COVID-19 in Brazil: spatial risk, social vulnerability, human development, clinical manifestations and predictors of mortality - a retrospective study with data from 59 695 individuals.

Brazil ranks second in the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide. In spite of this, coping measures differ throughout the national territory, as does the disease's impact on the population. This cross-sectional observational study, with 59 695 cases of COVID-19 registered in the state of Alagoas between March and August 2020, analysed clinical-epidemiological variables, incidence rate, mortality rate, case fatality rate (CFR) and the social indicators municipal human development index (MHDI) and social vulnerability index (SVI). Moran statistics and regression models were applied. Logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the predictors of death. The incidence rate was 1788.7/100 000 inhabitants; mortality rate was 48.0/100 000 and CFR was 2.7%. The highest incidence rates were observed in municipalities with better human development (overall MHDI (I = 0.1668; p = 0.002), education MHDI (I = 0.1649; p = 0.002) and income MHDI (I = 0.1880; p = 0.005)) and higher social vulnerability (overall SVI (I = 0.0599; p = 0.033)). CFR was associated with higher social vulnerability (SVI human capital (I = 0.0858; p = 0.004) and SVI urban infrastructure (I = 0.0985; p = 0.040)). Of the analysed cases, 55.4% were female; 2/3 were Black or Brown and the median age was 41 years. Among deaths, most were male (919; 57.4%) and elderly (1171; 73.1%). The predictors of death were male sex, advanced age and the presence of comorbidities. In Alagoas, Brazil, the disease has undergone a process of interiorisation and caused more deaths in poorer municipalities. The presence of comorbidities and advanced age were predictors of death.

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale (GABS) for a Brazilian population of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and to compare it to the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). METHODS: One hundred and seven PD patients were evaluated by shortened UPDRS motor scale (sUPDRSm), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Schwab and England scale (SE), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), BBS and GABS. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the GABS was 0.94, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.94 and 0.98 respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.6, to discriminate patients with a history of falls in the last twelve months, for a cut-off score of 13 points. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the Brazilian version of the GABS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess gait and balance in PD.

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale / Validacao da versao brasileira da escala de marcha e equilibrio e comparacao com a escala de equilibrio de Berg

Objective To validate the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale (GABS) for a Brazilian population of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and to compare it to the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Methods One hundred and seven PD patients were evaluated by shortened UPDRS motor scale (sUPDRSm), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Schwab and England scale (SE), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), BBS and GABS. Results The internal consistency of the GABS was 0.94, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.94 and 0.98 respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.6, to discriminate patients with a history of falls in the last twelve months, for a cut-off score of 13 points. Conclusions Our study shows that the Brazilian version of the GABS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess gait and balance in PD. .

Objetivo Validar a Escala Clínica de Marcha e Equilíbrio (GABS) para a população brasileira com doença de Parkinson (DP) e compará-la com a Escala de Equilíbrio de Berg (BBS). Métodos 107 pacientes com diagnóstico de DP foram avaliados através das escalas versão reduzida da UPDRS motora, Hoehn e Yahr, Schwab e England, Escala de Medo de Quedas Internacional, Escala de Congelamento da Marcha, GABS e BBS. Resultados A consistência interna da escala foi 0,94, a confiabilidade inter-examinador 0,98 e intra-examinador 0,94. Curva ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) de 0,72, com sensibilidade de 0,75 e especificidade de 0,60 para discriminar pacientes com história de queda nos últimos 12 meses, para uma nota de corte de 13 pontos. Conclusão Nosso estudo demonstra que a versão brasileira da GABS é válida para avaliar a marcha e o equilíbrio em pacientes com DP. .