Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Anal Toxicol ; 45(3): 243-251, 2021 Mar 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32591786

RESUMO

As the number of prescriptions, over-the-counter medications and drugs of abuse continue to increase, forensic laboratories are faced with the challenge of developing more comprehensive screening methods in order to detect them in whole blood samples. Another challenge faced by forensic laboratories is detecting and identifying novel synthetic compounds as they emerge and change. Traditional drug screening methods include enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and either gas or liquid chromatography paired with mass spectrometry (GC-MS or LC-MS-MS, respectively). While these methods are good, they have their disadvantages. For example, EIA requires special reagents for each drug class, GC-MS requires extensive sample preparation, and LC-MS-MS only detects drugs on a known inclusion lists of compounds of interest. Described here is the development of a robust and comprehensive screening method for drugs in whole blood samples that eliminates the aforementioned disadvantages of the traditional methods. Using a Q Exactive Focus™ liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate mass spectrometer (LC-HRMS-MS), a method was developed that is capable of detecting ~200 drugs at a concentration of 2 µg/L for most analytes. This method also employs a more automated data processing feature which reduces processing time. Finally, it has the added benefit of retroactive data analysis, which allows it to be used for unknown drug analysis as well. Used as an initial screening method, the comprehensive drug screen using LC-HRMS-MS has the potential to take on two of the most important challenges faced by forensic laboratories today.


Assuntos
Laboratórios , Cromatografia Líquida , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas , Espectrometria de Massas
2.
J Anal Toxicol ; 40(8): 649-652, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27562965

RESUMO

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation utilized a silylation method of analysis for low molecular weight carboxylic acids in the past. Due to the negative impact such derivatizations can have on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) systems an alternative means of analysis was investigated. The described method is a whole blood solid phase extraction of valproic acid, salicylic acid and ibuprofen utilizing butylation for sensitivity and improved chromatography by GC-MS. The method produced a limit of detection and limit of quantitation at 1 mg/L for valproic acid, 2 mg/L for salicylic acid and 0.25 mg/L for ibuprofen. The variability based upon the middle of the calibration curve estimated to be 7% for valproic acid, 8% for salicylic acid and 11% for ibuprofen established upon a 95% confidence interval, with the highest percent coefficient of variation being 5.3% for ibuprofen.


Assuntos
Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas , Ibuprofeno/sangue , Ácido Salicílico/sangue , Ácido Valproico/sangue , Calibragem , Georgia , Humanos , Limite de Detecção , Peso Molecular , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Extração em Fase Sólida , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...