Cold Vs. Heat After Exercise-Is There a Clear Winner for Muscle Soreness.

Because of the differences in the exercise type, temperature, and timing of the use of cold and heat after exercise in different studies, there is no clear conclusion as to the efficacy of either modality on reducing delayed onset muscle soreness. One hundred subjects at similar fitness levels were examined. They accomplished leg squats for 15 minutes and heat and cold were applied after or 24 hours after exercise using ThermaCare heat or cold wraps. Measurements obtained were strength, the force to passively move the knee, analog visual pain scales, and blood myoglobin. Control subjects lost 24% strength after exercise. Subjects with heat or cold just after exercise only lost 4% strength (p < 0.01). For strength recovery, cold applied after 24 hours was better than heat at 24 hours. Heat or cold applied after exercise was significantly better to prevent elastic tissue damage (p < 0.01), whereas heat and cold immediately after exercise caused no loss in muscle myoglobin and heat or cold after 24 hours showed no less muscle damage from myoglobin than in control subjects. Myoglobin in the control and heat and cold 24-hour groups averaged 135.1% of the baseline data but averaged 106.1% of baseline in the immediate heat and cold groups. For reducing pain, control subjects showed a significant amount of pain the days after exercise. But cold immediately after exercise or 24 hours later was superior to heat in reducing pain. In conclusion, both cold and heat appear to be efficacious in reducing muscle damage after exercise.

A comparison of whole body vibration and moist heat on lower extremity skin temperature and skin blood flow in healthy older individuals.

BACKGROUND: Tissue healing is an intricate process that is regulated by circulation. Heat modalities have been shown to improve skin circulation. Recent research supports that passive vibration increases circulation without risk of burns. Study purpose is to compare and determine effects of short duration vibration, moist heat, and a combination of the two on skin blood flow (SBF) and skin temperature (ST) in elderly, non-diabetic individuals following short-term exposure. MATERIAL/METHODS: Ten subjects, 3 female and 7 male (55-73 years of age), received two interventions over three days: 1--Active vibration, 2--passive vibration, 3--moist heat, 4--moist heat combined with passive vibration (MHPV), 5--a commercial massaging heating pad, and 6--no intervention. SBF and ST were measured using a MOOR Laser Doppler before and after the intervention and the third measurement were taken 10 minutes following. RESULTS: Mean SBF following a ten-minute intervention were significantly different in the combination of moist heat and passive vibration from the control, active vibration, and the commercial massaging heating pad. Compared to baseline measurements, this resulted in mean SBF elevation to 450% (at conclusion of 10 minutes of intervention) and 379% (10 minutes post). MHPV (p=0.02) showed significant changes in ST from the commercial massaging heating pad, passive vibration, and active vibration interventions. CONCLUSIONS: SBF in the lower legs showed greatest increase with MHPV. Interventions should be selected that are low risk while increasing lower extremity skin blood flow.

A comparison of the effect of a variety of thermal and vibratory modalities on skin temperature and blood flow in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Circulation plays an essential role in tissue healing. Moist heat and warm water immersion have been shown to increase skin circulation; however, these heating modalities can cause burns. Recent research has shown that passive vibration can also increase circulation but without the risk of burns. MATERIAL/METHODS: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of short-duration vibration, moist heat, and a combination of the two on skin blood flow (SBF) and skin temperature (ST). Ten (10) subjects, 5 female and 5 male, aged 20-30 years of age, received two interventions a day for 3 consecutive days: Intervention 1--Active vibration only (vibration exercise), Intervention 2--passive vibration only, Intervention 3--moist heat only, Intervention 4--passive vibration combined with moist heat, Intervention 5--a commercial massaging heating pad, and Intervention 6--no intervention, resting in supine only (control). SBF and ST were measured using a laser Doppler imager during the 10 minute intervention and then throughout the nine minute recovery period. RESULTS: The mean skin blood flow following a ten-minute intervention of the combination of passive vibration and moist heat was significantly different from the control, active vibration, and the commercial massaging heating pad. Skin temperature following the ten-minute interventions of moist heat alone and passive vibration alone were both significantly different from the commercial massaging heating pad and active vibration interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of passive vibration and moist heat produced the greatest increase in skin blood flow and the second highest increase in skin blood flow nine minutes post application.

Impact of hydrotherapy on skin blood flow: How much is due to moisture and how much is due to heat?

Hydrotherapy and whirlpool are used to increase skin blood flow and warm tissue. However, recent evidence seems to show that part of the increase in skin blood flow is not due to the warmth itself but due to the moisture content of the heat. Therefore, two series of experiments were accomplished on 10 subjects with an average age of 24.2 +/- 9.7 years and free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Subjects sat in a 37 degrees C hydrotherapy pool under two conditions: one in which a thin membrane protecting their skin from moisture while their arm was submerged in water and the second where their arm was allowed to be exposed to the water for 15 minutes. During this period of time, skin and body temperature were measured as well as skin blood flow by a Laser Doppler Imager. The results of the experiments showed that the vapor barrier blocked any change in skin moisture content during submersion in water, and while skin temperature was the same as during exposure to the water, the blood flow with the arm exposed to water increased from 101.1 +/- 10.4 flux to 224.9 +/- 18.2 flux, whereas blood flow increased to only 118.7 +/- 11.4 flux if the moisture of the water was blocked. Thus, a substantial portion of the increase in skin blood flow associated with warm water therapy is probably associated with moisturizing of the skin rather than the heat itself.

The influence of age and diabetes on the skin blood flow response to local pressure.

BACKGROUND: Previous data has shown that when pressure is applied to the skin of the ankle and on the foot, there is a reactive increase in circulation. In the present investigation, these studies were expanded to look at the response of the hand, back, and foot to applied pressure. MATERIAL/METHODS: Ten young subjects whose average age was 26.5+/-3.3 yrs, 10 older subjects whose average age was 73.3+/-19.7 yrs and 10 people with diabetes whose average age was 60.1+/-5.7 yrs participated in the study. There was no statistical difference in the height or weight of the subjects. Hemoglobin A1c of the group with Diabetes averaged 6.98+/-1.15% with the mean duration of diabetes 13.6+/-9.5 yrs. An infrared laser Doppler flow meter was used to measure circulation on the hand, lower back, and on the bottom of the foot during applications of pressure at 15, 30, 45, and 60 kPa. RESULTS: For all three areas of the body, circulation was significantly less in the group with diabetes than the other two groups (p<0.05). When pressure was applied at 15 kPa, the blood flow to the skin initially decreased, but then increased in the younger subjects and in the older subjects but did not increase in subjects with diabetes for any area of the body. Further, after pressure was released, for any of the four pressures examined here, while the younger subjects showed a pronounced reactive hyperemia, subjects with diabetes showed a diminished hyperemia not proportional to the pressure that was applied. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the normal protective mechanism of a pressure induced hyperemia is absent or diminished in patients with diabetes with more effect on the periphery than on the core area of the body. More importantly, after pressure was applied and released, subjects with diabetes lacked a proportional hyperemia to recovery form the transient ischemia of the pressure.

The influence of ageing on the ability of the skin to dissipate heat.

BACKGROUND: Ageing reduces the resting blood flow to the skin as well as the blood flow response to thermal stimuli. However, the interrelationships between skin thickness, subcutaneous fat, and skin blood flow in determining the heat dissipation characteristics of the skin have not been investigated. MATERIAL/METHODS: In the present investigation, 60 male and female subjects were examined with either a continuous 0.15 watt heat source or a 40 degrees C instantaneous heat source applied to the skin. Data was correlated to skin and subcutaneous fat thickness measured by ultrasound and to skin blood flow measured by a laser Doppler flow meter. RESULTS: The results of the experiments showed a significant negative correlation between age and skin thickness (p<0.0001) and between age and subcutaneous fat thickness (p<0.001). Blood flows in the skin, with the subject in a 24 degrees C, room were 61.8% less in the older subjects compared to the younger subjects. This was due to both a reduction in red cell concentration and red cell velocity. The lower concentration of red cells matches the reduction in skin thickness, implying a loss in the dermal layer of the skin associated with ageing. The skin blood flow response to continuous heat and to a single heat exposure were both reduced in the older subjects (p<0.01). Ageing also caused a slower response of the skin to heat stress. CONCLUSIONS: The results support a reduction in both the resting and post local heat skin blood flows associated with ageing. Some of this may be due to a reduction in dermal layer thickness due to ageing.

Skin heat dissipation: the influence of diabetes, skin thickness, and subcutaneous fat thickness.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that diabetes impairs vascular endothelial function. However, the impact of impaired endothelial function on thermal conductivity of the skin, especially in relation to a constant versus a sudden heat stress, has not been established. Further, there is some evidence that aging reduces skin dermal thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness. Since these are important determinates of heat dissipation by the skin, these parameters also need to be examined in people with diabetes. METHODS: Ninety subjects (30 younger individuals, 30 patients with diabetes, and 30 patients age-matched to the diabetes subjects) participated in two series of experiments to determine (1) the thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer and skin thickness and the skin response to a sudden heat stress and (2) the response to a continuous heat stress on the lower back. Skin thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness were assessed by ultrasound, and skin blood flow was examined by infrared laser Doppler flow meter. RESULTS: People with diabetes had significantly less resting blood flow, blood flow in response to a single or continuous heat load, less subcutaneous fat, and thinner skin than either age-matched controls or younger people (P < 0.05). Subjects with diabetes also had the lowest concentration of red blood cells in their skin, implying a reduction in the number of capillaries in the skin. CONCLUSIONS: Thinning of the skin and probably a reduction in capillaries in the dermal layer contribute to a reduction in the blood flow response to heat. People with diabetes, in particular, have reduced skin heat dissipation because of less resting blood flow and thinner skin than that seen in age-matched controls.