Gaze behavior during navigation with reduced acuity.

Navigating unfamiliar indoor spaces while visually searching for objects of interest is a challenge faced by people with visual impairment. We asked how restricting visual acuity of normally sighted subjects would affect visual search and navigation in a real world environment, and how their performance would compare to subjects with naturally occurring low vision. Two experiments were conducted. In the first, 8 normally sighted subjects walked along an indoor path, looking for objects placed at unpredictable intervals to the left and right of the path, and identified single letters posted on the objects. A head-mounted eye tracker was used to assess their gaze direction in the environment. For half the trials, blur foils were used to restrict visual acuity to approximately logMAR 1.65. Gaze behavior, travel time, and letter recognition accuracy were compared between blurred and unrestricted conditions. In the second experiment, the same procedure was conducted, but performance was compared between acuity-restricted normally-sighted subjects and subjects with naturally occurring low vision (mean acuity 1.09 logMAR, range 0.48-1.85 logMAR). In Experiment 1, neither Blur nor the Letter Recognition Task individually had a statistically significant effect on travel time. However, when combined, there was an interaction between the two that increased travel time by approximately 63%, relative to baseline trials. Blur modified gaze behavior such that subjects spent more time looking down toward the floor while walking, at the expense of time spent looking in other directions. During Letter Recognition Task trials with Blur, subjects spent extra time examining objects, though more objects were missed altogether. In Experiment 2, low-vision subjects spent more time looking toward the boundary between the floor and the wall, but gaze patterns were otherwise similar to acuity-restricted subjects with normal vision. Low-vision subjects were also more likely to miss objects compared to acuity-restricted subjects. We conclude that under conditions of artificially restricted acuity, normally sighted subjects look downward toward the floor more frequently while navigating and take extra time to examine objects of interest, but are less likely to detect them. Low-vision subjects tend to direct their gaze toward the boundary between the wall and the floor, which may serve as a high contrast cue for navigation.

Orientation-selective contrast adaptation measured with SSVEP.

Exposure to oriented luminance contrast patterns causes a reduction in visual sensitivity specifically for the adapter orientation. This orientation selectivity is probably the most studied aspect of contrast adaptation, but it has rarely been measured with steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs), despite their becoming one of the more popular methods of human neuroscience. Here, we measured orientation selective adaptation by presenting a plaid stimulus of which the horizontal and vertical grating reversed contrast at different temporal frequencies, while recording EEG signals from occipital visual areas. In three experiments, we compared SSVEP responses to the plaid before and after adaptation. All experiments showed a significant decrease in SSVEP response at the frequency of the adapter orientation, whereas such an effect was absent for the frequency of the orthogonal orientation. Adaptation also led to robust phase delays, selectively for the SSVEP frequency corresponding to the adapter orientation. These results demonstrate the efficiency of SSVEPs for measuring orientation selective adaptation; the method can measure changes in both amplitude and phase, simultaneously for two orientations.

Indoor Spatial Updating With Impaired Vision.

Purpose: Spatial updating is the ability to keep track of position and orientation while moving through an environment. We asked how normally sighted and visually impaired subjects compare in spatial updating and in estimating room dimensions. Methods: Groups of 32 normally sighted, 16 low-vision, and 16 blind subjects estimated the dimensions of six rectangular rooms. Updating was assessed by guiding the subjects along three-segment paths in the rooms. At the end of each path, they estimated the distance and direction to the starting location, and to a designated target. Spatial updating was tested in five conditions ranging from free viewing to full auditory and visual deprivation. Results: The normally sighted and low-vision groups did not differ in their accuracy for judging room dimensions. Correlations between estimated size and physical size were high. Accuracy of low-vision performance was not correlated with acuity, contrast sensitivity, or field status. Accuracy was lower for the blind subjects. The three groups were very similar in spatial-updating performance, and exhibited only weak dependence on the nature of the viewing conditions. Conclusions: People with a wide range of low-vision conditions are able to judge room dimensions as accurately as people with normal vision. Blind subjects have difficulty in judging the dimensions of quiet rooms, but some information is available from echolocation. Vision status has little impact on performance in simple spatial updating; proprioceptive and vestibular cues are sufficient.

Indoor Spatial Updating with Reduced Visual Information.

PURPOSE: Spatial updating refers to the ability to keep track of position and orientation while moving through an environment. People with impaired vision may be less accurate in spatial updating with adverse consequences for indoor navigation. In this study, we asked how artificial restrictions on visual acuity and field size affect spatial updating, and also judgments of the size of rooms. METHODS: Normally sighted young adults were tested with artificial restriction of acuity in Mild Blur (Snellen 20/135) and Severe Blur (Snellen 20/900) conditions, and a Narrow Field (8°) condition. The subjects estimated the dimensions of seven rectangular rooms with and without these visual restrictions. They were also guided along three-segment paths in the rooms. At the end of each path, they were asked to estimate the distance and direction to the starting location. In Experiment 1, the subjects walked along the path. In Experiment 2, they were pushed in a wheelchair to determine if reduced proprioceptive input would result in poorer spatial updating. RESULTS: With unrestricted vision, mean Weber fractions for room-size estimates were near 20%. Severe Blur but not Mild Blur yielded larger errors in room-size judgments. The Narrow Field was associated with increased error, but less than with Severe Blur. There was no effect of visual restriction on estimates of distance back to the starting location, and only Severe Blur yielded larger errors in the direction estimates. Contrary to expectation, the wheelchair subjects did not exhibit poorer updating performance than the walking subjects, nor did they show greater dependence on visual condition. DISCUSSION: If our results generalize to people with low vision, severe deficits in acuity or field will adversely affect the ability to judge the size of indoor spaces, but updating of position and orientation may be less affected by visual impairment.

Equalization and decorrelation in primary visual cortex.

There are many theories on the purpose of neural adaptation, but evidence remains elusive. Here, we discuss the recent work by Benucci et al. (Nat Neurosci 16: 724-729, 2013), who measured for the first time the immediate effects of adaptation on the overall activity of a neuronal population. These measurements confirm two long-standing hypotheses about the purpose of adaptation, namely that adaptation counteracts biases in the statistics of the environment, and that it maintains decorrelation in neuronal stimulus selectivity.

Extracting the mean size across the visual field in patients with mild, chronic unilateral neglect.

Previous studies suggest that normal vision pools information from groups of objects in a display to extract statistical summaries (e.g., mean size). Here we explored whether patients with mild, chronic left neglect were able to extract statistical summaries on the right and left sides of space in a typical manner. We tested four patients using a visual search task and varied the mean size of a group of circles within the display. On each trial, a single circle first appeared in the center of the screen (the target). This circle varied in size from trial to trial. Then a multi-item display appeared with circles of various sizes grouped together either on the left or right side of the display. The instructions were to search the circles and determine whether the target was present or not. The circles were always accompanied by a group of task-irrelevant triangles that appeared on the opposite side of the display. On half the trials, the mean size of the circles was the size of the target. On the other half the mean size was different from the target. The patients were not told that this was the case, and no explicit report of the statistics was required. The results showed that when the targets were absent patients produced more false alarms to the mean than non-mean size when the circles were on the left (neglected) side of the display. This finding demonstrates that statistical information was implicitly extracted from the left group of circles. However, summary statistics on the right side were not limited to the circles. Rather it appears that participants pooled the distractors with the target circles, yielding a skewed statistical summary on the right side. These findings are discussed as they relate to statistical summary processing, visual search and segregation of right and left items in patients with mild, chronic unilateral neglect.

Characteristics of the filled-in surface at the blind spot.

Our visual system can restore information missing within the portion of the retinal image corresponding to the blind spot where the optic nerve exits the eye. Previous studies of the properties of filled-in surfaces at the blind spot have found similarities and dissimilarities between filled-in and real surfaces and have therefore not provided a consistent view of the characteristics of the filled-in surface. First, we investigated whether filling-in utilizes a contour integration mechanism. Gratings with collinear lines filled in the blind spot more effectively than those both with orthogonal lines and without any line, suggesting that collinear facilitation underlies the filling-in of the blind spot. Second, the dynamics of binocular rivalry was examined by comparing the dominance duration distributions of filled-in and real surfaces. The results indicated that the strength of the filled-in surface was attenuated compared to that of the real surface during rivalry. Lastly, we tested whether travelling waves of dominance in rivalry could occur at the blind spot. The travelling waves could propagate through a hole only at the blind spot, suggesting that the filled-in surface helps perceptual waves to travel across the blind spot. These results suggest that the filled-in surface shares a common mechanism via a horizontal connection but that it has weak strength to suppress the opposite eye during binocular viewing.