Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 35(6): 441-444, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27878466

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Identification of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is important in the management of chronic pancreatitis. The 72-h stool for fecal fat estimation (FFE) has long been considered a gold standard indirect test for the diagnosis of PEI. However, the test is cumbersome for both patients and laboratory personnel alike. In this study, we aimed to assess fecal elastase 1 (FE1) as an alternate to FFE for the diagnosis of PEI. METHODS: In all, 87 consecutive patients diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis were included in this study. FFE and FE1 estimation was done for all the patients. For FE1, two cutoffs (<100 and <200 µg) were selected to define pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the two cutoffs were estimated. Kappa statistics was used to assess degree of agreement between both tests. RESULTS: All patients completed the study and were included in the analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value and PABAK (prevalence and bias adjusted kappa) for FE1 <100 µg was 84.9, 47.6, 83.6, 50, and 0.52, respectively. For FE1 <200 µg, it was 90.9, 9.5, 75.95, 25, and 0.43, respectively. CONCLUSION: FE1 is a sensitive test; however, it does not have a good agreement with FFE. FE1 may be used as screening test for PEI in patients with chronic pancreatitis.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/diagnóstico , Fezes/enzimologia , Elastase Pancreática/análise , Adulto , Biomarcadores/análise , Doença Crônica , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/etiologia , Gorduras/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/complicações , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Indian J Med Res ; 100: 70-2, 1994 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7927559

RESUMO

Plasma and renal tissue levels of lipid peroxide and plasma vitamin E were estimated as measures of free radical injury in five renal allograft recipients with untreated and four with unsuccessfully treated acute cellular rejection and compared with 11 control patients with minimal change disease. Plasma lipid peroxide was significantly higher in patients studied before antirejection therapy (13.2 +/- 3.5 nmol/ml; P < 0.01) as well as in those after unsuccessful antirejection treatment (11.7 +/- 0.7 nmol/ml; P < 0.01), compared to controls (5.7 +/- 2.8 nmol/ml). Levels of plasma vitamin E and renal tissue lipid peroxide were similar in both groups, however the latter was significantly raised in patients evaluated prior to antirejection therapy than in those after unsuccessful antirejection therapy (5.1 +/- 1.7 and 3.0 +/- 0.8 nmol/mg protein; P < 0.05). These findings suggest possible free radical mediated injury during renal allograft rejection.


Assuntos
Radicais Livres , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Transplante de Rim , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/sangue , Humanos , Peróxidos Lipídicos/sangue , Masculino , Vitamina E/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...