Emergency management of patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia: consensus recommendations from the French reference center for inherited platelet disorders.

Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is a genetic bleeding disorder characterised by severely reduced/absent platelet aggregation in response to multiple physiological agonists. The severity of bleeding in GT varies markedly, as does the emergency situations and complications encountered in patients. A number of emergency situations may occur in the context of GT, including spontaneous or provoked bleeding, such as surgery or childbirth. While general management principles apply in each of these settings, specific considerations are essential for the management of GT to avoid escalating minor bleeding events. These recommendations have been developed from a literature review and consensus from experts of the French Network for Inherited Platelet Disorders, the French Society of Emergency Medicine, representatives of patients' associations, and Orphanet to aid decision making and optimise clinical care by non-GT expert health professionals who encounter emergency situations in patients with GT.

Risk factors for failed first intubation attempt in an out-of-hospital setting: a multicenter prospective study.

This study was performed to identify variables potentially associated with failure of the first intubation attempt in an out-of-hospital emergency setting, considering all aspects of tracheal intubation. This observational prospective multicenter study was performed over 17 months and involved 10 prehospital emergency medical units. After each tracheal intubation, the operator was required to provide information concerning operator and patient characteristics, as well as the environmental conditions during intubation, by completing a data collection form. The primary endpoint was failure of the first intubation attempt. During the study period, 1546 patients were analyzed, of whom 59% were in cardiac arrest; 486 intubations failed on the first attempt (31.4% [95% confidence interval = 30.2-32.6]). Multivariate analysis revealed that the following 7 of 28 factors were associated with an increased risk of a failed first intubation attempt: operator with fewer than 50 prior intubations (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8 [1.4-2.4]), small inter-incisor space (OR = 2.3 [1.7-3.2]), limited extension of the head (OR = 1.6 [1.1-2.1]), macroglossia (OR = 2.3 [1.6-3.2]), ear/nose/throat (ENT) tumor (OR = 4.4 [1.4-13.4]), cardiac arrest (OR = 1.8 [1.3-2.6]), and vomiting (OR = 1.7 [1.3-2.3]). The frequency of adverse events among non-cardiac arrest patients was 17.6%; it increased with each additional intubation attempt. The first intubation attempt failed in more than 30% of cases, and seven variables were associated with increased risk of failure. Most of these factors could not be predicted.

Guidelines for the management of urgent obstetric situations in emergency medicine, 2022.

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations on the management of urgent obstetrical emergencies outside the maternity ward. DESIGN: A group of 24 experts from the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU), the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) was convened. Potential conflicts of interest were formally declared at the outset of the guideline development process, which was conducted independently of industry funding. The authors followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method to assess the level of evidence in the literature. The potential drawbacks of strong recommendations in the presence of low-level evidence were highlighted. Some recommendations with an insufficient level of evidence were not graded. METHODS: Eight areas were defined: imminent delivery, postpartum haemorrhage (prevention and management), threat of premature delivery, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, trauma, imaging, cardiopulmonary arrest, and emergency obstetric training. For each field, the expert panel formulated questions according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) and an extensive literature search was conducted. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were conducted according to the GRADE method. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations on the management of obstetrical emergencies were issued by the SFMU/SFAR/CNGOF panel of experts, and 4 recommendations from formalised expert recommendations (RFE) established by the same societies were taken up to answer 4 PICO questions dealing with the pre-hospital context. After two rounds of voting and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. For two questions (cardiopulmonary arrest and inter-hospital transfer), no recommendation could be made. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant agreement among the experts on strong recommendations to improve practice in the management of urgent obstetric complications in emergency medicine.

Assessment of rewarming methods in unplanned out-of-hospital births from a prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Mobile intensive care units frequently manage unplanned out-of-hospital births (UOHB). Rewarming methods during pre-hospital management of UOHB have not yet been compared. The aim was to compare rewarming methods used during pre-hospital management in a large prospective cohort of UOHB in France. METHODS: We analysed UOHB from the prospective AIE cohort from 25 prehospital emergency medical services in France. The primary outcome was the change in body temperature from arrival at scene to arrival at hospital. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 1854 UOHB were recorded, of whom 520 were analysed. We found that using incubator care was the most effective rewarming method (+ 0.8 °C during transport), followed by the combination of plastic bag, skin-to-skin and cap (+ 0.2 °C). The associations plastic bag + cap and skin-to-skin + cap did not allow the newborn to be warmed up but rather to maintain initial temperature (+ 0.0 °C). The results of the multivariate model were consistent with these observations, with better rewarming with the use of an incubator. We also identified circumstances of increased risk of hypothermia according to classification and regression tree, like premature birth (< 37 weeks of gestation) and/or low outside temperature (< 8.4 °C). CONCLUSIONS: Using an incubator was the most effective rewarming method during pre-hospital management of UOHB in our French prospective cohort. Based on our model, in cases of term less than 37 weeks of gestation or between 37 and 40 weeks with a low outside temperature or initial hypothermia, using such a method would be preferred.

Unplanned out-of-hospital birth and risk factors of adverse perinatal outcome: findings from a prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: In France, while most babies are delivered at hospital, emergency medical services (EMS) weekly manage calls for unplanned out-of-hospital births. The objective of our study was to describe neonatal morbidity and mortality, defined as death or neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization at Day 7, in a prospective multicentric cohort of unplanned out-of-hospital births. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed out-of-hospital births from 25 prehospital EMS units in France. The primary outcome was neonatal morbidity and mortality, and the secondary outcome was risk factors associated with neonatal morbidity and mortality. A univariate logistic regression was first made, followed by a multivariate logistic regression with backward selection. RESULTS: From October 2011 to August 2018, a total of 1670 unplanned out-of-hospital births were included. Of these, 1652 (99.2%) were singleton and 1537 (93.5%) had prenatal care. Maternal mean age of the study population was 30 ± 5.5 (range 15 to 48). The majority of women were multiparous, but 13% were nulliparous. Overall, 45.3% of these unplanned out-of-hospital births were medically-driven, either by phone during medical regulation (12.5%) or on scene by the prehospital emergency medical service units (32.9%). The prevalence of neonatal morbidity and mortality was 6.3% (n = 106) after an unplanned out-of-hospital birth (death before Day 7: n = 20; 1.2%). The multivariate logistic regression found that multiparity (adjusted Odds Ratio = 70.7 [4.7-1062]), prematurity (adjusted Odds Ratio = 6.7 [2.1-21.4]), maternal pathology (adjusted Odds Ratio = 2.8 [1.0-7.5]) and hypothermia (adjusted Odds Ratio = 2.8 [1.1-7.6]) were independent predictive factors of neonatal morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our study assessed for the first time risk factors for adverse perinatal outcome in a large and multicenter cohort of unplanned out-of-hospital births. We have to improve temperature management in the out-of-hospital field and future trials are required to investigate strategies to optimize newborns management in the prehospital area.

[Feasibility study of a call centre to reduce non-scheduled visits and unjustified consultations in pediatric emergencies units]. / Réduction des consultations non programmées et non justifiées dans le cadre des urgences pédiatriques grâce à une plateforme téléphonique.

INTRODUCTION: Non-justified and non-scheduled visits to emergency units are ever increasing and consequently overburden their staff. Because it seems necessary to meet this heavy demand of urgent health care, a possible solution could be to set up phone call centers dedicated to pediatric care. First, when people call the emergency number, the SAMU doctors will field these calls and immediately determine the degree of urgency of the situation before transferring the call to the appropriate standardized call center who will then advise the caller as to how to proceed. OBJECTIVE: To access the technical feasibility of setting up this call center which will be in place with the already existing emergency call system and also to ascertain if the system will indeed reduce the number of unnecessary emergency medical consultations. METHODS: The standardized information and advice given by this call center concerning fever, diarrhoea, crying, head trauma, respiratory obstruction in the young infant comes from the consensus of the association of Courlygones pediatric doctors. As a follow up to the initial contact with the caller, nurses call the families back seven days later to find out if the families did finally take their child to the emergency room or not and also to see if the callers retained the necessary advice given through the call center. Finally, the nurses request that the families assess their own satisfaction will this new call service. RESULTS: Over a period of 97 days, 250 calls were fielded. In 84% of the cases (n=210/250), calls came from parents and most of them (109/198, 55.05%) had only a single child. On average, each call lasted between 5 to 8 minutes. 97% of the callers (n=178/183) were satisfied by the advice given. Following the call, 128 callers /215 (59.53%) asked an additional medical advice within 20 h and 61.71% (n=79/128) of them actually took their child to a scheduled medical consultation. Only 2.34% of the 128 callers were finally hospitalized. DISCUSSION: Our results confirm the technical feasibility to set up a call centre dedicated to paediatrics and its positive impact on the number of non-scheduled and non-justified visits to emergency units.