A Curious Case of Autoimmunity, Pancytopenia, and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

HISTORY AND EXAMINATION: A 21-year-old female patient presented to us with severe low back pain for 4 months. On examination, patient was afebrile, with severe pallor, and tenderness in both sacroiliac (SI) joints. Patient was being admitted and evaluated, and during the course of evaluation, developed severe headache, which was severe in intensity and associated with nausea and projectile vomiting. Initial investigations: An X-ray of the bilateral SI joints revealed inflammation, and the antinuclear antibody (ANA) turned out to be 4+ with pancytopenia and raised lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), but the liver function tests were normal. Rest of the rheumatological profile was unremarkable. During the course of the evaluation, she developed a severe headache, which, on imaging, showed presence of cerebral edema with chronic subdural hematoma, and a concomitant coagulopathy workup revealed evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). DISCUSSION: Taking the whole picture into consideration, a malignant process in the body was suspected, and serum tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) were sent, all of which were raised. Validating the clinical clue was the bone marrow biopsy done for pancytopenia, which revealed malignant epithelial infiltration. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) thorax and whole abdomen were done to find out the primary, which showed a neoplastic mass at the gastroesophageal junction along with bony metastases in the vertebrae and left adrenal. Tissue from the primary lesion was taken for histopathological examination (HPE) through upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Although HPE revealed grade III poorly differentiated stomach adenocarcinoma, the patient had succumbed to the disease process by the time the diagnosis came to light. CONCLUSION: In short, this case perfectly illustrates how solid organ malignancies might be a mimicker of multisystem disorders, thereby delaying diagnosis and worsening the prognosis even further.

Results of a comparative, phase III, 12-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and amlodipine versus amlodipine monotherapy in Indian adults with stage II hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new fixed-dose combination (FDC) of telmisartan 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg (T+A) compared with amlodipine 5-mg monotherapy (A) in adult Indian patients with stage II hypertension. METHODS: This comparative, Phase III, 12-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in Indian patients aged 18 to 65 years with established stage II hypertension. Patients were treated with oral FDC of T+A or A QD before breakfast for 12 weeks; blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were measured in the sitting position. Primary efficacy end points were reduction in clinical systolic BP (SBP)/ diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to study end and number of responders (ie, patients who achieved target SBP/ DBP <130/<80 mm Hg) at end of study. Tolerability was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events, identified using physical examination, laboratory analysis, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were enrolled in the study; 203 patients (143 men, 60 women) completed the study while 7 were lost to follow-up (4 patients in the T+A group and 3 in the A group) and considered with-drawn. At study end, statistically significant percentage reductions from baseline within groups and between groups were observed in SBP (T+A [-27.4%]; A [-16.6%]) and DBP (T+A [-20.1%]; A [-13.3%]) (all, P < 0.05). Response rates were 87.3% (89/102) in the T+A group and 69.3% (70/101) in the A group (P < 0.05). The prevalences of adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups (T+A, 16.0% [17/106]; A, 15.4% [16/104]). Peripheral edema was reported in 8.5% patients (9/106) in the T+A group compared with 13.5% (14/104) in the A group, and cough was reported in 3.8% patients (4/106) in the T+A group and 1.0% (1/104) patients in the A group; these differences did not reach statistical significance. The incidences of headache, dizziness, and diarrhea were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among these Indian patients with stage II hypertension, the FDC of T+A was found to be significantly more effective, with regard to BP reductions, than A, and both treatments were well tolerated.