[Argentine Consensus of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema]. / Consenso argentino de diagnóstico y tratamiento del angioedema hereditario.

OBJECTIVES: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease. During the last years, many studies and advances have been developed with the aim of better understanding the pathophysiology, as well as optimizing patient management. Several international working groups have attempted to clarify and standardize the care of HAE communicated as guidelines and consensus recommendations. We considered necessary to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HAE in Argentina. METHODS: A group of specialists of allergy and immunology from Argentina by using the online surveys methodology as well as face to face meetings developed the intended consensus. RESULTS: Recommendations were established based on published evidence and the expert opinion. The consensus focused on diagnosis, acute management of attacks, short and long-term prophylaxis, special situations (pediatrics and pregnancy) and disease management considering the health care system in Argentina. CONCLUSION: The recommendations established in this consensus guidelines will optimize the management of patients with HAE in Argentina.

Objetivos: El angioedema hereditario es una enfermedad poco frecuente. Durante los últimos años se han desarrollado muchas investigaciones y registrado avances con el objetivo de entender mejor la fisiopatología y optimizar la atención a los pacientes. Diversos grupos de trabajo internacionales han intentado clarificar y normalizar el cuidado de pacientes con angioedema hereditario, lo que se ha reflejado en guías y consensos. Consideramos necesario desarrollar un documento de consenso con recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del angioedema hereditario en Argentina. Metodología: Un grupo de expertos de Argentina, conformado por especialistas en Alergia e Inmunología mediante metodología de ronda de encuestas a distancia y reuniones presenciales llevó adelante la elaboración del consenso pretendido. Resultados: Se establecieron recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia publicada y en el criterio de los expertos participantes. Las recomendaciones se enfocaron en el diagnóstico, tratamiento y profilaxis de las crisis a corto y largo plazo, control de situaciones especiales y consideraciones del sistema de salud en Argentina. Conclusión: Las recomendaciones establecidas en este consenso permitirán optimizar la atención médica de los pacientes con angioedema hereditario en Argentina.

Una causa infrecuente de disnea / An infrequent cause of dyspnea

Paciente masculino de 28 años, ex tabaquista (fumó hasta los 26 años, 18 paq/año), antecedentes de nefrectomía derecha por cáncer de riñón en los 3 años previos. Seguimiento por oncología, en remisión

Rupatadine oral solution in children with persistent allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. No large, multicentre clinical trials in children with persistent allergic rhinitis (PER) have previously been performed. Rupatadine, a newer second-generation antihistamine, effective and safe in adults, is a promising treatment for children with AR. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new rupatadine oral solution in children aged 6-11 yr with PER. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out worldwide. Patients between 6 and 11 yr with a diagnosis of PER according to ARIA criteria were randomized to receive either rupatadine oral solution (1 mg/ml) or placebo over 6 wk. The primary efficacy end-point was the change from baseline of the total nasal symptoms score (T4SS) after 4 wk of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were randomized to rupatadine (n = 180) or placebo (n = 180) treatment. Rupatadine showed statistically significant differences vs. placebo for the T4SS reduction both at 4 (-2.5 ± 1.9 vs. -3.1 ± 2.1; p = 0.018) and 6 wk (-2.7 ± 1.9 vs. -3.3 ± 2.1; p = 0.048). Rupatadine also showed a statistically better improvement in the children's quality of life compared with placebo. Adverse reactions were rare and non-serious in both treatment groups. No QTc or laboratory test abnormalities were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Rupatadine oral solution (1 mg/ml) was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing nasal symptoms at 4 and 6 wk and was well tolerated overall. This is the first large clinical report on the efficacy of an H1 receptor antagonist in children with PER in both symptoms and quality of life.