Subacromial temperature profile during bipolar radiofrequency use in shoulder arthroscopy. Comparison of Coblation® vs. VAPR®.

BACKGROUND: The use of bipolar electrodes for arthroscopic procedures carries a theoretical ex vivo risk of inducing burn injuries. Few studies have measured the in vivo temperatures produced by bipolar electrodes during arthroscopy, and their results are conflicting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the temperature profile within the subacromial space during shoulder arthroscopy with two different electrode systems. HYPOTHESIS: The primary hypothesis was that the two electrode systems produced similar temperature variations and peak temperatures. The secondary hypothesis was that neither electrode system produced irrigation-fluid temperatures above the tissue-damage threshold. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative, prospective, single-centre, single-surgeon, single-blind study was conducted to compare the Coblation® system (Smith&Nephew, Andover, MA, USA) and the VAPR® system (DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, MA, USA) in 13 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. A temperature probe inserted into the subacromial space was used to record temperatures at 10-second intervals for 60seconds during continuous radiofrequency application. RESULTS: Mean baseline temperature was 21.4±0.7°C with VAPR® and 23.0±2.2°C with Coblation®. No significant between-group differences were found during the first 40seconds. The mean peak temperature reached after 60seconds was 25.0±1.9°C with VAPR® and 27.9±2.8°C with Coblation® (P<0.05). DISCUSSION: Few studies have compared the in vivo temperatures produced during arthroscopy by different electrode systems. In vivo studies have established that temperature increases can cause tissue damage, particularly to chondrocytes, and that the irrigation flow rate plays a key role in lowering the in vivo temperatures. Our study showed a significant difference between the two electrode systems after 50seconds of use, with lower temperatures with the VAPR®. Nevertheless, neither system increased the irrigation-fluid temperatures above the tissue-damage threshold. Both systems can be used safely, provided the manufacturer instructions are followed and the irrigation system is effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (prospective randomized trial).

Surgical management of Syria's war casualties: experience from a French surgical team deployed in the Zaatari refugee camp (Jordan).

PURPOSE: In August 2012, the Zaatari refugee camp was opened in Jordan under the auspices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. France deployed there a surgical facility to treat victims of war trauma. METHODS: After a phase of intensive care and resuscitation, surgical management meeting the current standards of war surgery was conducted. Then, patients were transferred to a Jordanian civilian hospital or stayed in the Zaatari camp. A retrospective analysis of patient data was performed. RESULTS: From January to March 2013, 95 patients were managed: 85% of patients were male with a median age of 27 years (4-65); 5% of patients were <18 years of age. All patients were Syrian, civilian or members of the "Free Syrian Army." Penetrating trauma accounted for 95% of lesions. A total of 105 surgeries were performed, including: 33 external fixators, 8 laparotomies, 8 nerve repairs, 6 cover flaps, 4 direct arterial repairs, 2 reversed saphenous vein bypass grafts, and 1 amputation. The median length of stay on the wards was 3.71 days; 43% of patients were transferred to Jordanian civilian hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The presence at the Zaatari camp of a surgical facility, which is experienced and specialized in war surgery, is essential, as long as battles are ongoing. Many victims will later require long-term surgical care for the management of the sequelae associated with these traumas.

[Medical and economic impact of a haemostatic sealant on the rate of transfusion after total knee arthroplasty]. / Impact médicoéconomique d'une colle hemostatique sur le taux de transfusion après prothèse totale de genou.

OBJECTIVES: Blood loss reduction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) contributes to the prevention of morbidity and mortality and in the management of health care costs. Fibrin haemostatic sealant have controversial effectiveness in reducing postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Our study evaluated the medical and economic benefits of this treatment with the assumption that it decreases the frequency of blood transfusion after TKA. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Our single-center and randomized study included 60 patients pose unilateral primary TKA for osteoarthritis. Distribution was done in 2 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 patients treated with a dose of 5 mL Evicel®, compared to untreated group 2. Were collected the number of patients transfused. The treatment cost was compared to the sealant cost. RESULTS: Results are not statistically significant. Two patients were transfused in group 1 and 3 in group 2 (P=0.64). The treatment cost for 30 patients is 13,500 €, for a savings of cells packed at 187 €, an additional cost of 13,313 € in group 1. CONCLUSION: The use of fibrin haemostatic sealant in TKA did not induce a significant difference in terms of blood or transfusion savings, with a significant cost. We do not recommend its routine use in TKA.

Surgical management of combined anterior or posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner tears: for what functional results?

INTRODUCTION: Management of combined anterior or posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner tears is still poorly codified. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcome after complete surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 53 patients. Mean age was 29.8 yrs. (15-49). The anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments were involved in respectively 48 and 5 cases. Mean time to surgery was 25.6 months (0-184), and in 10 cases less than 21 days. Nine patients were sedentary workers and 29 non-sedentary (13 laborers). All ligament injuries were treated surgically. Mean follow-up was 49 months (12-146). Last follow-up assessment used IKDC, Lysholm and KOOS scores. RESULTS: At last follow-up, IKDC score graded 14 patients A, 25 B, 8 C and 6 D, versus 0 A, 4 B, 25 C, 22 D and 2 ungraded preoperatively. Mean subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores were respectively 72.8 (11.5-100) and 77.5 (37-100). Mean KOOS scores (pain, symptoms, daily life, sports, quality of life) were respectively 78 (3-100), 70 (25-100), 88 (47-100), 53 (0-100) and 50 (0-100). Posterolateral laxity was corrected in all but two cases. All sedentary workers and 86.7% of non-sedentary workers could return to work. The job had to be changed in 10% of cases overall, but in 25% of cases for laborers. DISCUSSION: The present results are comparable with those of the literature. The strategy of combined surgical treatment showed functional efficacy, usually associated with return to work except for some laborers. There was a non-significant trend in favor of acute-phase ligament reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective series).

Management of combined anterior or posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injuries: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Combined injuries to the posterolateral corner and cruciate ligaments are uncommon. The heterogeneity of injury patterns in many studies complicates the assessment of outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognosis and functional outcomes after surgery for combined injuries to the posterolateral corner and to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature for articles reporting outcomes 1 year or more after surgery for combined injuries to the posterolateral corner and ACL (n=4) or PCL (n=9). Patients with bicruciate injuries were not studied. RESULTS: Overall, 65% of patients were IKDC A or B after surgery. The mean Lysholm score improved from 67 to 90. Mean time to surgery was 4.43 months in the group with ACL tears and 18.4 months in the group with PCL tears, and mean follow-up was 34.4 and 40.7 months in these two groups, respectively. In the groups with ACL and PCL tears, the proportions of patients classified as IKDC A or B at last follow-up were 81.6% and 81.0%, respectively, whereas 88% and 99% of patients, respectively, were IKDC grade C or D before surgery. The mean Lysholm score improved from 77 to 92 in the group with ACL tears and from 65 to 89 in the group with PCL tears. Improvements in laxity ranged from 28% to 79% in the group with PCL tears. DISCUSSION: Most of the articles selected for our review provided level III or IV evidence. Functional outcomes were satisfactory but less good than those reported after surgical reconstruction of isolated cruciate ligament tears. Full reconstruction seems the best strategy in patients with combined ACL/posterolateral corner injuries. Outcomes were also good but more variable in the group with PCL/posterolateral corner injuries. The time to surgery, which reflected the time to diagnosis, was shorter in patients with ACL than with PCL tears in addition to the posterolateral corner injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (systematic literature review).