Fertility treatments and adverse perinatal outcomes in a population-based sampling of births in Florida, Maryland, and Utah: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate perinatal outcomes associated with fertility treatments, including assisted reproductive technology (ART), intrauterine insemination with ovulation stimulation (IUI), and ovulation stimulation alone (OS). DESIGN: Population-representative cross-sectional survey of women with live births, 2004-2008. SETTING: Florida, Maryland, and Utah, USA. SAMPLE: 21 803 women, weighted to represent 1 022 597 women. METHODS: Survey and birth certificate data were analysed with logistic regression models adjusted for age, education, race, income, and parity, using separate models for singletons and all births. We used two referent groups: (1) women who never used fertility treatment and (2) subfertile women conceiving without treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm birth (<37 weeks), very preterm birth (<34 weeks), low birthweight (<2500 g), and very low birthweight (<1500 g). RESULTS: Referent group 1: In singletons, ART was associated with preterm birth (OR 3.28; 95% CI 1.74, 6.20) and low birthweight (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.99, 4.26). OS was also associated with low birthweight (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.19, 2.19). Including all births, treatment was associated with preterm birth and low birthweight: ART (OR 6.21; 95% CI 4.21, 9.16 and OR 6.51; 95% CI 4.85, 8.73); IUI (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.24, 3.56 and OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.54, 3.76); OS (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.01, 1.94 and OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.60, 2.75), respectively. Referent group 2: ART was associated with both outcomes in all births, but not singletons. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth and low birthweight associated with fertility treatments are largely attributable to multiple gestation, but are also related to underlying subfertility. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Preterm birth is associated with subfertility, and with fertility treatments through multiple gestation.

Minimum dose requirements of steroid-dependent asthmatic patients for aerosol beclomethasone and oral prednisone.

In 34 steroid-dependent asthma patients who improved markedly during 2 mo of treatment when progressively larger doses of beclomethasone aerosol were added to their oral prednisone regimen, we subsequently reduced both steroids to ascertain the minimum dose of each needed to prevent recurrence of significant asthmatic disability. After 80 wk of follow-up, 15 patients had successfully terminated oral prednisone; 19 were better controlled with a combination of aerosol plus oral steroid than with either drug alone; all patients previously unable to convert to alternate-day prednisone did so successfully during the combined therapy. The minimum effective maintenance dosage varied greatly among these patients-the median values being 2.5 mg prednisone and 1,200 microgram beclomethasone per day. The latter ranged from 200 to 1,8000 microgram. Only 4 patients were satisfactorily controlled without prednisone on 400 microgram beclomethasone per day or less. Seven needed extra intranasal beclomethasone to help control the nasal polyps which worsened after prednisone withdrawal. Suppression of plasma cortisol levels, apparently attributable to the beclomethasone, persisted in most patients, but on the average this was no worse than before commencing this treatment and valuable clinical improvement accrued. There were no other important complications of the regimen. In most of these patients with severe chronic asthma, optimum control of the disease required combined aerosol-oral therapy and maintenance doses of beclomethasone higher than those usually recommended. In some patients, effective control of chronic asthma by beclomethasone treatment may require acceptance of some persisting suppression of adrenal function as a considered risk.

A graded dose assessment of the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol for severe chronic asthma.

In a 26-wk double-blind controlled study of 34 patients whose asthma had been poorly controlled despite oral steroids, valuable clinical and pulmonary function improvement was derived by adding beclomethasone aerosol to the prednisone regimen. The amount of improvement correlated linearly with beclomethasone dosage over the range 200 to 1,600 microng/day. These patients required relatively high dosage. Success in achieving asymptomatic status was only 26% with the conventional 400 microng/day and 60% at 1,600 microng/day. Oropharyngeal candidiasis was also dose-related but did not prohibit the use of high-dosage beclomethasone. Respiratory infections, physical signs, blood glucose, and electrolytes were unaffected by the drug. A dose-related suppression of cortisol secretion was demonstrated, but about 1/4 of the group had normal plasma cortisol even at 1,600 microng/day plus the oral prednisone. An individualized risk-benefit assessment seems a better basis for choosing an optimal beclomethasone regimen for each patient than adherence to a conventionalized fixed dosage of 400 microng/day. This requires definition of: (1) a specific goal of treatment in the individual patient and the beclomethasone dosage required to achieve it; (2) the adrenocortical functional response of that particular patient to the desired dose of beclomethasone; and (3) the presence and degree of any dose-limiting constraints such as preexisting complications of steroid use.