLV, but without PEEP. The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications within 72 h after operation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative desaturation, arterial oxygen partial pressure/inspiratory fraction of oxygen (P/F) ratio >40 kPa, and development of consolidation and B-lines (assessed by lung ultrasound at the end of surgery, by an investigator masked to group allocation). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 19/110 (17.3%) children sustained pulmonary complications after surgery. LPV reduced pulmonary complications (5/55; 9.1%), compared with 14/55 (25.5%) children sustaining complications in the control group (OR=0.29 [0.10-0.88]; P=0.02). Masked ultrasound assessment showed less consolidation, and fewer B-lines, after LPV (P<0.001). Intraoperative desaturation was more common in control mode (eight/55; 14.5%), compared with 1/55 (1.8%) after LPV (OR=9.2 [1.1-76]; P=0.015). LPV maintained (P/F) ratio >40 more frequently (53/55; 96.4%) than control-mode (45/55; 81.8%) ventilation (OR=5.9 [1.2-28.3%]; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lung protective ventilation decreased postoperative pulmonary complications compared with conventional ventilation in children requiring one-lung ventilation for pulmonary resection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02680925.

Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, and Platelet Counts and Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiovascular Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative low platelet count and perioperative high neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratio are associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality after cardiac surgery. The authors investigated whether (1) their combination neutrophil/lymphocyte × platelet (N/LP) ratio is an independent predictor of AKI and postoperative mortality and (2) whether the N/LP ratio increases predictive ability compared with the N/L ratio or platelet nadir. DESIGN: This was a retrospective and observational study. SETTING: Single large university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 1,099 adult patients who underwent cardiovascular surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline clinical parameters including platelet counts, the N/L ratio, and the N/LP ratio measured before surgery, immediately after surgery, and on postoperative days 1 and 2 were obtained. Multivariable analysis revealed that the maximal N/LP ratio was an independent predictor of AKI and 5-year mortality. Propensity score matching was performed between the high and low preoperative N/LP ratio groups. Significant differences in the mortality rate and incidence of AKI also were found in the matched cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the maximal N/LP ratio as a continuous variable was significantly higher than the AUC of the maximal N/L ratio or nadir platelet as continuous variables (maximal N/LP ratio: 0.62 v N/L ratio: 0.59; p = 0.026 v platelet nadir: 0.57; p = 0.003). The AUC of multivariable risk prediction with the maximal N/LP ratio (0.77) was significantly higher than the AUC without the N/LP ratio (0.70; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: High N/LP ratios were associated with postoperative AKI and 5-year mortality. The N/LP ratio may assist with the the prediction of AKI and mortality in high-risk cardiovascular surgery.

Microcirculation measured by vascular occlusion test during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia is superior to that in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized study.

General anesthesia can affect microcirculatory properties. However, differential effects on the microcirculation according to the anesthetic technique used during thoracoscopic surgery have not been well documented. We conducted a randomized clinical trial in which the effects of desflurane and propofol, both with remifentanil, on systemic arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation were compared in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. As a subgroup analysis, we compared the effects of two commonly used anesthetic techniques, desflurane-remifentanil (n = 52) and propofol-remifentanil (n = 48), on tissue oxygen saturation using a vascular occlusion test in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Tissue oxygen saturation was higher in the desflurane than the propofol group (mean ± standard deviation, 83 ± 6 vs. 80 ± 9, 84 ± 6 vs. 76 ± 10, and 87 ± 7 vs. 77 ± 10 % at 30 and 60 min of one-lung ventilation and at two-lung ventilation; adjusted p = 0.026, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). The recovery slope during the vascular occlusion test, reflecting microvascular reperfusion adequacy, was higher in the desflurane than the propofol group during surgery (mean difference, 0.5 %/s; 95 % CI 0.0-0.9 %/s; p = 0.037). Desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia is associated with better microcirculation than propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.