A Prospective Observational Study of Diagnostic Reliability of Semiquantitative and Quantitative High b-Value Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Distinguishing between Benign and Malignant Lung Lesions at 3 Tesla.

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate benign and malignant lung lesions in 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods Thirty-one patients with lung lesions underwent a high b-value (b= 1000 s/mm 2 ) DW MRI in 3 Tesla. Thirty lesions were biopsied, followed by histopathological analysis, and one was serially followed up for 2 years. Statistical analysis was done to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different DWI parameters in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the cutoff values of different parameters. Results The qualitative assessment of signal intensity on DWI based on a 5-point rank scale had a mean score of 2.71 ± 0.75 for benign and 3. 75 ± 0.60 for malignant lesions. With a cutoff of 3.5, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 75, 86, and 77.6%, respectively. The mean ADC min (minimum apparent diffusion coefficient) value of benign and malignant lesions was 1. 49 ± 0.38 × 10-3 mm 2 /s and 1.11 ± 0.20 ×10-3 mm 2 /s, respectively. ROC curve analysis showed a cutoff value of 1.03 × 10-3 mm 2 /s; the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 87.5, 71.4, and 83.3%, respectively. For lesion to spinal cord ratio and lesion to spinal cord ADC ratio with a cutoff value of 1.08 and 1.38, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3 and 87.5%, 71.4 and 71.4%, and 80.6 and 83.8%, respectively. The exponential ADC showed a low accuracy rate. Conclusion The semiquantitative and quantitative parameters of high b-value DW 3 Tesla MRI can differentiate benign from malignant lesions with high accuracy and make it a reliable nonionizing modality for characterizing lung lesions.

Validation of Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Spine Using the "Burcev Technique": A Cadaveric Study.

The present study attempted to validate the "Burcev freehand method" based on anatomical observations in Indian cadavers. The study was conducted on 32 cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) that were placed in four cadavers by the authors according to the "freehand technique," described by Burcev et al, without the aid of fluoroscopy and the trajectory verified by computed tomography scans. The screws were designated as satisfactory, permissible, or unacceptable. Descriptive variables were represented in number and percentages, continuous variables were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Of the 32 CPSs placed, 24 (75%) exhibited a satisfactory position, 1 (3%) exhibited a permissible position, and 7 (22%) exhibited an unacceptable position. Of the seven CPSs in the unacceptable group, four exhibited a lateral breach and three exhibited a medial breach, whereas the CPS in the permissible group exhibited a medial breach. The overall angle with contralateral lamina in the horizontal plane in terms of mean ± SD was 175.43 ± 2.82, 169.49, and 169.65 ± 6.46 degrees in the satisfactory, permissible, and unacceptable groups, respectively. In the sagittal plane, the screws exhibited an angle of 88.15 ± 3.56 degrees. No breach was observed superiorly or inferiorly. The "Burcev technique" is replicable with similar results in cadavers. Further studies must be conducted in a clinical setting to ensure its safety.