Association of Hypertension and Obesity with Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy or Microalbuminuria in a General Population in South Korea

BACKGROUND: Both left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and microalbuminuria (MA) are well described markers or surrogate for cardiovascular outcome. Many factors are known to be related to the two markers which are encountered together in some patients. But the epidemiological backgrounds for the two markers are not clearly demonstrated so far. METHODS: Measurements of echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and MA were introduced to the population survey in Yangpyeong County, Korea in 2005 and 2006 for 1,767 among 2,028 subjects. The criteria for MA were 17-250 mg/g of albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) in male and 25-355 mg/g in female. 1,636 data were analyzed. RESULTS: Age was 60.9 +/- 10.4 years and the proportion of female was 59.4% (972). Body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 +/- 3.21 kg/m2 and blood pressure were 124.1 +/- 17.3 mm Hg/80.0 +/- 10.5 mm Hg. LVMI was 45.3 +/- 11.6 g/m2.7 and ACR was 23.9 +/- 150.9 mg/g. Prevalence of LVH and MA were 23.5% and 12.2%, respectively. In male/female, odds ratios for MA were 1.035 (range, 1.010-1.061)/1.01 (range, 0.988-1.032) for age, 0.962 (range, 0.882-1.049)/0.941 (range, 0.881-1.006) for BMI, 1.754 (range, 1.097-2.804)/2.158 (range, 1.413-3.298) for hypertension (HTN), 4.87 (range, 2.883-8.226)/2.154 (range, 1.311-3.539) for diabetes, 1.005 (range, 0.999-1.012)/1.007 (range, 1.002-1.012) for cholesterol, and 1.011 (range, 0.987-1.035)/1.011 (range, 0.994-1.029) for LVH. CONCLUSIONS: In a population level, even if diabetes was strongest factor for MA, HTN is also independent factor for MA in both genders.

Relationship between Clinical Factors Including Physical Activity and Job Category and Masked Effect Defined by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

BACKGROUND: Masked hypertension is well known for its poor cardiovascular outcome. But clinical clues related to the masked hypertension and/or masked effect (ME) are rarely known. Physical activity and/or job stress are related to increased daytime blood pressure (BP). This study is to identify whether ME is caused by physical activity and/or job category. METHODS: Physical activity using Actical and masked effect by clinic BP and ambulatory BP monitoring were applied to 167 person for this study. RESULTS: Age of the subjects was 54.9 +/- 9.6 and 74 subjects were female (57.4%). Field worker was 81 (48.5%) and office worker was 86 (51.5%). Clinic BP was 125.8 +/- 14.3 mmHg / 79.8 +/- 10.9 mmHg in male and 119.0 +/- 14.0 mmHg / 74.2 +/- 8.9 mmHg in female (p = 0.03). Daily energy expenditure representing physical activity was 1,831.1 +/- 420.4 kcal. ME for systolic BP was 11.0 +/- 11.1 mmHg and ME for diastolic BP was 3.9 +/- 8.0 mmHg. In multiple linear regression adjusted by smoking and antihypertensive medication showed that clinic systolic BP was the only significant factor related to the ME (beta = -0.44755, p < 0.0001 in male, beta = -0.396, p < 0.0001 in female). Physical activity or job category was not related to ME. CONCLUSIONS: Neither physical activity nor job category is related to ME. This indicates that diagnosis of the masked hypertension is not affected by physical activity or job status.