ECAP analysis in cochlear implant patients as a function of patient's age and electrode-design.

INTRODUCTION: Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) provide information about the nerve's and device's function in and after cochlear implantation. In general, lower ECAP values are expected to generate better results. Aim was an analysis of ECAPs in the course of time as a function of the patient's age and electrode design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2013, 168 patients of eight defined age groups were included into the investigation. NRTs were measured intraoperatively, after 6 and after 12months. RESULTS: The intraoperative mean value of ECAP was 174.14CL (current level) and decreased after 6months to 156.38CL. Highest ECAPs were achieved intraoperatively in the clusters "younger than 18months" (181.04CL) and "older than 80 years" (190.45CL). CI 422 showed apparently higher ECAP thresholds (182.69) during surgery than CI 24 RE (171.47) and CI 512 (170.64). CONCLUSION: ECAPs are a well-established method to get information about the CI's and nerve's function during and after surgery. After initial higher values NRTs decrease after 6months and remain stable in the following controls. Very young and older patients tend to have higher thresholds than middle-aged groups. Perimodiolar electrodes are significantly attached to lower values because there is a closer nerve-electrode interaction.

[Surgical Risk Profile and Audiological Outcome in the Elderly after Cochlea-implantation]. / Operatives Risikoprofil und Hör-Spracherfolg bei älteren Cochlea-Implantat-Patienten.

BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients with indication for cochlear implantation is increasing. Our aim was to investigate whether seniors with cochlea implants differ from younger patients with regard to hearing improvement, surgical complications and rehabilitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients older than 60 years (ys) having received a cochlea implant in 2007-2012 were included (Group I 60-70 ys; Group II <70 ys). Preoperative risk factors according to ASA-Criteria and postoperative complications were analyzed. Improvements in quality of live were evaluated by questionnaire. Audiological outcome was tested by Freiburger speech test and OLSA sentence test with background noise. Patients with comparable conditions for cochlea implantation between 40 and 59 years of age served as control group (Group K). RESULTS: Patient cohort consisted of 94 patients, 29 of which being older than 70 years. Severe complications were inexistent postoperatively. Gr. II achieved a speech perception for numbers of 95% (65 dB) and 50% (65 dB) for monosyllables. The speech perception in Gr. II was not significantly different from Gr. I or K. According to the quality of life test all groups experienced an improvement in their social life. CONCLUSION: Old age itself is no contraindication to cochlea implantation. It has little influence on the postoperative speech perception even though the learning curve of the elderly rises slower. However, careful assessment with regard to surgical risk factors and expected outcome is necessary.

[Optimizing interdisciplinary flow of information : development of a communication system for a cochlear implant center with out-patient rehabilitation]. / Optimierung des interdisziplinären Informationsflusses : Entwicklung eines Kommunikationssystems für ein Cochlear-implant-Zentrum mit ambulanter Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Due to the growing number of cochlear implant (CI) patients, a well organized system of patient data allowing swift access is required. Therefore, a databank has been designed to achieve an effective interdisciplinary flow of information between diagnostics, therapy and rehabilitation. METHODS: The departments of audiology, CI fitting, speech and hearing rehabilitation, logopaedics and medical staff were requested to design forms containing relevant data for the evaluation of diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitation outcome. Forms were optimized and finally adjusted to an Access database. Time management and satisfaction of employees were evaluated by questionnaire. The local ethics committee authorized the project. RESULTS: To achieve optimal administration of CI patient data a working platform founded on an Access data base was designed. Patient data were available almost immediately after diagnosis and therapy to all other partners within the CI centre, leading to better time management in the planning of CI therapy and consequently improved rehabilitation. In addition, internal communication between the different disciplines improved significantly. A number of data sheets are used to illustrate how the database functions. CONCLUSION: Using this database we were able to improve the flow of information in our CI centre, as well as significantly reduce the time required for administrative tasks such as letters to doctors, health insurances, schools. Finally, data are available for scientific and economic purposes, including their possible long-term integration in an electronic patient file.

[A multicentre comparative study of the ESPrit and the Nucleus 22]. / Multizentrumstudie über ESPrit 3G für Nucleus 22. Eine vergleichende Studie.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant recipients often report additional difficulty in comprehension of speech in noisy conditions and of softly spoken speech. The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the performance advantages offered by the ear level ESPrit 3G for experienced Nucleus Mini 22 cochlear implantees. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight German-speaking implanted subjects, who had had experience with either the Spectra 22 or the ESPrit 22 for at least 6 months, were evaluated with their current processor and the ESPrit 3G (on microphone, M, and whisper, W, settings) following a 4-week trial. Freiburger monosyllabic words (FMW) were used at soft and conversational levels in quiet conditions and Oldenburger sentences (OLSA) were used in noisy conditions to compare performance. Subjective impressions of sound quality and user aspects were evaluated and combined with data from 31 English-speaking subjects from a parallel study. RESULTS: In comparison to the previously worn processor, statistically significantly superior performance (p<0.001) was observed at soft and conversational levels in quiet conditions for FMW in 15 subjects when using the W setting and in noisy conditions for the OLSA in 21 subjects when using the M setting (p<0.001). The ESPrit 3G was preferred by 86% of subjects (51/59). CONCLUSION: The ESPrit 3G for Nucleus 22 users has the potential to further improve speech understanding in quiet conditions at soft intensity levels and also in noisy conditions at conversational levels relative to the currently worn speech processor, the Spectra 22 or the ESPrit 22, for the majority of subjects. Subjectively, together with the improvement in sound quality, the majority of subjects also reported improved ease of use and wearer comfort.

[Cochlear implantation: relationship between speech development and insertion depth in children]. / Cochlear Implantation--Zusammenhang zwischen Sprachentwicklung und Insertionstiefe der Elektrode bei Kindern.

BACKGROUND: The goal in pediatric cochlear implantation is improved hearing leading to better speech development, which may allow their integration into mainstream schools. Whether the intracochlear position of the electrode array has an influence on speech development or not is controversially discussed. PATIENTS: Between 1996 and 1998 29 children ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 years (median 4 years) were provided with a Nucleus 22M or 24M cochlear implant system. Speech and language skills were assessed by a closed-set test (Mainzer test) and by the Schmid-Giovannini score for hearing development pre-implantation and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-implantation. The position of the electrode array was determined by the surgical record and by a postoperative transorbital x-ray. Since the promontory has a thickness of one to two electrode bands, we defined deep insertion as more than 24 bands intracochlear. RESULTS: The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the insertion depth: Group 1 (n = 8) 24 bands (22 electrodes and 2 stiffening rings correspond to < or = 18 mm) or less and group 2 (n = 21) more than 24 bands intracochlear correspond to > 18 mm). The mean closed-set test scores 12 months post-implantation were 51.4% and 68.5% for group 1 and group 2, respectively. Schmid-Giovannini test scores were 8.7 for group 1 and 10.1 for group 2. There was no significant statistical difference in the closed-set and Schmid-Giovannini test scores. We observed incomplete insertion (i.e. less than 22 active bands are intracochlear) because of electrode extrusion in only one child. CONCLUSION: Speech development in children does not improve with deeper insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array.

[Ambulatory rehabilitation after cochlear prosthesis implantation]. / Ambulante Rehabilitation nach Cochlear-Implant-Versorgung.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compares the results of the outpatient-based program of the Cochlear Implant Center Ruhr with inpatient-based rehabilitation, which is almost exclusively performed in Germany. PATIENTS/METHODS: The Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University of Essen in Germany provided 52 patients with either 22- or 24-channel Nucleus cochlear implants from March 1996 to July 1999. Almost all patients (n = 49) were rehabilitated on an outpatient basis, which is the standard in many cochlear implant centers outside Germany. RESULTS: The longest follow-up period at the University of Essen Department of Otorhinolaryngology was 36 months. Minor complications occurred in 10% of the patients. After 24 months, the first three implanted patients were able to discriminate 100% of numbers and over 60% of syllables in the Freiburg speech discrimination test. The patients who developed an understanding of open speech were able to discriminate 31 words per minute with cochlear implant and without lipreading after 24 months. Children were seen to double their Schmid-Giovannini scores at 6 months postimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The Essen outpatient-based cochlear implant program demonstrates results in speech development and speech understanding equal to those of centers providing inpatient rehabilitation. A special advantage is continuous rehabilitation with professionals known to the child for several years. In children especially, exhaustive commuting reduces school attendance and is a burden on the accompanying guardians. As an inpatient, however, the child is torn from his familiar environment. Parents with several children have particular difficulties in accompanying their child and indeed this may not always be possible.