Negative outcomes associated with medication in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who present at the emergency department.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Medication is the main treatment option for patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. However, medication can have negative effects. We aimed to detect negative outcomes associated with medication that led to patients with chronic atrial fibrillation presenting themselves to hospital emergency departments. We assessed the severity of those outcomes and comment on whether they could have been avoided. METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included all patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who attended the emergency department of our tertiary hospital. We used the Dader method to identify and evaluate the negative outcomes associated with medication through interviews with patients and scrutiny of the clinical charts. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 198 eligible patients who presented at the emergency department, 134 (67·7%) did so because of negative outcomes associated with medication (41% related to necessity, 32·1% to effectiveness and 26·9% to safety); 67·9% of those negative outcomes could have been avoided. In terms of severity, 6·7% were mild, 31·3% moderate, 51·5% severe and 10·4% fatal. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification anatomical group most frequently associated with negative outcomes was the cardiovascular system, followed by blood/blood-forming organs. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: A high percentage of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation presenting at hospital emergency departments had negative outcomes associated with medication. Some led to deaths. More than half of these were severe, and most could have been avoided.

Conciliación de los medicamentos en los servicios de urgencias / Medication reconciliation in emergency departments

Los errores de medicación (EM) son comunes en el ámbito hospitalario y conducen aun incremento de la morbilidad y mortalidad y de los costes económicos. Estos errores ocurren sobre todo durante la transición de pacientes entre los diferentes niveles asistenciales. La posibilidad de que se produzcan estos errores se ve aumentada en los servicios de urgencias (SU) por la naturaleza de éstos. Desde instituciones sanitarias a nivel mundial, se reconoce la conciliación de la medicación (CM) como la solución a esta problemática. Se define como el proceso que consiste en obtener un listado completo y exacto de la medicación previa del paciente y compararlo con la prescripción médica después de la transición asistencial. Si se encuentran discrepancias deben considerarse y, si es necesario, modificar la prescripción médica para finalmente comunicar al siguiente responsable en salud del paciente y al propio paciente, la nueva lista conciliada. Este documento de consenso ofrece una serie de recomendaciones generales para la conciliación de los medicamentos. Incluye para cada subgrupo una serie de recomendaciones específicas de tipo farmacológico, que permiten un abordaje personalizado del tratamiento del paciente que acude a urgencias en base a las características clínicas individuales. Existirán casos en los que se desestime las recomendaciones aquí descritas, ya que la relación riesgo/beneficio requerirá una valoración individualizada. Esta valoración individualizada para el paciente se llevará a cabo por el equipo multidisciplinar responsable de su asistencia sanitaria (AU)

Medication errors, which are common in hospitals, lead to higher morbidity, mortality, and expenditure. Errors are most common when patients are transferred from one level of care to another, and the likelihood of mistakes is higher in emergency departments because of the intrinsic nature of emergency care. The internationally recognized remedy for this situation is medication reconciliation, defined as the process of obtaining a complete, accurate list of the patient's prior medications and comparing it to the list of medicines prescribed after admission to a new level of care. Discrepancies should be considered and prescriptions changed if necessary. Both the person who will be responsible for the next phase of care and the patient should be informed of the new list of medications. This consensus statement offers a set of general recommendations for medication reconciliation. Specific recommendations for each subgroup of medications are also included to allow emergency department prescribing to be tailored to individual patient characteristics. The recommendations in this statement should be overridden in some cases if the risk-benefit ratio suggests that further individualization is required. Individualized assessment of medications should be carried out by a multidisciplinary team responsible for the patient’s care (AU)

[Opinion of the primary care veterinarians of Andalusia concerning the management of their professional practice]. / Opinión de los veterinarios de atención primaria de Andalucía sobre la gestión de su ejercicio profesional.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the opinion of the veterinarians in Andalusia regarding the organization and management of their professional practice and pinpoints solutions to the problems found for the purpose of providing planning and management aspects in view of the reforms undertaken in the Andalusian Health Service Strategy Plan. METHOD: Descriptive opinion poll employing a questionnaire filled out by each individual among all of the Primary Care (PC) veterinarians in Andalusia (including those who have been currently employed who possess at least one year's experience, except substitutes). A description was provided of their personal traits, their opinion of the management-related factors involved in their professional practice. A description was also provided of the suggestions for improving the problems found to exist. RESULTS: Over 70% said they were aware of the objectives, although only the coordinators found them to be clearly motivating the practice. Their opinion was that the indicators of activity neither include any quality-related criteria nor afford the possibility of evaluating the activity they are carrying out. They believed that the contributions from other members of the multidisciplinary team improve their work and are in favor of continuing their involvement therein. They were satisfied with doing their work (the coordinators to a greater degree). They found the productivity pay to be too low and not useful as regards providing them with any incentive. They were not satisfied with the training with which they are provided and thought that what they are offered is far less than their other colleagues in the health care field. Most were of the opinion that they should remain under the authority of the Andalusian Health Service. CONCLUSIONS: This group prefers to continue working for the same organization, but improving the following management aspects: training offer, practice incentives and activity indicators.