Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 140(1): 25-31, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21724083

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare galvanic currents generated by different combinations of commonly used brackets and archwires. METHODS: As-received stainless steel, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium wires were coupled to stainless steel and titanium brackets in an artificial saliva medium. The galvanic current and amount of charge transferred for each pair were monitored with a zero resistance ammeter for 10 hours. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference in charge and galvanic currents when factored for type of bracket (P <0.001), but no significant difference between them when factored by type of wire (P >0.05). Specifically, a brazed stainless steel bracket was significantly greater in charge transferred and 10-hour galvanic current than metal injection molded stainless steel and titanium brackets (P <0.001), which were not different from each other (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The method of bracket manufacturing might be of equal or more relevance to galvanic corrosion susceptibility than bracket composition.


Assuntos
Ligas Dentárias , Eletrogalvanismo Intrabucal , Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico , Braquetes Ortodônticos , Fios Ortodônticos , Análise de Variância , Corrosão , Condutividade Elétrica , Teste de Materiais , Níquel , Potenciometria , Saliva Artificial , Aço Inoxidável , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Titânio
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...