Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ ; 348: g3730, 2014 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24948695

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of rapid diagnostic tests on the diagnostic accuracy and treatment of malaria and non-severe fever in an Asian setting. DESIGN: Patient randomised trial in primary level clinics. SETTING: Two areas of Afghanistan where Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum are endemic; one area with moderate transmission (eastern region) and one with low transmission (northern region). PARTICIPANTS: 5794 patients of all ages with suspected malaria enrolled by 80 clinicians in 22 clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests were compared with clinical diagnosis where no parasite diagnostic test was available, longer established field microscopy, and recently introduced microscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients appropriately treated with an antimalarial, defined as patients with P vivax who received chloroquine, patients with P falciparum who received artemisinin based combination therapy, and patients with no malaria parasites who did not receive an antimalarial. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic test accuracy and the proportion of patients negative for malaria who received antibiotics and antimalarials. RESULTS: In the low transmission area, comparing rapid diagnostic tests with clinical diagnosis, 65% (212/325) versus 12% (40/321) of febrile patients were appropriately treated for malaria (adjusted odds ratio 92.7, 95% confidence interval 12.4 to 694.1, P<0.001). The proportion of patients who were negative for malaria and received an antibiotic was 57% (185/325) in the rapid diagnostic test arm compared with 14% (46/321) in the clinical diagnosis arm (16.9, 3.8 to 75.4, P<0.001). In the comparison of rapid diagnostic test with microscopy in the moderate transmission area, 83.6% (1696/2028) versus 76.3% (1512/1983) of patients were appropriately treated for malaria (1.70, 1.30 to 2.23, P<0.001). A higher proportion of P falciparum cases received appropriate treatment with artemisinin based combination therapy when malaria was diagnosed by rapid diagnostic test (82%, 58/71 v 32%, 24/76; 9.2, 3.88 to 21.66, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In South and central Asian regions of low to moderate malaria transmission where clinics lack capacity for diagnosis with rapid diagnostic tests or microscopy, the introduction of the tests should be considered to improve clinical care, reduce the overuse of antimalarials, and improve disease surveillance.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Malária Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malária Vivax/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Afeganistão , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Malária Vivax/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Microscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parasitologia/métodos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Tamanho da Amostra , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMJ ; 345: e4389, 2012 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22833603

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of malaria diagnosis and treatment at primary level clinics in Afghanistan. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: 22 clinics in two Afghan provinces, one in the north (adjoining Tajikistan) and one in the east (adjoining Pakistan); areas with seasonal transmission of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum. PARTICIPANTS: 2357 patients of all ages enrolled if clinicians suspected malaria. INTERVENTIONS: Established (>5 years) microscopy (12 clinics in east Afghanistan), newly established microscopy (five clinics in north Afghanistan), and no laboratory (five clinics in north Afghanistan). All clinics used the national malaria treatment guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients positive and negative for malaria who received a malaria drug; sensitivity and specificity of clinic based diagnosis; prescriber's response to the result of the clinic slide; and proportion of patients positive and negative for malaria who were prescribed antibiotics. Outcomes were measured against a double read reference blood slide. RESULTS: In health centres using clinical diagnosis, although 413 of 414 patients were negative by the reference slide, 412 (99%) received a malaria drug and 47 (11%) received an antibiotic. In clinics using new microscopy, 37% (75/202) of patients who were negative by the reference slide received a malaria drug and 60% (103/202) received an antibiotic. In clinics using established microscopy, 50.8% (645/1269) of patients who were negative by the reference slide received a malaria drug and 27.0% (342/1269) received an antibiotic. Among the patients who tested positive for malaria, 94% (443/472) correctly received a malaria drug but only 1 of 6 cases of falciparum malaria was detected and appropriately treated. The specificity of established and new microscopy was 72.9% and 79.9%, respectively. In response to negative clinic slide results, malaria drugs were prescribed to 270/905 (28.8%) and 32/154 (21%) and antibiotics to 347/930 (37.3%) and 99/154 (64%) patients in established and new microscopy arms, respectively. Nurses were less likely to misprescribe than doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a much lower incidence of malaria in Afghanistan than in Africa, fever was substantially misdiagnosed as malaria in this south Asian setting. Inaccuracy was attributable to false positive laboratory diagnoses of malaria and the clinicians' disregard of negative slide results. Rare but potentially fatal cases of falciparum malaria were not detected, emphasising the potential role of rapid diagnostic tests. Microscopy increased the proportion of patients treated with antibiotics producing a trade-off between overtreatment with malaria drugs and probable overtreatment with antibiotics.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Malária/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Afeganistão/epidemiologia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Erros de Diagnóstico/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Febre/diagnóstico , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária/epidemiologia , Masculino , Microscopia/normas , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Plasmodium vivax/isolamento & purificação , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...