Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthop Nurs ; 40(4): 240-245, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397979

RESUMO

Hearing protection devices reduce cast-saw noise. It would be helpful to identify the devices that are both effective and economical. Prior studies have shown that expensive noise-reduction headphones significantly reduced the anxiety associated with cast removal with a powered oscillating saw. The cost of such headphones, however, is a drawback for some practices and hospitals. It would be helpful to determine whether lower cost ear protection can provide effective cast-saw noise reduction. In addition, it is unclear whether the noise reduction ratings (NRRs), the average sound-level reduction provided by a hearing protection device in a laboratory test, provided by manufacturers accurately characterize the effectiveness for reducing cast-saw noise. Note that noise-cancelling devices do not carry an NRR because they are not designed as hearing protectors. Five ear protection devices with different NNRs were tested. The devices varied greatly in cost and included earplugs, low-cost earmuffs, and noise-cancelling headphones. To standardize the evaluation, each device was fitted to an acoustic mannequin with high-fidelity ear microphones while a fiberglass spica cast was cut. An additional test was run without hearing protection as a control. The low-cost devices significantly reduced the saw noise, with the exception of earplugs, which had highly variable performance. The noise reduction was similar between low-cost earmuffs and the high-cost earphones when the noise-cancelling feature was not active. Active noise cancelling provided further reductions in the noise level. Patients can experience high anxiety during cast removal. The current study shows that low-cost earmuffs significantly reduce cast-saw noise. Patient care settings may be more likely to offer hearing protection that is one twenty-fifth the cost of noise-cancelling headphones. An NRR appears to be a reliable guide for selecting hearing protection that reduces cast-saw noise.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas/economia , Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas/normas , Ruído/prevenção & controle , Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Madeira
2.
Orthopedics ; 44(4): 208-214, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292817

RESUMO

Surgical suits provide protection to orthopedic surgeons, but the suits and fan noise may interfere with communication between operative team members. The goal of this study was to quantify the fan sound and effect of the suit, fan, and N95 mask. Sound levels were measured using a specialized manikin and evaluated using preferred speech interference levels (PSILs), noise criterion (NC) ratings, and comparison with speech sound levels from the literature. Additionally, sound blocking due to the surgical suit was measured and combined effects of the fan and suit were described using a signal to noise ratio (SNR). The noise with the fan at medium and high speed was louder than average speech and the PSILs at these speeds were significantly higher than with the fan off. The fan NC rating of 50 to 60 exceeded the recommended range of 25 to 30 for operating rooms. The N95 mask, space suit, and distance between speaker and receiver all reduced the sound signal at the receiver's ear, with the worst case being full personal protective equipment on both and speaker distanced from receiver. The estimated SNR for the suit and fan system was negative for many frequency bands used in speech, indicating more noise than signal. Multiple measures indicated that the fan noises were at levels associated with speech interference. This noise combined with sound blocking provided by the suit produced SNRs commonly associated with noisy to very noisy environments. This study suggests the combined effects of the suit, fan, and distance may negatively impact operating room communication. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):208-214.].


Assuntos
Ortopedia , Inteligibilidade da Fala , Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça , Humanos , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual
3.
J Hand Surg Am ; 45(5): 457.e1-457.e5, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31320232

RESUMO

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytic rheumatologic disorder characterized by multiple skin lesions, painful hand nodules, and destructive polyarthritis that results in arthritis mutilans in 20% to 30% of patients. In the current literature, there have been approximately 300 cases reported and the pathogenesis remains unclear. Currently, there is no diagnostic serologic test and no consensus on management. In this case report, we present a patient with multicentric reticulohistiocytosis who was treated with selective excision of 3 painful nodules on the hand. The patient was seen 1 year after surgery. One of the nodules reoccurred whereas the other 2 remained quiescent. This procedure has the potential to produce considerable pain relief and improve quality of life in a disease process for which optimal medical regimen remains to be determined.


Assuntos
Artrite , Histiocitose de Células não Langerhans , Dermatopatias , Artrite/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Histiocitose de Células não Langerhans/diagnóstico , Histiocitose de Células não Langerhans/cirurgia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...