Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
1.
Eur Respir J ; 44(2): 304-23, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24925919

RESUMO

The objective of Integrated Care Pathways for Airway Diseases (AIRWAYS-ICPs) is to launch a collaboration to develop multi-sectoral care pathways for chronic respiratory diseases in European countries and regions. AIRWAYS-ICPs has strategic relevance to the European Union Health Strategy and will add value to existing public health knowledge by: 1) proposing a common framework of care pathways for chronic respiratory diseases, which will facilitate comparability and trans-national initiatives; 2) informing cost-effective policy development, strengthening in particular those on smoking and environmental exposure; 3) aiding risk stratification in chronic disease patients, using a common strategy; 4) having a significant impact on the health of citizens in the short term (reduction of morbidity, improvement of education in children and of work in adults) and in the long-term (healthy ageing); 5) proposing a common simulation tool to assist physicians; and 6) ultimately reducing the healthcare burden (emergency visits, avoidable hospitalisations, disability and costs) while improving quality of life. In the longer term, the incidence of disease may be reduced by innovative prevention strategies. AIRWAYSICPs was initiated by Area 5 of the Action Plan B3 of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. All stakeholders are involved (health and social care, patients, and policy makers).


Assuntos
Transtornos Respiratórios/terapia , Envelhecimento , Asma/terapia , Tomada de Decisões , Europa (Continente) , União Europeia , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Organização Mundial da Saúde
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 130(5): 1049-62, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23040884

RESUMO

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma represent global health problems for all age groups. Asthma and rhinitis frequently coexist in the same subjects. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) was initiated during a World Health Organization workshop in 1999 (published in 2001). ARIA has reclassified AR as mild/moderate-severe and intermittent/persistent. This classification closely reflects patients' needs and underlines the close relationship between rhinitis and asthma. Patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals are confronted with various treatment choices for the management of AR. This contributes to considerable variation in clinical practice, and worldwide, patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals are faced with uncertainty about the relative merits and downsides of the various treatment options. In its 2010 Revision, ARIA developed clinical practice guidelines for the management of AR and asthma comorbidities based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. ARIA is disseminated and implemented in more than 50 countries of the world. Ten years after the publication of the ARIA World Health Organization workshop report, it is important to make a summary of its achievements and identify the still unmet clinical, research, and implementation needs to strengthen the 2011 European Union Priority on allergy and asthma in children.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Animais , Asma/classificação , Asma/complicações , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Rinite Alérgica Perene/classificação , Rinite Alérgica Perene/complicações , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/classificação , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/complicações , Organização Mundial da Saúde
4.
Tuberk Toraks ; 60(1): 92-7, 2012.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22554377

RESUMO

Allergic rhinitis and asthma represent global health problems for all age groups. Asthma and rhinitis frequently co-exist in the same subjects. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) was initiated during a World Health Organization (WHO) workshop in 1999 and was published in 2001. ARIA has reclassified allergic rhinitis as mild/moderate-severe and intermittent/persistent. This classification schema closely reflects the impact of allergic rhinitis on patients. In its 2010 Revision, ARIA developed clinical practice guidelines for the management of allergic rhinitis and asthma co-morbidities based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). ARIA has been disseminated and implemented in over 50 countries of the world. In Turkey, it is important to make a record of ARIA achievements and to identify the still unmet clinical, research and implementation needs in order to strengthen the 2011 EU Priority on allergy and asthma in children.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Asma/classificação , Comorbidade , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/classificação , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
5.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 158(3): 216-31, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22382913

RESUMO

Concepts of disease severity, activity, control and responsiveness to treatment are linked but different. Severity refers to the loss of function of the organs induced by the disease process or to the occurrence of severe acute exacerbations. Severity may vary over time and needs regular follow-up. Control is the degree to which therapy goals are currently met. These concepts have evolved over time for asthma in guidelines, task forces or consensus meetings. The aim of this paper is to generalize the approach of the uniform definition of severe asthma presented to WHO for chronic allergic and associated diseases (rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis) in order to have a uniform definition of severity, control and risk, usable in most situations. It is based on the appropriate diagnosis, availability and accessibility of treatments, treatment responsiveness and associated factors such as comorbidities and risk factors. This uniform definition will allow a better definition of the phenotypes of severe allergic (and related) diseases for clinical practice, research (including epidemiology), public health purposes, education and the discovery of novel therapies.


Assuntos
Asma/fisiopatologia , Hipersensibilidade/complicações , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Asma/terapia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/epidemiologia , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Urticária/complicações , Urticária/epidemiologia
6.
Allergy ; 67(1): 18-24, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22050279

RESUMO

This pocket guide is the result of a consensus reached between members of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2) LEN) and Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA). The aim of the current pocket guide is to offer a comprehensive set of recommendations on the use of skin prick tests in allergic rhinitis-conjunctivitis and asthma in daily practice. This pocket guide is meant to give simple answers to the most frequent questions raised by practitioners in Europe, including 'practicing allergists', general practitioners and any other physicians with special interest in the management of allergic diseases. It is not a long or detailed scientific review of the topic. However, the recommendations in this pocket guide were compiled following an in-depth review of existing guidelines and publications, including the 1993 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology position paper, the 2001 ARIA document and the ARIA update 2008 (prepared in collaboration with GA(2) LEN). The recommendations cover skin test methodology and interpretation, allergen extracts to be used, as well as indications in a variety of settings including paediatrics and developing countries.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Testes Cutâneos/normas , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/imunologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia
7.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 156(1): 1-15, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21969990

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Evidence-based medicine represents the effort to highlight the best intervention for patients, clinicians, and policy makers, each from their respective viewpoint, to solve a particular health condition. According to a recently diffused grading system of evidence and recommendations for medical interventions, efficacy and safety represent 2 of the most important features to consider, and data from meta-analyses of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) is the strongest supporting demonstration. Fexofenadine has been used for its efficacy and safety in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) for many years although no meta-analyses supporting its use currently exist. The aim of this study is to assess for the first time the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine in the treatment of AR by means of a meta-analytic analysis of existing RCTs. Since specific evidence should be provided to address recommendations in a pediatric population, the quality of the estimates of this subgroup analysis is assessed. METHODS: All double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials assessing the efficacy of fexofenadine in AR were searched for in OVID, Medline, and Embase databases up to December 2007. Outcomes were extracted from original articles; when this information was not available, the authors of each trial were contacted. Some graphics were digitalized. The RevMan 5 program was used to perform the analysis. GradePro 3.2.2 was used to assess the quality of the evidence for a pediatric population. RESULTS: Of 2,152 identified articles, 20 were potentially relevant trials. Eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The main reasons for exclusion were: unnatural exposure, strong study limitations, an atypical outcome measurement, a design for other outcomes, and not being a placebo-controlled, single-blind study. Seven trials investigated a mixed population of adults and children, 1 trial investigated only children, and 1 trial only adults. In 1,833 patients receiving fexofenadine (1,699 placebo), a significant reduction of the daily reflective total symptom scores (TSS) (SMD ­0.42; 95% CI ­0.49 to ­0.35, p < 0.00001) was found. Positive results were also found for morning instantaneous TSS and individual nasal symptom scores (sneezing, rhinorrhea, itching, and congestion). The safety analysis did not show a significant difference in reported adverse events (AE) between the active and placebo treatment groups (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.87­1.22, p = 0.75). A very low heterogeneity between the studies was detected, so a fixed-effects model was used. The mean quality level of the included trials was medium. Specific information for a pediatric population may be assumed with a moderate quality of evidence from only 1 study and with a low quality of evidence, mainly due to indirectness, from the others. CONCLUSIONS: This study has 5 major strengths: it represents the first attempt to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine in the treatment of AR by means of a meta-analysis of RCTs; there was consistency between positive results in terms of efficacy in TSS and in individual symptoms; a large population was studied; there was an irrelevant interstudy heterogeneity, and the AE frequency was similar in both groups. All of these values encourage the recommendation of fexofenadine for AR. Further research focused on the benefits and disadvantages for a pediatric population is needed.


Assuntos
Antagonistas não Sedativos dos Receptores H1 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Terfenadina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Antagonistas não Sedativos dos Receptores H1 da Histamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Terfenadina/efeitos adversos , Terfenadina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Allergy ; 66(6): 765-74, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21496059

RESUMO

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is one of the treatments for allergic rhinitis. However, for allergists, nonspecialists, regulators, payers, and patients, there remain gaps in understanding the evaluation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although treating the same diseases, RCTs in SIT and pharmacotherapy should be considered separately for several reasons, as developed in this study. These include the severity and persistence of allergic rhinitis in the patients enrolled in the study, the problem of the placebo, allergen exposure (in particular pollen and mite), the analysis and reporting of the study, the level of symptoms of placebo-treated patients, the clinical relevance of the efficacy of SIT, the need for a validated combined symptom-medication score, the differences between children and adults and pharmacoeconomic analyses. This statement reviews issues raised by the interpretation of RCTs in sublingual immunotherapy. It is not possible to directly extrapolate the rules or parameters used in medication RCTs to SIT. It also provides some suggestions for the research that will be needed. Interestingly, some of the research questions can be approached with the available data obtained from large RCTs.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Administração Sublingual , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Ácaros/imunologia , Pólen/imunologia , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite Alérgica Perene/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Perene/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/fisiopatologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 42(4): 146-54, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21114198

RESUMO

Guidelines recognize the importance of achieving and maintaining asthma control: the treatment strategies nw available allow the control of the great majority of patients with asthma but despite many efforts only 5% of patients achieve guideline-defined asthma control. The GAPP (The Global Asthma Physician and Patient survey) is a global quantitative survey with the aiim of identifying barriers to optimal management of asthma. Physicians and adult patients with persistent asthma have been interviewed with closed-ended questions questionnaire. This study has been conducted in 16 countries. In Italy the survey has revealed that physicians prescribe a combination of ICS and LABA more often in the other countries. They consider ICS the first-line treatment for mild persistent asthma. They are not completely satified with ICS because of local and systemic side effects. At the same time, the reason why patients change asthma medication is the potential for side effects. The two group responses were found to differ about the time spent discussing how to improve the management of asthma. A better communication between physician and patient and a new treatment option with lower side effect profile could be the key point to achieve asthma control in a larger number of patients.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Pacientes , Relações Médico-Paciente , Médicos , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Asma/fisiopatologia , Asma/psicologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Europa (Continente) , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Adesão à Medicação , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20945603

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The pathogeny of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRS/NP) has not been elucidated. Bacterial exotoxins have been implicated in many inflammatory chronic diseases, such as chronic otitis, chronic tonsillitis, cholesteatomas, and more recently CRS/NP. We propose that the bacteria in CRS/NP are not only present in a planktonic state, but also occur in microbial communities as biofilms. OBJECTIVE: To determine and characterize the presence of biofilms in CRS/NP. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 12 patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyposis. Ten patients without CRS/NP who underwent septoplasty were included as a control group. Tissue samples were obtained from the inferior turbinate mucosae. The bacteria were isolated and typified and the material was examined in vitro using a spectrophotometer, and in vivo using optical microscopy and confocal scanning laser microscopy. RESULTS: Moderate to high in vitro biofilm-forming capacity was detected in 9 out of 12 patients with CRS/NP (mean [SD] optical density values of between 0.284 [0.017] and 3.337 [0.029]). The microorganisms isolated were Staphylococcus (5 patients), Streptococcus viridans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus viridans/Corynebacterium. Biofilms were demonstrated in vivo in 2 patients and no biofilm structures were evident in any of the controls. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the presence of bacterial biofilms in patients with CRS/NP. This chronic inflammatory factor might contribute to nasal mucosa damage, increased inflammatory cells in tissue, and the subsequent hyperplasic process.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Pólipos Nasais/microbiologia , Rinite/microbiologia , Sinusite/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bactérias/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Bactérias/patogenicidade , Infecções Bacterianas/patologia , Infecções Bacterianas/fisiopatologia , Infecções Bacterianas/cirurgia , Biofilmes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pólipos Nasais/imunologia , Pólipos Nasais/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Rinite/patologia , Rinite/fisiopatologia , Rinite/cirurgia , Sinusite/patologia , Sinusite/fisiopatologia , Sinusite/cirurgia
11.
Allergy ; 65(10): 1212-21, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20887423

RESUMO

The links between asthma and rhinitis are well characterized. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines stress the importance of these links and provide guidance for their prevention and treatment. Despite effective treatments being available, too few patients receive appropriate medical care for both diseases. Most patients with rhinitis and asthma consult primary care physicians and therefore these physicians are encouraged to understand and use ARIA guidelines. Patients should also be informed about these guidelines to raise their awareness of optimal care and increase control of the two related diseases. To apply these guidelines, clinicians and patients need to understand how and why the recommendations were made. The goal of the ARIA guidelines is to provide recommendations about the best management options for most patients in most situations. These recommendations should be based on the best available evidence. Making recommendations requires the assessment of the quality of available evidence, deciding on the balance between benefits and downsides, consideration of patients' values and preferences, and, if applicable, resource implications. Guidelines must be updated as new management options become available or important new evidence emerges. Transparent reporting of guidelines facilitates understanding and acceptance, but implementation strategies need to be improved.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Asma/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Técnicas de Planejamento , Rinite Alérgica Perene/prevenção & controle , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/prevenção & controle , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia
12.
Eur Respir J ; 36(5): 995-1001, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20223919

RESUMO

The 2008-2013 World Health Organization (WHO) action plan on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) includes chronic respiratory diseases as one of its four priorities. Major chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) include asthma and rhinitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, occupational lung diseases, sleep-disordered breathing, pulmonary hypertension, bronchiectiasis and pulmonary interstitial diseases. A billion people suffer from chronic respiratory diseases, the majority being in developing countries. CRDs have major adverse effects on the life and disability of patients. Effective intervention plans can prevent and control CRDs, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. A prioritised research agenda should encapsulate all of these considerations in the frame of the global fight against NCDs. This requires both CRD-targeted interventions and transverse NCD programmes which include CRDs, with emphasis on health promotion and disease prevention.


Assuntos
Saúde Global , Pneumopatias/prevenção & controle , Pneumopatias/terapia , Pesquisa/tendências , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Humanos , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Prevalência
13.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 13(8): 1023-8, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19723384

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The association of tobacco smoke with the prevalence of asthma and rhinitis has not been well-characterized in adolescents. METHODS: As part of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC), we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 3000 adolescents aged 13-14 years in northern Argentina. Data included questions about asthma and rhinitis symptoms and about parental and personal smoking. Logistic regression and Pearson chi(2) statistics were used to estimate these associations. RESULTS: Over 13% of respondents described themselves as current smokers, and half indicated that at least one parent smoked at home. Active smoking was associated with both asthma (OR 1.83, 95%CI 1.42-2.35) and rhinitis (OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.33-1.92) in unadjusted analysis. These associations persisted after adjusting for parental smoking status, mother's educational level and sex. Boys were significantly less likely than girls to report current asthma or rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: Active and passive smoking are both risk factors for asthma and rhinitis in adolescents. Assuming that some children with asthma never started smoking due to symptoms, then the true risk could be higher than reported here. These results reinforce the need to develop better strategies for primary and secondary prevention of tobacco exposure in children.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Rinite/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Argentina/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Prevalência , Prevenção Primária , Fatores de Risco , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Allergy ; 63(10): 1280-91, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18721246

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) thus allowing for a meta-analysis to determine the overall treatment effect. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library databases up to 31 October, 2007 was carried out. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of MFNS in patients with AR compared to placebo were included. Total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), individual nasal symptoms, total non-nasal symptom scores (TNNSS) and nasal airflow were analysed as the standardized mean difference (SMD). Meta-analysis was performed with the random or the fixed effect models depending on heterogeneity, by using revman 5 software. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixteen of the 113 identified articles met the inclusion criteria. For MFNS efficacy on TNSS, 2998 participants were analysed: 1534 received MFNS and 1464 placebo. Mometasone furoate nasal spray was associated with a significant reduction in TNSS (SMD -0.49, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.38; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 50.1%). A significant effect on SMD for nasal stuffiness/congestion (-0.41; 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.27), rhinorrhoea (-0.44; 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.21), sneezing (-0.40; 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.23) and nasal itching (-0.39; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.25) was also demonstrated. Mometasone furoate nasal spray treated subjects also showed a significant reduction in TNNSS (-0.30; 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18). The proportion of patients with adverse events was similar for MFNS and placebo (0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.20; P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides a level Ia evidence for the efficacy of MFSN in the treatment of AR vs placebo. Adverse events frequency was similar in both groups.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Pregnadienodiois/administração & dosagem , Pregnadienodiois/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Rinite Alérgica Perene/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Antialérgicos/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Furoato de Mometasona , Placebos , Pregnadienodiois/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos
16.
Allergy ; 63(1): 38-46, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18053015

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We describe the methodology for the 2008 update of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines. The methodology differs from the 2001 edition in several respects. The most prominent change is the application of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to compiling evidence, assessing the quality of evidence and grading of recommendations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Representatives of the GRADE working group joined the ARIA guideline panel to achieve these tasks. While most recommendations result from existing systematic reviews, systematic reviews were not always available and the panel compiled the best available evidence in evidence profiles without conducting actual reviews. The panel conducted two meetings and used the GRADE criteria to assess the quality of evidence (four categories of high, moderate, low and very low) and the strength of recommendation (strong and weak) based on weighing up the desirable and undesirable effects of management strategies, considering values and preferences influencing recommendations, and resource implications. The guideline panel has chosen the words 'we recommend'--for strong recommendations and 'we suggest'--for weak recommendations. Both categories indicate the best course of action for a given patient population, but their implementation, requires different considerations as we describe subsequently in this article. CONCLUSIONS: The 2008 update of the ARIA guidelines has become more evidence-based. Future iterations of the guidelines will further be improved by following the described processes even closer, such as ensuring availability of updated high quality systematic reviews for each question.


Assuntos
Asma/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Rinite Alérgica Perene/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Asma/terapia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
17.
Allergy ; 62(6): 668-74, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17508972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Global Asthma Physician and Patient (GAPP) Survey is the first global quantitative survey designed to uncover asthma attitudes and treatment practices among separate groups of physicians and patients, with the goal of identifying barriers to optimal management. METHOD: A total of 5582 physician and patient interviews were conducted globally online, by telephone and face-to-face. This paper highlights key global findings from the adult arm (3559 interviews) conducted in 16 countries. RESULTS: Physician and patient responses were found to differ when respondents were asked the same set of questions. Perceptions of time spent on asthma education, the quality of physician-patient communications, awareness and experience of side effects and understanding and knowledge of treatment noncompliance were found to differ between these two sets of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The GAPP Survey not only defines an unmet need in asthma treatment, but also reveals that there is a direct relationship between the quality of physician-patient communication, the level of treatment side effects and the extent of patient compliance. These survey findings highlight a clear need for improved patient-focused care in asthma.


Assuntos
Asma , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/psicologia , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Assistência ao Paciente , Cooperação do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica
18.
Allergy ; 62(3): 317-24, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17298350

RESUMO

Specific Immunotherapy for respiratory allergy is used since about one century and there is now solid documentation of its efficacy. Nevertheless, the methods and experimental designs used in clinical trials are quite heterogeneous and there is no unanimously accepted methodological standard. Many studies are planned with study designs that may not confirm the clinical value of SIT as an effective treatment to reduce disease severity. To ensure that patients are treated based on sound scientific evidence and to minimize the risk of misusing limited financial resources for scientific studies, the World Allergy Organization (WAO) convened a group of experts to provide guidelines for the methodology of future immunotherapy studies. This document summarizes the recommendations for study design, patients' selection, appropriate outcomes and statistical treatment to be used in planning and performing clinical trials with specific immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Dessensibilização Imunológica/normas , Diretrizes para o Planejamento em Saúde , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/terapia , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes , Projetos de Pesquisa , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Allergy ; 61(9): 1086-96, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16918512

RESUMO

The pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis proposed by ARIA is an evidence-based and step-wise approach based on the classification of the symptoms. The ARIA workshop, held in December 1999, published a report in 2001 and new information has subsequently been published. The initial ARIA document lacked some important information on several issues. This document updates the ARIA sections on the pharmacologic and anti-IgE treatments of allergic rhinitis. Literature published between January 2000 and December 2004 has been included. Only a few studies assessing nasal and non-nasal symptoms are presented as these will be discussed in a separate document.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Idiotípicos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Animais , Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Antialérgicos/efeitos adversos , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Anti-Idiotípicos/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Anti-Idiotípicos/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Rinite Alérgica Perene/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico
20.
Allergy ; 59(11): 1219-23, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15461605

RESUMO

Chemokines are a superfamily of small cytokines with activities ranging from leukocyte traffick to hematopoiesis, angiogenesis, and tissue organogenesis. Secondary lymphoid-organ chemokine (SLC/CCL21) was originally reported as a chemokine constitutively expressed by stromal cells and high endothelial venules in secondary lymphoid tissues and endothelium of afferent lymphatics, directing CCR7+ cells. More recently, others and we have demonstrated that SLC/CCL21 is up-regulated in different skin inflammatory conditions. Thereafter, this molecule is much more than a constitutive chemokine, which could play a role in effector and regulatory immune functions.


Assuntos
Quimiocinas CC/imunologia , Tecido Linfoide/imunologia , Quimiocina CCL21 , Quimiocinas , Quimiotaxia de Leucócito , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...