Hepatitis C, mental health and equity of access to antiviral therapy: a systematic narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Access to hepatitis C (hereafter HCV) antiviral therapy has commonly excluded populations with mental health and substance use disorders because they were considered as having contraindications to treatment, particularly due to the neuropsychiatric effects of interferon that can occur in some patients. In this review we examined access to HCV interferon antiviral therapy by populations with mental health and substance use problems to identify the evidence and reasons for exclusion. METHODS: We searched the following major electronic databases for relevant articles: PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria comprised studies of adults aged 18 years and older, peer-reviewed articles, date range of (2002-2012) to include articles since the introduction of pegylated interferon with ribarvirin, and English language. The exclusion criteria included articles about HCV populations with medical co-morbidities, such as hepatitis B (hereafter HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (hereafter HIV), because the clinical treatment, pathways and psychosocial morbidity differ from populations with only HCV. We identified 182 articles, and of these 13 met the eligibility criteria. Using an approach of systematic narrative review we identified major themes in the literature. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified including: (1) pre-treatment and preparation for antiviral therapy, (2) adherence and treatment completion, and (3) clinical outcomes. Each of these themes was critically discussed in terms of access by patients with mental health and substance use co-morbidities demonstrating that current research evidence clearly demonstrates that people with HCV, mental health and substance use co-morbidities have similar clinical outcomes to those without these co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: While research evidence is largely supportive of increased access to interferon by people with HCV, mental health and substance use co-morbidities, there is substantial further work required to translate evidence into clinical practice. Further to this, we conclude that a reconsideration of the appropriateness of the tertiary health service model of care for interferon management is required and exploration of the potential for increased HCV care in primary health care settings.

General practitioner attitudes to prescribing hepatitis C antiviral therapy in a community setting.

There is a growing debate about the prescription of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral therapies within a community setting in Australia. This study aimed to identify interest and confidence among general practitioners (GPs) in prescribing HCV antiviral therapy in a community setting. Data from 580 GPs who responded to a cross-sectional population-based survey were analysed to measure: self-reported interest and confidence in initiating HCV antiviral therapy; and/or prescribing maintenance antiviral therapy; and self-perceived education needs about HCV antiviral therapy. Forty-two percent of respondents indicated they would be interested in prescribing HCV antiviral therapy. Most were not confident to initiate therapy (80%). Higher proportions indicated that they would be more confident in prescribing maintenance therapy (35%) rather than initiating (7%) therapy (z=10.5, P<0.001). Confidence in prescribing was related to a higher caseload of patients with HCV (P=0.001) and being a HIV community-based prescriber (P=0.002). Fifty-three percent of respondents expressed an interest in education about HCV antiviral therapy. The initial step to recruit potential primary care prescribers of HCV antiviral therapies should be to develop an integrated education program. Recruitment to this program might be most efficient from GPs with a high caseload of patients with HCV.