Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors added to nonbiological immunosuppressants vs. nonbiological immunosuppressants alone: a different signal of cancer risk according to the condition. A disproportionality analysis in a nationwide pharmacovigilance database.

We aimed at detecting a signal of an increased risk of cancer in patients treated with TNF inhibitor (TNFi) and nonbiological immunosuppressant (NBIS), compared with NBIS alone for autoimmune diseases. Secondly, we aimed at comparing this risk between the different TNFis. We conducted a disproportionality analysis (case/noncase study) from the French National PharmacoVigilance Database. We selected all the reports of serious adverse drug reactions from 2000 to 2010 in patients treated with NBIS for labeled indications of TNFi. Cases were all the reports of cancer that occurred after a minimal 3-month exposure to NBIS. Noncases were all the other reports. We searched for exposure to TNFi and calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs), stratified by condition and type of cancer and adjusted by age, gender, history of cancer, type of NBIS and year of reporting. Of the 1918 reports included in the study population, 217 were cases (135 solid and 82 blood cancers). A safety signal was found in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (ROR: 5.43, 95% CI[3.52-8.38]) particularly for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) (20.17[2.49-163.36]), and in psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (3.45[1.09-10.92]). No signal was found in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and ankylosing spondylitis, whatever the type of cancer. There was no difference between TNFis. This study puts the argument of an increased risk of cancer (particularly NMSC) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to TNFi and NBIS compared with NBIS alone, but not in IBD and ankylosing spondylitis patients. No signal was detected for melanoma potentially related to the lack of power. The signal seems similar whatever the TNFi.

Is anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay for Rivaroxaban appropriate in clinical practice? Advantages and comparative drawbacks.

INTRODUCTION: No routine monitoring is required with factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban. Yet, its titration must be adapted, and its misuse may lead to increased risk of bleeding; therefore, therapeutic rivaroxaban monitoring might help in specific situations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As asked by clinicians of our medical center, we measured rivaroxaban plasma concentrations in real conditions of use and checked their corresponding prescriptions. Measurement of 112 samples from 94 consecutive patients was performed with a Biophen LRT® anti-Xa chromogenic assay and compared blindly to the HPLC-MSMS "gold standard" method. Rivaroxaban was effectively given to 80 out of 94 patients but a mere 57% through an adequate prescription (within the scope of indications/titration). All chromogenic measurements were over the pre-specified 30ng/ml LOQ, whereas only 98 /114 samples had quantifiable rivaroxaban with HPLC-MSMS (LOQ 1ng/ml). Correlation between the two methods and linear regression were highly significant (p<0.0001). However, chromogenic values (mean 141.6ng/ml[96.6]) overestimated HPLC-MSMS values (119.7ng/ml[79.5]) by 22ng/ml according to Bland-Altman analysis (p<0.001). After re-assessing the chromogenic LOQ at 52ng/ml, 83 quantifiable samples had a mean concentration of 176.9ng/ml as compared to 158.5ng/ml with HPLC-MSMS, with no false positive anymore. CONCLUSIONS: In our medical center, rivaroxaban concentrations could be assessed by a rapid chromogenic method. Its pre-specified LOQ proved too high after being checked "on site" against HPLC-MSMS. Prescriptions for rivaroxaban were not optimal. An overestimated LOQ may impair observance monitoring or predispose patients to either risky thrombolysis or otherwise adjournable surgery in clinical practice.

[Drug Shortage May Have Serious Outcome: the French Exemple of Phenytoine]. / Des ruptures de stock aux conséquences parfois graves : l'exemple de la phénytoïne, à propos de 7 cas.

In 2012, in France, phenytoin sodium was used as a substitute for phenytoin base during a shortage at the dose of 100 mg for 100 mg, according to the French Health Agency recommendations. However, this substitution was problematic because the two specialties were not bioequivalent. We report here the case of a 29-year old woman who presented with severe epilepsy. The substitution of phenytoin base by phenytoin sodium induced an increase of seizure frequency leading to several hospitalizations and sick leave. Phenytoin base was finally available again in 2013 which allowed a reduction of seizure frequency. Six similar cases, including one death, were reported to the French pharmacovigilance system. Drug shortages are increasingly common and can have serious consequences. Reporting the difficulties that drug shortage causes to health authorities is important in order to improve their management and to better support patients.

Are nilotinib-associated vascular adverse events an under-estimated problem?

Vascular adverse events have been reported with nilotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor prescribed for chronic myeloid leukaemia. However, few data specify their incidence, or whether they occur in predisposed patients. Hence, we prospectively studied 30 consecutive patients to assess the frequency of such adverse reactions and determine whether the patients presenting with these adverse events bear predisposing factors. From 3 to 73 months after nilotinib initiation, 10 of the 30 patients experienced vascular events. Three patients of these 10 were devoid of any patent cardiovascular risk factor, except for age. This study points out an occurrence more frequent than expected of vascular adverse events associated with nilotinib (> 30% vs. < 1% in summary of product characteristics), and particularly of vascular events of late onset in patients with no pre-existing risk factors.

Are adverse drug reaction patterns different between romiplostim and eltrombopag? 2009-2013 French PharmacoVigilance assessment.

BACKGROUND: Romiplostim and eltrombopag, the two marketed thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), have distinct binding sites and might have distinct pharmacodynamic mechanisms. The aim of this study was to compare their adverse drug reaction (ADR) patterns. METHODS: We selected in the French PharmacoVigilance Database all ADRs associated with TPO-RAs from TPO-RA marketing until the 31st of December 2013. Medical charts were reviewed. We conducted disproportionality analyses comparing romiplostim exposure in the reports of a given ADR pattern (thrombosis, neurological, cutaneous, gastrointestinal or hematological) to romiplostim exposure in all other TPO-RA-related ADR reports. Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) were adjusted for age and gender. We also compared the number of reports of a given ADR pattern per million daily defined doses (DDDs) dispensed in France during the study period. RESULTS: We described 45 reports (53 ADRs) with romiplostim and 26 reports (37 ADRs) with eltrombopag. There were 19 venous thromboses. At least one other risk factor was present in 83.3% of the cases. Ten (55.6%) patients had been splenectomized previously. There were eight arterial thromboses. Another risk factor was noticed in all cases. There was no signal for an excess risk of thrombosis with romiplostim versus eltrombopag (ROR: 1.45, 95% CI [0.48-4.45]). There was a signal for a higher risk of gastrointestinal ADRs with eltrombopag (ROR: 30.28, 95% CI [3.23-383.86]) and of hematological ADRs with romiplostim (ROR: 14.36, 95% CI [1.73-119.08]). Dispensing data-adjusted comparisons led to similar results. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests different ADR patterns between romiplostim and eltrombopag.

[Sarcoïdosis and anti-TNF: a paradoxical class effect? Analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance system database and literature review]. / Sarcoïdose et anti-TNF : un effet paradoxal de classe? Analyse des cas de la base française de Pharmacovigilance et revue de la littérature.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize the observations of sarcoidosis occurring during anti-TNF blockade collected in the French Pharmacovigilance system database and reported in the literature. RESULTS: Seven cases were reported in the French Pharmacovigilance system database and 39 cases (37 original) have been reported internationally. Monoclonal antibodies (infliximab and adalimumab) and fusion protein (etanercept) are equally involved. Sarcoidosis have been confirmed histologically and occurred predominantly in the rheumatoid arthritis (22) and spondylarthropathy (16). CONCLUSION: The lack of protopathic bias suggests that these paradoxical sarcoidosis occurring during treatment with anti-TNF are a class-effect, as with psoriasis, uveitis, and IBD reported under similar conditions. Their pathogenesis remains unclear.

[Tuberculosis and infliximab treatment. National surveillance from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003]. / Tuberculoses lors de traitements par l'infliximab. Suivi national du ler janvier 2000 au 30 juin 2003.

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of the tuberculosis cases reported in France in patients treated with infliximab since its marketing approval, assessment of the effect of changes in the summary of product characteristics and national guidelines. METHODS: Based on tuberculosis reports from the national post-marketing adverse drug reaction databank of the manufacturer from January 1, 2000 through June 30, 2003, and records from the national multicenter retrospective survey on opportunistic infections with anti-TNFalpha, we analyzed all cases of tuberculosis and the impact of the changes made in December 2000 in the summary of product characteristics and the guidelines on the prevention and management of tuberculosis in patients treated with infliximab published in February 2002. RESULTS: 56 cases of tuberculosis were reported: the median interval before diagnosis was 12 weeks with a median of 3 infusions. The presence of Koch bacilli was confirmed in 32 patients; 29 patients had extrapulmonary or disseminated forms of tuberculosis. The tuberculosis rate among patients treated with infliximab was greater than among the general population and differed significantly by period (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Tuberculosis can occur within the first 12 weeks of treatment with infliximab. Information for practitioners must be continued, together with surveillance of the tuberculosis cases in France.