The Maintenance Model of Restrictive Practices: A Trauma-Informed, Integrated Model to Explain Repeated Use of Restrictive Practices in Mental Health Care Settings.

Nurses are at the forefront of care in mental health services but their role is conflicted; they carry the most responsibility for care and also for restrictive practices. The harmful effects of restrictive practices for mental health patients are well documented, have attracted negative media attention, public concern, and criticism directed specifically at nursing staff. The need to reduce restrictive practices has been highlighted by patients, carer groups, legislators, policy makers, academics, and mental health service providers. Policies and best practice guidelines have resulted, but restrictive practices remain a global problem. This theory paper proposes that inertia is partly due to the absence of a coherent model that explains the initiation and maintenance of restrictive practice in inpatient mental health settings. The conceptual development and synthesis of the model and its practical implications are discussed.

Readmission after discharge from a medium secure service between 1999 and 2017: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous research into outcomes after treatment in medium secure psychiatric hospitals has mostly relied on pre-millennium data. AIMS: To examine patient and inpatient service-related factors associated with readmission within 2 years following discharge to the community or open conditions from conditions of medium security. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 137 patients discharged either to the community or to open conditions from one 64-bed South Wales Regional Medium Secure Hospital Unit between July 1999 and November 2017 was completed using data from healthcare records to document demographics, diagnosis and nature of index offences together with researcher-completed ratings of inpatient progress using the Dangerousness Understanding Recovery and Urgency Manual (DUNDRUM) Programme Completion and DUNDRUM Recovery scales. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent associations between inpatient progress according to these measures and readmission. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (31%) were readmitted within 2 years of discharge and 23 (17%) in breach of legal conditions on discharge. Most readmitted patients (n = 29, 67%) returned directly to medium secure care. There were significant binary level associations between readmission and severity of the index offences (lower), number of adverse childhood experiences (higher), history of drug misuse (more likely) and number of previous psychiatric admissions (higher). Binary logistic regression confirmed that these relationships were not independent. No inpatient service-related variables, according to DUNDRUM scale scores, showed an independent association with readmission within 2 years post-discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of medium security hospital patients who were readmitted within 2 years of discharge aligns with estimates found in earlier national research using the same follow-up period. Since levels of inpatient progress bore little if any relationship to longer term outcomes, our findings highlight the need for investigating factors in the discharge environment that are linked to readmission. It is possible that readmission may indicate effective monitoring and responsive care to the changing needs of patients, but a better understanding of this is essential.

Predictors of recovery in a medium secure service: Influence of the Welsh Government's Mental Health (2010) Measure.

BACKGROUND: Research to date has failed to examine the effectiveness of MSUs in facilitating recovery, or the influence that mental health policy may have on this process. Examining predictors of short-term clinical outcomes during inpatient admission and the effects of policy changes may inform future policy, treatment planning and may improve service user outcomes. AIMS: To examine whether service user admission characteristics and length of stay predicted recovery status at discharge from medium secure care and whether a recovery-focused change in policy (introduction of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure (2010)) impacted either on recovery or the relationship between service user characteristics and recovery. METHODS: The study adopted a retrospective analysis of quantitative data obtained from healthcare records from a Welsh MSU between 2007 and 2017 (n = 198). The DUNDUM-4 scale assessed recovery whilst DUNDRUM-2 assessed security need at admission. Service user admission characteristics included HCR-20 subscale scores, previous security-level transitions, adverse childhood experiences, substance misuse histories. RESULTS: Shorter inpatient stays and higher scores on the dynamic HCR-20 clinical subscale were associated with poorer recovery outcomes. The relationship between admission characteristics and recovery endured despite changes in policy. Implementation of recovery focused legislation was associated with improved recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that treatment should focus on dynamic risk factors to improve service user outcomes and highlights the need for long-term medium-secure provision for some. Further research is needed to evaluate the success of MSUs and the validity of the DUNDRUM-4 across UK secure services.

A randomized controlled trial of a Group psychological intervention to increase locus of control for alcohol consumption among Alcohol-Misusing Short-term (male) Prisoners (GASP).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Reducing alcohol misuse by male prisoners is an important global issue. Control of drinking behaviour could be a useful target for intervention in this population, and locus of control could be a causal factor in this. We aimed to assess the effect of a clinical psychologist-facilitated group intervention on male prisoners' locus of control of drinking behaviour. DESIGN: A two-arm, single-site, open, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A category B local training prison in South Wales, housing about 770 mainly sentenced men. PARTICIPANTS: Prisoners serving less than 2 years who met inclusion criteria for pre-imprisonment alcohol misuse, alone or with drug misuse. A total of 119 were allocated to the intervention arm and 119 to the control arm; 104 and 87, respectively, completed the post-randomization baseline interview and 68 and 60 completed a second interview approximately 4 weeks later, respectively, after intervention or treatment as usual (TAU) alone. INTERVENTION: Nine clinical psychologist-facilitated groups in the prison over 3 weeks. Range of participants per session was one to seven, with three to five most usual. MEASURES: The primary outcome was locus of control of behaviour (LCB); secondary outcomes included mental state generally (comprehensive psychiatric rating scale/CPRS) and specifically (Beck Depression Inventory/BDI). An integral process evaluation was conducted. FINDINGS: LCB scores decreased during the study, but without significant intervention effect [-1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -5.1 to 1.6, P = 0.329]. Change among completers in the control group was from a mean score of 37.4 [standard deviation (SD) = 10.0] to 33.7[SD = 11.7] and in the intervention group from 37.4 (SD = 11.6) to 31.9 (SD = 11.8). Secondary outcomes, including change in mental state, did not differ between arms, but 686 (64%) sessions were lost, most because of 'prison issues'. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical psychologist-facilitated group intervention did not have a statistically significant effect on sense of control of drinking behaviour among men with pre-imprisonment alcohol misuse serving less than 2 years in a South Wales prison. The study proved coterminous, however, with 40% prison staff cuts which seem likely to have contributed to the high loss of group sessions and possibly overwhelmed any treatment effect. Intervention completion failures, previously cited as harmful, had no effect here, so the trial should be repeated when the prison climate improves.

External validity and anchoring heuristics: application of DUNDRUM-1 to secure service gatekeeping in South Wales.

Aims and method Structured clinical judgement tools provide scope for the standardisation of forensic service gatekeeping and also allow identification of heuristics in this decision process. The DUNDRUM-1 triage tool was completed retrospectively for 121 first-time referrals to forensic services in South Wales. Fifty were admitted to medium security, 49 to low security and 22 remained in open conditions. RESULTS: DUNDRUM-1 total scores differed appropriately between different levels of security. However, regression revealed heuristic anchoring on the 'legal process' and 'immediacy of risk due to mental disorder' items. Clinical implications Patient placement was broadly aligned with DUNDRUM-1 recommendations. However, not all triage items informed gatekeeping decisions. It remains to be seen whether decisions anchored in this way are effective. Declaration of interest Dr Mark Freestone gave permission for AUC values from Freestone et al. (2015) to be presented here for comparison.

Executive function in psychopathy: the Tower of London, Brixton Spatial Anticipation and the Hayling Sentence Completion Tests.

Executive dysfunction in those high on traits of psychopathy has often been reported, with many disagreements as to the nature of the dysfunction. We aimed to see if tests of planning and rule acquisition/adherence would discriminate those high on psychopathic traits. A battery of executive function tests (Tower of London, Brixton Spatial Anticipation, and Hayling Sentence Completion Tasks) was given to 28 British male prisoners. Psychopathy was measured using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. High psychopathy was related to reduced planning in the Tower of London Test and poor rule-adherence on the Brixton Test. Other tests of executive function were not related to psychopathy. The results appear supportive of the notion that function of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is dysfunctional in psychopathy whilst that of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is normal and suggest that impulsivity in those high on psychopathy traits impedes planning and rule following. We suggest the adapted Tower of London Test and the Brixton Test could be useful objective measures of this type of impulsivity in offenders which could help identify key treatment goals.

Predicting institutional violence in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of the VRAG and the HCR-20.

BACKGROUND: There is a developing evidence base to support the use of risk assessment instruments in offenders with intellectual disability (ID). The aim of this study was to try to develop this literature with the inclusion of a control group of mentally disordered offenders without an ID, using the HCR-20 and VRAG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VRAG and the HCR-20 were completed for a group of offenders with an ID (n = 25) and a control group (n = 45), in four medium-secure units across the UK. The outcome measure was physical aggression measured over 6 months. RESULTS: Both instruments consistently produced large effect sizes predicting any physical aggression and severe physical aggression. The structured clinical judgement based on the HCR-20 was especially good. CONCLUSIONS: The HCR-20 and the VRAG have excellent predictive efficacy in offenders with an ID. A structured clinical judgement based on the HCR-20 was especially predictive.