RESUMO
We present a case of an abdominal aortic aneurysm ruptured into a retroaortic left renal vein. The patient presented with left flank pain, left-sided varicocoele and haematuria. Imaging showed a juxtarenal AAA associated with a retroaortic left renal vein and simultaneous contrast captation of the aneurysm, the vena cava, the left renal vein and the left vena testicularis. After opening of the aneurysm sac, the defect was controlled by digital pressure and closed by suture. The patient underwent a successful abdominal aorto bi-iliac replacement. We discuss prevalence, clinical features and treatment options of this rare condition.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Ruptura Aórtica/complicações , Fístula Arteriovenosa/complicações , Veias Renais/anormalidades , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/terapia , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico , Ruptura Aórtica/terapia , Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico , Fístula Arteriovenosa/terapia , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
The long-term goals of lung cancer surgery include cancer control, survival and quality of life (QoL). In a patient population with a high mortality rate, evaluation and preservation of QoL after treatment is imperative. Lung cancer patients already have a significant lower QoL compared to an age-matched healthy population with significant impairment in physical and emotional functioning. Lung cancer surgery causes further deterioration of QoL, especially in the first 3 to 6 months after surgery. While some studies suggest that QOL returns to baseline levels at 6 to 9 months postoperatively, others report that QOL is still significantly impaired at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Age, extent of surgery, preoperative lung function, access technique, and adjuvant treatment may all influence postoperative QoL. This review presents the basic concepts of QoL research, several commonly used QoL measurement instruments, and a summary of the available data on post-lung cancer surgery QoL.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate quality of life (QoL) evolution after thoracic surgery for lung cancer with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire-C30 and the lung cancer specific module LC13. METHODS: A prospective QoL registration started in 2002 for all patients undergoing major pulmonary surgery for malignant disease. Between January 2002 and November 2004, 100 patients were included. Questionnaires were administered pre-operatively and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively (MPO) with response rates of 100%, 71%, 77%, 83% and 76%, respectively. PROCEDURES: lobectomy 61%, pneumonectomy 17%, and wedge resection 22%. Approaches: anterolateral thoracotomy 79%, posterolateral thoracotomy 13% and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) 8%. RESULTS: Lobectomy and wedge resection are comparable in QoL evolution. Both resections are characterized by a 1 month temporary decrease in QoL functioning scores and an increase in pain symptoms. Lobectomy patients report an increase in dyspnea in the first month post-operatively, not seen after wedge resection. With exception of thoracic pain after lobectomy, QoL scores approximated baseline values 3MPO indicating good recovery. After pneumonectomy, there is no return to baseline in physical functioning, role functioning, pain, shoulder function and dyspnea in a 12 months follow-up period. Other QoL scores were comparable with baseline values. Pneumonectomy was significantly associated with a less favorable QoL score evolution when compared with lobectomy. Comparing antero- and posterolateral thoracotomy, significant differences in pain and dyspnea were seen in favor of the anterolateral technique. Comparing thoracotomy to VATS, significant differences were seen in physical functioning, QoL and thoracic pain in favor of VATS. CONCLUSIONS: The present study documented QoL evolution profiles comparing pre-operative status with deficits and changes at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after pulmonary surgery. Lung cancer surgery is well tolerated by the majority of patients. Lobectomy patients have a more favorable physical functioning and less thoracic pain, compared to pneumonectomy. Antero- and posterolateral thoracotomy are comparable for QoL evolution. After posterolateral thoracotomy more post-operative pain and dyspnea was seen. Post-operative physical functioning, pain and QoL are in favor of VATS.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare gastric banding (GB) and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) with respect to the evolution of pyrosis and patient satisfaction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although weight loss is the most immediate end-point in the evaluation of surgical treatment of obesity, the demonstration of changes in long-term patient satisfaction and in co-morbidity, like reflux, is an essential outcome measure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 243 morbidly obese patients. All patients received a questionnaire regarding the evolution of pyrosis and their satisfaction after surgery. The evolution of pyrosis was compared between 2 patient groups who had different oesophagitis stages. Group A had oesophagitis I, or no oesophagitis, and group B had oesophagitis II, III or IV. RESULTS: In group A of the GB group 57.8% had no complaints, 11.1% had improvement and 22.2% had aggravation of the pyrosis. In group B of the GB group 50.0% had improvement. In group A of the VBG group 51.4% had no complaints, 11.1% improvement and 23.6% aggravation of the pyrosis. In group B of the VBG group 16.7% had no complaints, 66.6% had improvement and 16.7% had aggravation of the pyrosis complaints. Statistically there is no significant difference between GB and VBG. The experience after GB is good with 67.9%, mediocre with 25.0% and bad with 7.1% of the patients ; 60.7% is pleased with the weight loss. The experience after VBG is good with 47.4%, mediocre with 29.5% and bad with 23.1% of the patients. 52.6% is satisfied with the weight loss. CONCLUSION: VBG and GB have a similar effect on pyrosis. From our point of view it has been evidenced that the presence or absence of pyrosis before the operation is a possible predictor of the evolution afterwards. Long-term patient satisfaction is the same after GB and VBG. Other factors influence the satisfaction.