Aortic valve replacement in patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis and coronary bypass surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess whether there is survival benefit for patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis if they undergo aortic valve replacement at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: From 1985 to 1995 we evaluated all patients at our institution who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and who had the echocardiographic diagnosis of mild (mean gradient <0 mm Hg and/or valve area >1.5 cm(2)) or moderate (mean gradient > or =30 and < or =40 mm Hg and/or valve area >1.0 < or =1.5 cm(2)) aortic stenosis. Using propensity analysis, survival was compared between 129 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery alone and 78 patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery and aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was similar among patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery alone compared with patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery and aortic valve replacement. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year and 8-year survival were better at 90% and 55% for patients who underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery and aortic valve replacement compared with 85% and 39% for patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery alone (P <0.001). This benefit was limited to patients with moderate aortic stenosis (propensity-adjusted relative risk = 0.43; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 0.96; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Concomitant aortic valve replacement at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery for mild or moderate aortic stenosis appears to convey a survival advantage for patients with moderate aortic stenosis but not for those with mild aortic stenosis.

Circular mapping and ablation of the pulmonary vein for treatment of atrial fibrillation: impact of different catheter technologies.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to compare the efficacy and safety of different catheter ablation technologies and of distal versus ostial pulmonary veins (PV) isolation using the circular mapping technique. BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of the PVs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a technical challenge. METHODS: Two hundred eleven patients (163 men; mean age 53 +/- 11 years) with symptomatic AF were included in this study. In the first 21 patients (group 1), distal isolation (> or = 5 mm from the ostium) was achieved targeting veins triggering AF. In the remaining 190 patients (group 2), ostial isolation of all PVs was performed using 4-mm tip (47 patients), 8-mm tip (21 patients), or cooled-tip (122 patients) ablation catheters. RESULTS: Distal isolation was able to eliminate premature atrial contractions (PACs) and AF in six of 21 patients (29%) and 10 of 34 PVs. After a mean follow-up time of 6 +/- 4 months, no patients treated with the 8-mm tip catheter experienced recurrence of AF, whereas 21% (10 of 47 patients) and 15% (18 of 122 patients) of the patients ablated with the 4-mm tip and the cooled-tip ablation catheters experienced recurrence of AF after a mean follow-up of 10 +/- 3 and 4 +/- 2 months, respectively. Significant complications including stroke, tamponade, and severe stenosis occurred in 3.5% (8/211) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter technologies designed to achieve better lesion size appeared to have a positive impact on procedure time, fluoroscopy time, number of lesions, and overall efficacy. Although distal isolation can be achieved with fewer lesions, ostial isolation is required in the majority of patients to eliminate arrhythmogenic PACs and AF.