RESUMO
Background Fever is one of the most common pediatric conditions usually managed by parents and the cause of nearly all pediatrician visits. However, many parents find the management of childhood fever and febrile diseases challenging owing to a lack of understanding of the nature, effects, and therapies of fever management. Objectives This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of paracetamol and ibuprofen administration among caregivers of the pediatric age group. Design Observational cross-sectional survey. Setting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods Data were collected between April 2018 and April 2019 using a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire consisting of 40 questions. Sample Size Overall, 493 caregivers were interviewed. Results Paracetamol was reported as the most common antipyretic used by the caregivers (54%) to control fever. Ibuprofen was the least preferred drug (18.5%). The majority of the participants (51.7%) admitted administering antipyretics at a body temperature of 38-38.5°C. A total of 90.7% of the participants measured children's temperature using a thermometer before administering antipyretics. Dosage was determined according to each child's age (40.4%), weight (32%), or illness severity (27.6%). However, 36.7% and 51.5% of the participants were unsure of the correct dosage of paracetamol and ibuprofen, respectively. Regarding the maximum frequency of paracetamol use, only 3.7% of the participants answered correctly. Most parents (70.4%) believed that a paracetamol/ibuprofen prescription was not necessary. Overall, 97% of the sample demonstrated inadequate knowledge about antipyretic administration. Conclusions Most caregivers had inadequate knowledge regarding factors that influence paracetamol and ibuprofen dosage and frequency of administration. This low level of knowledge increases the risk of improper drug intake, which can result in serious side effects, thereby indicating the need for the development of educational route programs to provide parents with appropriate education and information on fever and fever management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The benefit of liver transplantation is not only to increase the patient's lifetime but also for persistent relief of pain and anxiety. Shortage of the organ is the main hindrance of transplantation around the world, leading authorities to pass a general law for the reasonable distribution of organs and come up with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) system which scores the severity of liver disease and risk of mortality in order to detect the mechanism of allocation. Objective: This study aims to assess medical students' perception of the liver transplant and allocation system. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among 402 medical students at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: The majority of the medical students (84.4%) believed that a successful liver transplant improves both lifetime and quality of life. Most of the students also saw that the minimum survival rate should be five years after transplantation and that the patient should recover to be at least ambulatory, even if restricted by strenuous physical activity. When asked whether urgency or prospect of success defined a successful transplant, most of the students who chose urgency were preclinical (50.7%), while the prospect of success was the dominant answer chosen by students in their clinical years of study (66.1%). CONCLUSION: The criteria determining the success of a liver transplant include a gain in both lifetime and quality of life. The majority of respondents wanted the capacity to benefit to be considered in the liver allocation system.
