Vasa previa: clinical presentations, outcomes, and implications for management.

OBJECTIVE: To review experience with diagnosis, clinical associations, and outcomes of vasa previa in a single institution. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all identified vasa previa cases from January 1 1990, to June 30, 2010. RESULTS: Sixty cases of vasa previa were identified (53 singletons, seven twins); 56 cases were diagnosed before delivery. An abnormal cord insertion or abnormal placental location was present in 55 cases. Missed diagnoses were attributed to technical and observer factors. Preterm bleeding was encountered in 25 (42%) case group participants. Seven case group participants required an emergent delivery, with significant neonatal morbidity and mortality. Twin pregnancies had a significantly earlier median age at delivery of 32 weeks of gestation compared with 35 weeks of gestations in singletons (P=.01). The seven twin pregnancies had a 28.6% emergent preterm delivery rate, whereas singletons had a 4.1% rate (P=.07). In 14 case group participants, the membranous fetal vessel was located in the lower uterus and not directly over the cervix. The vessel location was not related to the risk of emergent delivery. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal ultrasound scans of at-risk patients can identify most cases of vasa previa. Preterm bleeding does not usually require immediate delivery. The rate of emergent preterm delivery was low in singleton pregnancies. Twins were delivered, on average, 3 weeks earlier than singletons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Photographic Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (Photo-ROP): study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients.

OBJECTIVE: The Photographic Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (Photo-ROP) sought to evaluate the utility of digital wide-angle photographic fundus screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) as compared to bedside indirect ophthalmoscopy. This article describes the study design and presents baseline characteristics of the subjects. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, masked, Internet-based clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Premature infants <31 weeks postmenstrual age at birth and <1000 g birthweight. INTERVENTIONS: Examinations began at 31 weeks postmenstrual age or 4 weeks postnatal age, whichever was later. Both eyes of all infants were imaged with a panoramic fundus imaging system followed by indirect ophthalmoscopic fundus examination. Images were transmitted via Internet to the Reading Center for interpretation by masked graders. Clinical interpretations based on indirect ophthalmoscopy were recorded for comparison with the Reading Center determinations. Examinations were performed weekly for 10 weeks or until an infant was discharged from the hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of Reading Center image interpretations were compared to clinical impressions based on bedside indirect ophthalmoscopy. RESULTS: Enrollment began in February 2001 and was completed in February 2002. The target number of infants was 50, and 62 were enrolled. Of those enrolled, 51 infants (102 eyes) were considered eligible, and are the subject of this article. Mean postmenstrual age (+/- SD) at time of delivery was 26.80 +/- 1.73 weeks (median = 26.86 weeks, interquartile range [IQR] = 2.43 weeks). Mean postmenstrual age at first examination (+/- SD) was 32.19 +/- 2.86 weeks (median = 31.71 weeks, IQR = 2.29 weeks). Mean birthweight (+/- SD) was 830.51 +/- 219.57 g (median = 817 g, IQR = 225 g). Female infants comprised 49.02% of the patients. Race distribution was as follows: white 45.10%, African or black 39.22%, Hispanic 3.92%, Asian 9.80%, and other races 1.96%. Mean follow-up (+/- SD) was 5.73 +/- 3.22 weeks (median = 6 weeks, IQR = 5, range = [1, 15]). CONCLUSIONS: The Photo-ROP Study Cooperative Group successfully recruited and enrolled at-risk premature infants into a longitudinal, prospective clinical trial comparing two different diagnostic approaches. Technology employed in this study is comparable to that currently available. Design issues for this trial included establishing the information technology infrastructure for an ROP study based on digital imaging, defining the study endpoints, estimating event rates, defining a standardized imaging protocol, and defining standards for interpretation of image quality and clinical findings.

Simplified scoring system for predicting mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop a simplified scoring system based on pre-intervention clinical characteristics to predict in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with variety of complications, including the risk of death. Factors leading to poor outcomes need to be identified. Currently available indexes are cumbersome and therefore seldom used. METHODS: Crude mortality and univariate odds ratios (ORs) for mortality associated with multiple clinical characteristics were calculated for 9,954 patients undergoing PCI at the William Beaumont Hospital during 1996 to 1998. Based on the OR, each factor was assigned a weighted score. Using these scores, a classification was constructed to determine the probability of death after PCI, with classes I through IV representing an increasing probability of procedural mortality. This classification was validated in a separate group of patients. RESULTS: The factors with the highest univariate odds of dying and their scores were: myocardial infarction <14 days = 7; elevated creatinine = 4; multivessel disease = 4; and age >65 years = 3. Classes were created based on the presence of these factors in a given patient. The odds of dying and mortality increased significantly with each class. These results were reproduced in the validation subset. CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural clinical risk factors have a differential influence on the probability of death after PCI. Risk classification based on these factors can be used to accurately predict the procedural outcome. This simple classification can be used by interventionalists to assist in management decisions, to provide an estimate of procedural risk to the patients and relatives, and for quality assurance.