Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Reprod Biomed ; 21(3): 205-212, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37122892

RESUMO

Background: The implantation rate after assisted reproductive technology depends on 2 important factors, good quality embryo and endometrial receptivity. Endometrial receptivity is mainly assessed by ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness and morphology. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between uterine artery Doppler indices/endometrial perfusion and pregnancy rate. Materials and Methods: This cohort study was done on 250 women who were candidates for frozen embryo transfer from January to July 2022. For assessing endometrial receptivity, we performed a Doppler ultrasound of the uterus before embryo transfer with apparently desirable endometrium (endometrial thickness ≥ 7 mm and 3 line endometrial pattern). In addition, the women were divided into 2 groups according to assisted reproductive technology outcome (clinical pregnancy), group I positive clinical pregnancy, and group II negative clinical pregnancy, and uterine artery indices and endometrial perfusion were compared between these groups. Results: Uterine artery Doppler showed that the pulsatility index was significantly different between positive and negative clinical pregnancy groups, but resistance index and peak systolic velocity (PSV) did not have statistically significant differences. Also, endometrial perfusion was significantly different between the 2 groups of clinical pregnancy. Endometrial perfusion was significantly better in positive clinical pregnancy groups. Conclusion: Doppler ultrasound can help to assess endometrial receptivity.

2.
Int J Reprod Biomed ; 21(12): 1021-1030, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38370492

RESUMO

Background: Overweight and obese people face several health problems. Female obesity has been shown to reduce fertility in the general population. Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in obese cases are widely studied, but the results are inconclusive. Objective: This study aimed to compare live birth rate (LBR) among women with 4 different types of body mass index (BMI). Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data of 1611 women, who were candidates for fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles, was extracted from 2051 medical files at the Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from May 2019-May 2021. The participants were divided into 4 groups (underweight, normal, overweight, and obese) according to their BMI, and LBR was considered to be the main outcome. Results: Of 1611 women, 39 were underweight, 585 were normal, 676 were overweight, and 311 were obese. Underweight women had the lowest LBR (12.8%), but there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.55). In addition, LBR was compared in the 4 BMI groups according to age, type of transfer cycle (fresh or freeze), and cause of infertility, and there was comparable LBR in the 4 BMI groups. However, metaphase 2 oocyte rate, doses of gonadotropin usage in the cycles, and estradiol level had statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). Conclusion: According to our study, obesity does not affect LBR in the IVF cycle, regardless of fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles, different age groups, and causes of infertility.

3.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol ; 43(3): 315-326, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34165032

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a newly emerged respiratory illness, which has spread around the world. Pregnant women are exposed to additional pressure due to the indirect adverse effects of this pandemic on their physical and mental health. Since the psychological wellness framework is weak in developing countries, it is likely that geographical factors affect the prevalence. Therefore, the goal of this meta-analysis is to investigate the prevalence of anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library for articles. The quality of studies was determined based on the STROBE checklist. I2 and Cochrane Q-test were used to determine heterogeneity. Fixed effects and/or random effects models were also employed to estimate pooled prevalence. RESULTS: Since heterogeneity was fairly high in all analyses, the random effect model was used. According to the results of random effects in the meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence was 18.7% (95% CI: 0.06-0.36%; I2=99%,P<0.001) for anxiety and 25.1% (95% CI: 0.18-0.33%; I2=97%, P<0.001) for depression. The results of continent subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of anxiety was higher in western country (38%) than in Asia country (7.8%). The prevalence of anxiety in Italy (38%), Canada (56%), Pakistan (14%), Greece (53%), Sri Lanka (17.5%), and China (0.3-29%) and Iran 3.8% as well as the prevalence of depression in Canada (37%), Belgium (25%), Turkey (35.4%), Sri Lanka (19.5%), and China (11-29%) has been reported. CONCLUSION: Covid-19 may impose extra pressure on the emotional wellbeing of pregnant women. Therefore, there is an urgent need for resources to help mitigate anxiety and depression in pregnant women.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gestantes/psicologia , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...