Systemic Reactions to Skin Prick Test with Food Allergens in Children.

OBJECTIVE: Although skin prick tests (SPTs) are generally considered safe, limited studies have specifically evaluated reactions related to SPTs with all allergens. In contrast to these studies, our aim is to exclusively evaluate systemic reaction (SR) occurrences with food allergens during SPTs in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent skin prick and/or prick-to-prick (PtoP) tests with food allergens at our clinic between January 2010 and January 2020 were included in the study. The occurrence of SR during SPTs was evaluated based on patient records. RESULTS: The study included 1852 patients, with 57% males and a median age of 31 months (1-210). Skin tests were most commonly conducted for the indication of atopic dermatitis (29.3%). During the study, 11.2% had repeat SPTs for tolerance and a new allergy diagnosis. No local reactions or SRs occurred during SPTs. Among those with PtoP tests, 3 patients (0.16%) experienced SRs-1 had anaphylaxis (0.05%), the rest had angioedema. Legumes and sea bass caused these reactions. In patients with severe index reactions and those who underwent PtoP testing, SR development was significantly higher (P < .001 for both), and anaphylaxis occurrence was significantly higher among those undergoing PtoP testing compared to prick testing alone (P = .03). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of both SR and anaphylaxis due to SPT with food allergens was found to be quite low in children. However, it is important to consider the possibility of SR development before conducting SPT with food allergens, especially in patients who will undergo the PtoP test and those with severe index reactions. Cite this article as: Karkin G, Ertoy Karagol HI, Polat Terece S, Köken G, Yapar D, Bakirtas A. Systemic reactions to skin prick test with food allergens in children. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59(1):54-59.

Is the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score v2.0 reliable for telemedicine?

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease. Telemedicine is a healthcare technology used when a patient is separated by distance. The reliability of the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score, version 2.0 (PEESS v2.0) for telemedicine applications, has not been studied yet. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reliability of PEESS v2.0 for telemedicine. METHODS: We sent a telesurvey using questionnaires via electronic telecommunication as the telemedicine method. Children with EoE and their parents were asked to complete PEESS v2.0 with the telesurvey method (unsynchronized with the physician) and attend in-person visits one week apart. Intraclass correlation (ICC), Wilcoxon, and Bland-Altman tests were used as reliability analyses. Reliability was defined as a strong agreement between the measurements in ICC ≥ 0.8 and a p-value of ≤0.05 and no statistically significant difference between the scores of the two methods in the Wilcoxon and Bland-Altman analyses, i.e. a p-value of >0.05. RESULTS: The total scores of children and parents were higher in in-person visits than in the telesurvey (Wilcoxon tests, p ≤ 0.05). Bland- Altman analysis showed that the mean difference in total scores between the two methods was significant for both children and parents (p ≤ 0.05). ICC levels for the children and parent scores for the entire group ranged from 0.595 to 0.763 (moderate agreement). DISCUSSION: Unsynchronized telesurvey use of PEESS v2.0 is unreliable both for children and parents. We suggest testing the reliability of chosen telemedicine methods before using them in clinical and research practice.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term treatment compliance and disease control in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: No long-term data exists on asthma treatment compliances (ATC), exacerbations (AE), and control (AC) during the COVID-19 pandemic in children. This study aimed to evaluate ATC, AE, AC and the related factors among children with persistent asthma (PA) within the first year of the pandemic Methods. Children aged 6-18 years with PA who were under regular inhaled corticosteroid treatment for at least a year prior to the first COVID-19 case in Türkiye were included. Data on AE and AC were collected from medical files. Factors affecting ATC and AC as well as COVID-19 history were assessed by means of a questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 247 cases. COVID-19 was detected in 14.5% of them. In the first year of the pandemic, ATC decreased to 56.7% and the most common reason was the absence of asthma symptoms. There was a significant improvement in AC (p < 0.001). The number of upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and AE were significantly decreased during the first year of the pandemic (p < 0.001). COVID-19 infection, smoking in the household, school attendance, a family member working outside the home, house dust mite sensitization or allergic rhinitis had no significant effect on AC (p > 0.05). Regression analysis determined that children who did not have any URTI had 2.4 times better AC compared to those who had (p= 0.02; %95 CI: 1.1-5.4). CONCLUSIONS: Although ATC decreased significantly in the long-term in the first year of the pandemic, significant improvement was observed in AE and AC compared to the previous year, which was related only to not having URTI.

Food-induced immediate response of the esophagus in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Food-induced immediate response of the esophagus (FIRE) is a new phenomenon that has been described in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients. It is suspected when unpleasant symptoms occur suddenly on contact of the triggering food with the esophageal surface and recur with repeated exposures. It can often be mistaken for pollen-food allergy syndrome (PFAS) and solid food dysphagia. Data on FIRE is limited to one survey study and case reports, and there are no screening studies conducted on either adults or children with EoE. In this study, we aimed to screen children aged ≥7 years old with EoE for FIRE. METHODS: Demographic data were collected from medical records. A questionnaire about FIRE was applied to all participants. Skin prick tests were done on suspected patients to identify the triggering foods. FIRE is defined as suitable clinical symptoms with suspected food allergen exposure. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (74.4% male, median age: 13.5 years) were included. Unpleasant and recurrent symptoms distinct from dysphagia with specific foods were reported in 16.7% of the patients, all of whom had concomitant allergic rhinitis (AR). The symptoms described by almost all patients were oropharyngeal itching and tingling (PFAS: 15.3%) excluding only one patient reporting retrosternal narrowing and pressure after specific food consumption (FIRE: 1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although definitive conclusions regarding the true prevalence of FIRE cannot be made, it does not seem to be common as PFAS. However, it deserves questioning particularly in the presence of concurrent AR and/or PFAS in children with EoE.

A novel pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptoms and Adaptive Behavior Scale for different ages: GaziESAS v2.0.

BACKGROUND: High-quality scales (HQS) suitable that measure symptoms and adaptive behaviors (AB) with proven validity and reliability are needed for different age groups of children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). OBJECTIVE: To develop a high-quality pediatric EoE symptoms and AB scale for different age groups. METHODS: Children (7-11 years), teens (12-18 years), and parents of 2-18-year-old children with EoE were included. A HQS should have encompassed: the identification of domain and item generation; content validity (CnV) and field test for construct validity (CsV) and reliability. Convergent validity (CgV) was examined for CsV. Correlations between the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score, version 2.0 (PEESS v2.0) and Gazi University Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptoms and Adaptive Behavior Scale (GaziESAS) version 2.0 (v2.0) were examined for CgV. Reliability was determined through internal consistency (Cronbach-α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: ICC). RESULTS: Nineteen children, 42 teens, and 82 parents completed the study. GaziESAS v2.0 was composed of 20 items with two main domains: symptoms (subdomains: dysphagia and nondysphagia) and AB. CnV indexes were excellent for all items. The CgV varied from good to excellent correlation (r = 0.6 to r = 0.9). GaziESAS v2.0 showed good reliability (Cronbach-α >0.7 and ICC >0.6). CONCLUSION: GaziESAS v2.0 is the first pediatric HQS that measures the frequency of symptoms and AB in EoE within the last month with separate forms for children, teens, and parents.

Long-Term Experience with Anaphylaxis and Desensitization to Alglucosidase Alfa in Pompe Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pompe disease (PD) is an inherited lysosomal storage disease that progresses with glycogen accumulation in many tissues, due to the deficiency of the acid-alpha glucosidase enzyme. Recombinant alglucosidase alfa (rhGAA) is the only disease-specific treatment option, in the form of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Anaphylaxis can develop with rhGAA. There is no study evaluating anaphylaxis and its management in PD in the long term. We aimed to evaluate the development of anaphylaxis and rapid drug desensitization (RDD) with rhGAA in children with PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All children diagnosed and followed up in our institution with PD over 12 years between January 2009 and September 2021 were evaluated for development of anaphylaxis and RDD with rhGAA from medical records. RESULTS: Fourteen patients, 64% of whom were female and diagnosed with PD (1 juvenile, 13 infantile types) during the study period included in the study. The median age at diagnosis was 3.2 months (1-40 months). The median follow-up time of the patients was 20 months (1-129 months). Thirteen patients were given rhGAA, one died before ERT. Four (30.8%) patients developed moderate to severe anaphylaxis, and RDD was applied with rhGAA. A total of 390 RDDs have been performed so far without any serious breakthrough reactions during all RDDs. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis with rhGAA is not rare and RDD with rhGAA is safe and effective in the long term.

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Children with Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Dysphagia is the most troublesome symptom of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This study aimed to investigate oropharyngeal dysphagia in children with EoE and possible related factors. Children with a definite diagnosis of EoE were included in the study. Medical and feeding histories were recorded. A disease control level was determined for each child. An oral structure examination, the Turkish version of the Mastication and Observation Evaluation (T-MOE), the Pediatric version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (PEDI-EAT-10) and the 3-oz water swallow test were applied in screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Fifty-two children participated in the study. Oropharyngeal dysphagia took the form of abnormal swallowing (PEDI-EAT-10 score ≥ 4) and increased aspiration risk (PEDI- EAT-10 score ≥ 13) in 51.9% and 25.0% of the children, respectively. Seven children failed the 3-oz water swallow test. Abnormal swallowing and aspiration risk were significantly higher in children with prolonged mealtimes, impaired chewing function, and uncontrolled disease (p < 0.05). Chewing function was the most important risk factor for abnormal swallowing and increased aspiration (R2 = 0.36, R2 = 0.52, p < 0.001, respectively). Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common in children with EoE and associated with increased aspiration risk in a subpopulation. Uncontrolled disease, prolonged mealtimes, and impaired chewing function may provide clues for oropharyngeal dysphagia in EoE.

Cyclopentolate eye drops-induced anaphylaxis in an infant.

BACKGROUND: Cyclopentolate is frequently used as a mydriatic agent during ophthalmological examinations in childhood and hypersensitivity reactions associated with this drug are rare. We aim to report an infant who experienced anaphylaxis due to cyclopentolate eye drops. CASE: A nine-month-old girl, who was being followed up with a diagnosis of retinoblastoma, presented for consultation for urticaria, cough, stridor, and dyspnea that developed after the administration of topical cyclopentolate to the eyes. The patient was diagnosed with anaphylaxis and treated with adrenaline. During the follow-up, tropicamide was used safely as an alternative drug. CONCLUSIONS: In children, hypersensitivity reactions due to cyclopentolate are very rare. Only four pediatric patients were reported in the literature to have developed an allergic reaction after the administration of cyclopentolate eye drops. We present here the youngest patient who developed anaphylaxis with cyclopentolate eye drops. Anaphylaxis due to cyclopentolate should be kept in mind, rapidly recognized, and treated when a reaction develops.

Biologicals in childhood severe asthma: the European PERMEABLE survey on the status quo.

INTRODUCTION: Severe asthma is a rare disease in children, for which three biologicals, anti-immunoglobulin E, anti-interleukin-5 and anti-IL4RA antibodies, are available in European countries. While global guidelines exist on who should receive biologicals, knowledge is lacking on how those guidelines are implemented in real life and which unmet needs exist in the field. In this survey, we aimed to investigate the status quo and identify open questions in biological therapy of childhood asthma across Europe. METHODS: Structured interviews regarding experience with biologicals, regulations on access to the different treatment options, drug selection, therapy success and discontinuation of therapy were performed. Content analysis was used to analyse data. RESULTS: We interviewed 37 experts from 25 European countries and Turkey and found a considerable range in the number of children treated with biologicals per centre. All participating countries provide public access to at least one biological. Most countries allow different medical disciplines to prescribe biologicals to children with asthma, and only a few restrict therapy to specialised centres. We observed significant variation in the time point at which treatment success is assessed, in therapy duration and in the success rate of discontinuation. Most participating centres intend to apply a personalised medicine approach in the future to match patients a priori to available biologicals. CONCLUSION: Substantial differences exist in the management of childhood severe asthma across Europe, and the need for further studies on biomarkers supporting selection of biologicals, on criteria to assess therapy response and on how/when to end therapy in stable patients is evident.

Reliability and Validity Study of Turkish Version of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Scores® (Tr-PEESS v2.0) Led to Development of a New Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Scale: GaziESAS.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There has been no valid and reliable Turkish scale that measures symptoms in children with eosinohilic esophagitis (EoE). The aim of the study is test the validity and reliability of Turkish version of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Scores® (Tr-PEESS v2.0) Materials and Methods: Relevant forms of Tr-PEESS v2.0 were applied to 2-18 years old children with EoE and to their parents. KINDL QoL patient and parent questionnaires and GaziESAS scale which was developed in this study were used to test convergent validity of Tr-PEESS v2.0. Discriminant validity was evaluated among three EoE treatment groups: under treatment, off treatment due to remission and uncompliant with treatment. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and item analysis. RESULTS: Fiftytwo children/teens (mean age 130.2±60.3 months) and 84 parents were interviewed twice one week apart. Mean duration of EoE was 47.2±35.6 months. Tr-PEESS v2.0 reports correlated with GaziESAS (range,0.361-0.855) and KINDL QoL questionnaires (range,-0.316-0.413). Parent report of Tr-PESS v2.0 discriminated children uncompliant with treatment from the ones off treatment and undertreatment. Cronbach's α values and intraclass correlation coeffcients (ICC) values of Tr-PEESS v2.0 ranged from 0.614 to 0. 895 and 0.646 to 0.910, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tr-PEESS v2.0 is a valid and reliable tool to use in Turkish children. GaziESAS is a new parent-proxy pediatric EoE scale with additional adaptive behaviour domain that passed scale developmental stages successfully for Turkish children with EoE.

Healthcare workers` knowledge level regarding anaphylaxis and usage of epinephrine auto-injectors.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate practices in diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in parallel with an increase in its prevalence may cause serious public health problems today. This is the first study aiming to assess the theoretical knowledge of professional and non-professional healthcare workers from different lines of the healthcare service chain about anaphylaxis management, and their practice approaches for epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) together. METHODS: The study included 697 participants comprising physicians, dentists, pharmacists, and school staff. In face-to-face interviews, each participant was asked to fill out the questionnaire forms prepared for assessing their demographic characteristics, experience with a case of anaphylaxis and EAI and theoretical knowledge about the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, and to demonstrate how to use EAI in practice with trainer device. RESULTS: The rates of 391 physicians, 98 dentists, 102 pharmacists and 105 school staff of knowing the diagnosis criteria of anaphylaxis were 47.6%, 31.6%, 31.1%, 19%, and knowing the first and life-saving treatment of anaphylaxis were 87.2%, 79.6%, 47.6%, 15.2%, respectively. Predictors that affected physicians in knowing the first and life-saving treatment of anaphylaxis were having experience with EAIs [OR:5.5, (%95CI:1.330-23.351, p=0.015)] and a case of anaphylaxis [OR:2.4, (%95CI:1.442-4.020, p=0.001)], and knowing the administration route of epinephrine correctly [OR:1.9, (%95CI:1.191-3.314, p=0.008)]. 31.1% of the participants demonstrated the EAI usage correctly. The EAI usage steps with the most errors were `Place the appropriate injection tip into outer thigh/Press the trigger so it `clicks`` and `Turn the trigger to arrow direction` (60.3% and 34.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers` knowledge level regarding anaphylaxis management and ability to use EAIs correctly are not adequate. That most errors were made in the same steps of EAI usage indicates that the industry should continue to strive for developing the ideal life-saving device.

Anaphylaxis to levetiracetam in an adolescent: a very rare occurence.

BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are among the most common causes of severe delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms(DRESS) in children. These reactions are more commonly seen with aromatic AEDs such as phenytoin and carbamazepine than the non-aromatic or new generation AEDs. However immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions such as urticaria/angioedema, anaphylaxis are very rare with AEDs. CASE: Levetiracetam is an increasingly used new non-aromatic antiepileptic drug and reported to have a better safety profile in daily practice. We present the first adolescent case who developed an anaphylactic reaction with intravenous levetiracetam, not reported in this age group before in the literature. CONCLUSION: Hypersensitivity reactions in the form of anaphylaxis can be rarely observed with new generation AEDs. Therefore, when any antiepileptic drug is started on any patient, immediate type serious reactions such as anaphylaxis should be kept in mind, not only focusing on delayed reactions such as SJS, TEN,or DRESS.

New Perspectives in the Management of Mild to Moderate Asthma in Children.

Mild to moderate asthma makes up the greatest proportion of all asthma severities in childhood. Children who are treated with steps 1-2 are defined as having mild asthma and step 3 as having moderate asthma, according to the guidelines. Although many studies focused on the management of severe asthma over the last decade, there have also been important changes and improvements in the management of mild to moderate asthma. In this article, new perspectives in the management of children with mild to moderate asthma will be reviewed and compared according to the two major guidelines.

Primary Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases Beyond Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children.

OBJECTIVES: There are many unknowns about primary eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) in childhood. The aim of this study is to provide data about the frequency, management, control level, and prognosis of well documented primary EGID in childhood. METHODS: This study was conducted in children who underwent endoscopy and/or colonoscopy at a single center over 10-year period up to August 2018. Primary EGID was diagnosed after exclusion of secondary EGID and classified as eosinophilic gastritis (EG), eosinophilic enteritis (EE), eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE: eosinophilic gastritis with eosinophilic enteritis) and eosinophilic colitis (EC) according to histopathological evaluation. The pathological number of eosinophil counts were accepted as >30 hpf for gastric mucosa in 5 hpf area, ≥20/hpf for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal mucosa, >50/hpf for right colonic mucosa, >35/hpf for transverse colonic mucosa, and >25/hpf for left colonic mucosa. Presenting symptoms, signs, management, follow-up, disease control level, and remission were analyzed. Remission is defined if the patient is controlled with all clinical, endoscopic/colonoscopic, and histopathologic parameters without any treatments or diet for at least a year. RESULTS: During the study period, 7457 biopsies were taken in 8262 endoscopy and/or colonoscopy procedures. Primary and secondary EGID frequencies were found 0.23% (n = 17 patients) and 0.1% (n =8 patients) per procedure with biopsy in children, respectively. Endoscopy/colonoscopy procedures were not able to performed in 9 patients because of short follow-up period (n = 6) or patients leaving follow-up (n = 3). Nine of the primary EGID patients had esophageal eosinophilia (EsE) at the time of diagnosis, 5 of them were previously managed as EoE. The median follow-up period of primary EGID patients excluding the ones without a control endoscopy/colonoscopy procedure was 3.35 years (min-max: 1.1-9.0 years). Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were the most frequently used treatment alone or in combination with diet, systemic and/or topical corticosteroids. Disease control was evaluated in 8 of 17 patients and it was uncontrolled in 4, partially controlled in 1, and controlled in 3 patients. Remission was achieved in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of primary EGID beyond eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children is low. It may be difficult to achieve control in children with primary EGID in the long-term follow-up.

Perioperative Severe Anaphylaxis to Paracetamol in a Child.

The data on perioperative anaphylaxis (PA) in children is limited and usually reported with neuromuscular blocking agents and antibiotics. However we present a first pediatric case who developed PA with paracetamol unlike the literature.

Toward clinically applicable biomarkers for asthma: An EAACI position paper.

Inflammation, structural, and functional abnormalities within the airways are key features of asthma. Although these processes are well documented, their expression varies across the heterogeneous spectrum of asthma. Type 2 inflammatory responses are characterized by increased levels of eosinophils, FeNO, and type 2 cytokines in blood and/or airways. Presently, type 2 asthma is the best-defined endotype, typically found in patients with allergic asthma, but surprisingly also in nonallergic patients with (severe) asthma. The etiology of asthma with non-type 2 inflammation is less clear. During the past decade, targeted therapies, including biologicals and small molecules, have been increasingly integrated into treatment strategies of severe asthma. These treatments block specific inflammatory pathways or single mediators. Single or composite biomarkers help to identify patients who will benefit from these treatments. So far, only a few inflammatory biomarkers have been validated for clinical application. The European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology Task Force on Biomarkers in Asthma was initiated to review different biomarker sampling methods and to investigate clinical applicability of new and existing inflammatory biomarkers (point-of-care) to support diagnosis, targeted treatment, and monitoring of severe asthma. Subsequently, we discuss existing and novel targeted therapies for asthma as well as applicable biomarkers.

Diagnosis and management of NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (N-ERD)-a EAACI position paper.

NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is a chronic eosinophilic, inflammatory disorder of the respiratory tract occurring in patients with asthma and/or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), symptoms of which are exacerbated by NSAIDs, including aspirin. Despite some progress in understanding of the pathophysiology of the syndrome, which affects 1/10 of patients with asthma and rhinosinusitis, it remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In order to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of N-ERD, a panel of international experts was called by the EAACI Asthma Section. The document summarizes current knowledge on the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of N-ERD pointing at significant heterogeneity of this syndrome. Critically evaluating the usefulness of diagnostic tools available, the paper offers practical algorithm for the diagnosis of N-ERD. Recommendations for the most effective management of a patient with N-ERD stressing the potential high morbidity and severity of the underlying asthma and rhinosinusitis are discussed and proposed. Newly described sub-phenotypes and emerging sub-endotypes of N-ERD are potentially relevant for new and more specific (eg, biological) treatment modalities. Finally, the document defines major gaps in our knowledge on N-ERD and unmet needs, which should be addressed in the future.

Comparison of practical application steps of the previously used adrenaline auto injector in Turkey (EpiPen) and the currently available adrenaline auto injector (Penepin): a multi-center study.

AIM: It has been shown by a great number of studies that the correct use of adrenaline auto injectors prescribed to patients with anaphylaxis is associated with the design of the auto injector, in addition to training. The aim of this study was to compare the skills of adults in using two different auto injectors prescribed to patients with anaphylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Parents of patients aged between 1 and 18 years who referred to allergy outpatients were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 630 volunteers from nine centers were included in the study. Four hundred fifty-seven (72.5%) of the participants were females and 235 (37.3%) were undergraduates. The rate of showing all the steps of auto injector trainers correctly by the participants was found as (60.2%) (n=379) for EpiPen and 42.9% (n=270) for Penepin (p<0.001). The most frequent mistake with both auto injector trainers was the step of "place appropriate injection tip into outer thigh/press the trigger so it clicks." When the preferences of the volunteers were asked after training and application, 527 (83.7%) chose EpiPen, stating that it was easier and simpler to use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the correct usage rates of both adrenaline auto injectors were much lower than expected and there could be mistakes in the application of both. It could be appropriate to make improvements in the design of Penepin, which is still the only available adrenaline auto injector in Turkey, such that its application steps will be simpler and quicker.

Effects of inspiratory muscle training in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory muscle weakness and its relation to other impairments in children with cerebral palsy (CP) have been shown in the latest studies. The effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in this population have not been comprehensively investigated so far. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of IMT on trunk control, pulmonary functions, respiratory muscle strength, daily living activities, exercise capacity and quality of life in children with CP. METHODS: This was a prospective-randomized controlled trial. Twenty-five children with CP were randomly assigned to the treatment (n=13) or the control group (n=12). The treatment group received IMT at 30% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and the control group received sham therapy (5% of MIP) for 6 weeks. Also, both groups received routine conventional physical therapy (stretching, strengthening, and functional exercises, etc.) for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was trunk control. Secondary outcome measures were pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, daily living activities, functional exercise capacity and quality of life. RESULTS: The treatment group had better outcome for trunk control (3.87, 95% CI 3.72-4.02). Also, respiratory muscle strength, daily living activities, functional exercise capacity and quality of life were significantly improved in the treatment group compared with controls. No improvements were observed in the pulmonary function test scores between the groups. CONCLUSION: Inspiratory muscle training improves trunk control, respiratory muscle strength, daily living activities, functional exercise capacity and quality of life in children with CP and it can be included in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs.

Physicians' preference for controller medication in mild persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Although the asthma guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids(ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonists-(LTRAs) for the treatment of mild persistent asthma, factors governing the physicians' preference are unknown. We aimed to investigate the preference of physicians for the controller medication and the factors governing their choice. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire composed of 16 questions that aimed to determine the preference of the physicians for the first choice controller medication in mild persistent asthma and physician and patient related factors that may be associated with this selection was e-mailed to the members of the Turkish National Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and distributed to participants in the 21st congress. RESULTS: Of the 670 questionnaires, there were 51% participants and 336 of them were complete enough to be included in the analysis. Low dose ICS was preferred as the first choice controller medication for mild persistent asthma by 84.5% of the physicians. The reasons for physicians' preference were different for ICS and LTRA. In the logistic regression analysis, use of asthma guidelines (OR:3.5, 95%CI:1.3-9.3, p = 0.01), alignment in guidelines (OR:2.9, 95%CI:1.4-5.8, p = 0.002) and the opinion that it is a more effective (OR:2.3, 95%CI:1.1-4.8, p = 0.02) were independently associated with ICS preference. Being a pediatrician (OR:5.4, 95%CI: 2.7-10.5, p < 0.001) and the opinion that it has better patient compliance (OR:4.4, 95%CI: 1.6-12.0, p = 0.004) were independently associated with LTRA preference. CONCLUSION: Surveyed Turkish physicians, the majority of whom were specialists, preferred ICS over LTRA as controller medication in mild persistent asthma. Asthma guidelines, training background (pediatrician versus not) and perceived efficacy and patient compliance appeared to influence their preferences.