Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 104(7): 1025-1030, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30249375

RESUMO

The authors present a new minimally invasive posterior thoracic and upper lumbar spinal approach, using midline-staged incision with bilateral dissection via the natural muscular cleavage plane between the spinalis and longissimus muscles for pedicle fixation. The aim was to clarify anatomy and compare results between this technique and the conventional paraspinal approach. An anatomic MRI study determined the position of the superficial aponeurosis of the spinalis-longissimus intermuscular cleavage plane with respect to the midline. The surgical procedure is described. A radiological and clinical study evaluated 24 patients divided into two comparative groups, operated on via the medial intermuscular or the paraspinal approach, for isolated A3 and B2 Magerl fracture between T2 and L2, without neurologic involvement. Pain, postoperative complications, reduction quality and esthetic satisfaction were assessed. MRI located the cleavage plane, which was consistently 11.01±0.9mm (range, 9.4-12.3mm) from the midline. In the "medial approach" group, hospital stay was significantly shorter, by 3 days, at 4±1.9 (range, 2-8 days) (p: 0.005); pain on VAS was 2 points lower at postoperative day 1 (2.1±1.4; range,≤1-4; p:0.032), and lower at discharge (0.3±0.6; range, 0-1; p: 0.001). The scar was considered esthetically very satisfactory. This easily performed and reproducible medial intermuscular approach showed low iatrogenesis, significantly improving postoperative course.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Músculos Paraespinais/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Dissecação , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Músculos Paraespinais/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Radiology ; 280(2): 493-9, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26919442

RESUMO

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonographically (US)-guided percutaneous treatment of the trigger finger by releasing the A1 pulley with a 21-gauge needle. Materials and Methods This two-part study was approved by the ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from all patients. The first part consisted of 10 procedures on cadaver digits followed by dissection to analyze the effectiveness of the A1 pulley release and detect any collateral damage to the A2 pulley, interdigital nerves, or underlying flexor tendons. The second part was performed during an 18-month period starting in March 2013. It was a prospective clinical study of 60 procedures performed in 48 patients. Outcomes were evaluated through a clinical examination at day 0 and during a 6-month follow-up visit, where the trigger digit was evaluated clinically and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure, or QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction questionnaires were administered. Results No complications were found during the cadaver study. However, the release was considered "partial" in all fingers. In the clinical study, the trigger finger was completely resolved in 81.7% (49 of 60) of cases immediately after the procedure. Moderate trigger finger persisted in 10 cases, and one thumb pulley could not be released. A US-guided corticosteroid injection was subsequently performed in these 11 cases. At 6-month follow-up, only two cases still had moderate trigger finger and there were no late complications. The mean QuickDASH questionnaire score was 4; all patients said they were satisfied. Conclusion US-guided treatment of the trigger finger by using a 21-gauge needle is feasible in current practice, with minimal complications. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Ortopédicos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Dedo em Gatilho/diagnóstico por imagem , Dedo em Gatilho/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cadáver , Feminino , Dedos/diagnóstico por imagem , Dedos/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...