Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Comparison of Three Imaging Pathways for Suspected Midgut Volvulus in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To use time-driven activity-based costing to compare the costs of pathways for evaluating suspected pediatric midgut volvulus using either fluoroscopic upper gastrointestinal examination (UGI) or focused abdominal ultrasound (US). METHODS: Process maps were created through patient shadowing, medical record review, and frontline staff interviews. Using time-driven activity-based costing methodology, practical capacity cost rates were calculated for personnel, equipment, and facility costs. Supply costs were included at institutional purchase prices. The cost of each process substep was determined by multiplying step-specific capacity costs by the median time required for each step, and substep costs were summed to generate total pathway cost. Multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed applying minimum and maximum labor costs. Assuming UGI would be used to troubleshoot nondiagnostic US, a break-even analysis was performed to determine the cost impact of varying frequencies of UGI on the total cost of the US-based pathway. RESULTS: Process maps were created from 105 (48 girls, 57 boys) patient encounters. Base case pathway times were 90 min (UGI) and 55 min (US). Base case cost for UGI was $282.74 (range: $170.86-$800.82) when performed by a radiology practitioner assistant and $545.66 (range: $260.97-$1,974.06) when performed by a radiologist. Base case cost for US was $155.67 (range: $122.94-$432.29) when performed by a sonographer and $242.64 (range: $147.46-$1,330.05) when performed by a radiologist. For a US-based pathway, the total cost break-even pathway mix (percent UGI required for troubleshooting) was 57%. CONCLUSION: US can be a faster and less costly alternative to UGI in pediatric patients with suspected midgut volvulus.

Correction to: Comparative safety and efficacy of balloon use in air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception.

The original version on this paper contained an error. The names of M. John Hicks and R. Paul Guillerman, though correctly appeared in the published version, are incorrectly displayed in indexing sites.

Comparative safety and efficacy of balloon use in air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception.

BACKGROUND: Intussusception, a common cause of bowel obstruction in young children, is primarily treated with air enema reduction. There is little literature comparing the safety and efficacy of air reduction without or with a rectal balloon. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of a rectal balloon seal in air enema reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of children who underwent air reduction for ileocolic or ileo-ileocolic intussusception over an 8-year period. We sorted data from 566 children according to whether a rectal balloon was used in the reduction, and further sorted them by type and experience level of the practitioner. Using logistic regression analyses, we identified risk factors for iatrogenic bowel perforation or failed reduction. RESULTS: Significant associations with bowel perforation included balloon use (P=0.038), age <1 year (P<0.0001), and attending physician's level of experience <5 years (P=0.043). Younger age was associated with both perforation (P<0.0001) and procedural failure (P=0.001). The risk-adjusted predicted probability of perforation decreased with age, approaching zero by 10 months regardless of balloon use. For cases without bowel resection, the risk-adjusted predicted probability of failure decreased toward zero by 30 months with balloon use, while remaining constant at 3-12% regardless of age when not using a balloon. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of a successful air reduction might be safely increased by using an inflated rectal balloon in children older than 9 months. Use of a balloon in younger infants is associated with a higher risk of iatrogenic bowel injury.