Changes in optical coherence tomography biomarkers in eyes with advanced idiopathic epiretinal membrane treated with dexamethasone implantation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of vitrectomy and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implantation on retinal biomarkers in patients with advanced idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IERM) and to evaluate this treatment's anatomical and functional outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included 41 patients with advanced IERM who underwent vitrectomy and were divided into a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) group (20 eyes) and a dexamethasone (DEX) group (21 eyes) based on intravitreal DEX implantation. We collected data on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), subretinal fluid, intraretinal cystoid changes (IRC), integrity of the inner-outer segment layer, and intraocular pressure. RESULTS: BCVA improved significantly in both groups; the DEX group had a higher visual acuity gain at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.002 and 0.023, respectively). Postoperative CMT gradually decreased in both groups, with the DEX group showing a greater decrease at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.009 and 0.033, respectively). Six months after surgery, the DRIL and IRC grades in the DEX group were significantly improved compared to those in the PPV group (P = 0.037 and 0.038, respectively). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that patients with intraoperative DEX implants were more likely to have a significant CMT reduction (≥ 100 µm) from baseline (odds ratio (OR), 9.44; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.58-56.56; P = 0.014) at 6 months and less likely to exhibit DRIL at 6 months postoperatively (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy combined with intravitreal DEX implantation facilitates the recovery of postoperative visual acuity and improvement of anatomical outcomes in patients with advanced IERM, effectively reducing CMT and improving DRIL.

Microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling versus anti-VEGF intravitreal injection for treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (VVV-DME study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Currently, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injection stands as the first-line therapy for DME. However, some patients exhibit insufficient response to anti-VEGF agents and often require multiple injections, imposing psychological and economic burdens. While microinvasive pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) has been shown to be safe and effective in treating refractory DME, scant research has explored its application to treatment-naïve DME. The purpose of this study is to determine whether early PPV combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling can lessen the therapeutic burden of DME patients, prevent vision loss, and maintain long-term stabilization of diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial involving 102 DME participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the study group (PPV combined with ILM peeling) or the control group (conbercept intravitreal injection (IVC)) at a 1:1 ratio, with a scheduled follow-up at 12 months post-operation. Comparative analysis of results between the two groups will be conducted at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after the intervention. The primary outcomes involve evaluating the changes in central subfield thickness (CST) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The secondary outcomes include assessment of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) biomarkers, re-treatment and adverse events rates, diabetic retinopathy (DR) development, cost-effectiveness analysis, and vision-related quality of life (VRQL). DISCUSSION: Some patients do not respond well to anti-VEGF drugs and repeated intravitreal injections increase the treatment burden for patients. The VVV study aims to explore whether PPV combined with ILM peeling could become an initial treatment option for treatment-naïve DME patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05728476. Registered on 15 February 2023.

Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for long-term low vision after diabetic vitrectomy.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the risk factors and develop a prognostic nomogram of long-term low vision after diabetic vitrectomy. Methods: This retrospective study included 186 patients (250 eyes) that underwent primary vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy with a minimum follow-up period of one year. Patients were assigned to the training cohort (200 eyes) or validation cohort (50 eyes) at a 4:1 ratio randomly. Based on a cutoff value of 0.3 in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, the training cohort was separated into groups with or without low vision. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on preoperative systemic and ocular characteristics to develop a risk prediction model and nomogram. The calibration curve and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to evaluate the calibration and discrimination of the model. The nomogram was internally validated using the bootstrapping method, and it was further verified in an external cohort. Results: Four independent risk factors were selected by stepwise forward regression, including tractional retinal detachment (ß=1.443, OR=4.235, P<0.001), symptom duration ≥6 months (ß=0.954, OR=2.595, P=0.004), preoperative BCVA measurement (ß=0.540, OR=1.716, P=0.033), and hypertension (ß=0.645, OR=1.905, P=0.044). AUC values of 0.764 (95% CI: 0.699-0.829) in the training cohort and 0.755 (95% CI: 0.619-0.891) in the validation cohort indicated the good predictive ability of the model. Conclusion: The prognostic nomogram established in this study is useful for predicting long-term low vision after diabetic vitrectomy.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Revitrectomy in Eyes with Diabetic Vitreous Hemorrhage.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with revitrectomy in eyes with diabetic vitreous hemorrhage and to determine the prognosis of these patients at least one year postoperatively. Patients and Methods: This retrospective case-control study had a minimum follow-up period of one year. Patients were divided into single vitrectomy group (control group, n=202) and revitrectomy group (case group, n=36) for analysis. The indications, number, and timing of revitrectomies were documented. And the revitrectomy group was further divided into two vitrectomies group (n=30) and three or more vitrectomies group (n=6). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last follow-up and the occurrence of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) were compared among the single vitrectomy, two vitrectomies and three or more vitrectomies groups. We conducted a thorough collection of patient data and used univariate and binary logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors associated with revitrectomy. Results: A total of 197 patients (238 eyes) were included. Thirty-six eyes (15.1%) required revitrectomy with six eyes (2.5%) undergoing three or more vitrectomies during the follow-up period. The median duration of the second vitrectomy was 3 (2-6) months. The indications for a second vitrectomy included 28 eyes (77.8%) of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage and 7 eyes (22.2%) combined with tractional retinal detachment. Patients undergoing three or more vitrectomies had significantly worse postoperative BCVA and a higher incidence of NVG (P<0.01). Fibrinogen> 4 g/L (P<0.001) and preoperative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injection (P=0.015) were independent risk factors for revitrectomy, and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)>10% (P=0.049) showed significant difference only in univariate analysis. Conclusion: Patients requiring revitrectomy tended to have higher fibrinogen levels, tightly adhered fibrovascular membranes, higher HbA1c levels, and worse prognoses.