Multicenter European Prevalence Study of Neurocognitive Impairment and Associated Factors in HIV Positive Patients.

We conducted a cross-sectional study in 448 HIV positive patients attending five European outpatient clinics to determine prevalence of and factors associated with neurocognitive impairment (NCI) using computerized and pen-and-paper neuropsychological tests. NCI was defined as a normalized Z score ≤-1 in at least 2 out of 5 cognitive domains. Participants' mean age was 45.8 years; 84% male; 87% white; 56% university educated; median CD4 count 550 cells/mm3; 89% on antiretroviral therapy. 156 (35%) participants had NCI, among whom 26 (17%; 5.8% overall) reported a decline in activities of daily living. Prevalence of NCI was lower in those always able to afford basic needs (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.94) or with a university education (aPR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97) and higher in those with severe depressive symptoms (aPR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09-2.14) or a significant comorbid condition (aPR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.90).

RESUMEN: Reportamos un estudio de tipo corte transversal que incluye 448 pacientes VIH seropositivos vistos en cinco clínicas especializadas en Europa con el objetivo de medir la prevalencia del trastorno neurocognitivo asociado al VIH (NCI por sus siglas en inglés) y los factores de riesgo asociados a éste. Se usaron pruebas neuropsicológicas computarizadas y en papel para determinar la presencia de NCI, definido como puntuación Z ≤ 1 en al menos 2 de los 5 dominios cognitivos evaluados. La media de edad de los pacientes fue 45,8 años, 84% eran hombres, 87% blancos y 56% tenían educación universitaria. La media de CD4 fue de 550 cel/mm3 y 89% de los pacientes recibían terapia antiretroviral. Un total de 156 (35%) participantes tenían NCI, de los cuales 26 (17%, 5,8% de la población de estudio) reportaron deterioro en actividades de la vida diaria. La prevalencia de NCI fue menor en participantes capaces de cubrir sus necesidades básicas (Razón de prevalencia ajustada [aPR] 0,71; Intervalo de confianza del 95% [95% CI] 0,54-0,94) o con educación universitaria (aPR 0,72; 95%CI 0,54-0,97) pero fue mayor en aquellos con síntomas de depresión severa (aPR 1,53; 95%CI 1,09-2,14) o alguna comorbilidad importante (aPR 1,40; 95%CI 1,03-1,90).

Central nervous system penetration-effectiveness rank does not reliably predict neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected individuals.

INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system (CNS) penetration-effectiveness (CPE) rank was proposed in 2008 as an estimate of penetration of ARV regimen into the CNS, and validated as predictor of CSF HIV-1 replication. RESULTS on predictive role of CPE on neurocognitive and clinical outcome were conflicting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of neurocognitive profile in HIV-infected cART-treated patients. All patients underwent neuropsychological (NP) assessment by standardized battery of 14 tests on 5 different domains. People were classified as having NCI if they scored >1 standard deviation (SD) below the normal mean in at least two tests, or >2 SD below in one test. Linear and logistic regression analyses were fitted using as outcome Npz8 and impaired/not impaired respectively. RESULTS: A total of 660 HIV-infected cART-treated individuals from 2009 to 2014, contributing a total of 1003 tests (mean age 49 (IQR 43-56), male 82%; median current CD4 586/mm(3); 18% HCV infected; HIV-RNA <40 cp/mL in 84%). Current ARV regimen was 2NRTIs+1NNRTI 50.3%, 2NRTI+1PI/r in 32.6%, NRTI sparing in 11.1%. Mean CPE of current regimens was 6.6 (95% CI 6.5-6.7). As per test multivariable analysis, higher CPE values were associated to poor NP tasks (Beta=-0,09; 95% CI -0,14 -0,03; p=0.002 at multivariable linear regression). The association between higher CPE and increased NCI risk was confirmed at multivariable logistic regression, with a 1.24-fold risk of NCI occurrence for each point increase of CPE of current regimen at the time of NP testing (see Table 1). In a sensitivity analysis performed only on patients at the first NP test, the association between higher CPE and poor NP tasks and enhanced NCI risk was only marginally confirmed (Beta=-0,05; [-0,12-0,02]; p=0,19; OR 1,13 [0,95-1,34]; p=0.17). Older age, longer time from HIV diagnosis, current CD4 count <350 cell/mm(3) and lower education level were all associated to an increased risk of NCI. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis, higher CPE rank is associated to poorly performing at NP tasking. Even if selection bias could not be excluded due to retrospective cross-sectional design, these results fitted with the direct correlation between high CPE and HIV dementia recently recorded in a large observational database. We think that CPE use to guide ART in patients neurocognitively impaired should be revised.

APRI and FIB-4 scores are not associated with neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected persons.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic liver disease leads to neurocognitive impairment (NCI) and more advanced liver fibrosis is associated with greater deficits. Further, cognitive performances do not differ significantly among patients affected by diverse types of chronic liver diseases. Thus, it would be useful to have a clinical tool associated with early cognitive change applicable to the HIV-infected population with high HCV prevalence. Aim of the analysis was to assess the association between NCI and aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI) or Fibrosis-4, which are non-invasive scores used to assess liver fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of cART-treated HIV-infected patients undergoing neuropsychological assessment (NPA) by a set of 14 standardized and comprehensive tests on five different domains: concentration and speed of mental processing; mental flexibility; memory, fine motor functioning; visual-spatial and constructional abilities. NPA obtained from the same patient were included, if collected while receiving different cART. Patients were classified as having NCI, if they scored >1 SD below the normative mean in at least two tests, or below >2 SD in one test. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) were classified according to Frascati's criteria, controlling for confounding comorbidities. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were carried out. RESULTS: A total of 556 HIV-infected cART-treated patients from 2006 to 2013 were included: male 78%; IVDUs 14%; CDC stage C 31%; median CD4 nadir 200/mm(3); median current CD4 501/mm(3); undetectable HIV-RNA in 368 (67%); and HCV-positivity in 150 (29%). Frequency among score levels was for FIB-4: min-1.44=404 (73%), 1.45-3.25=118 (21%), 3.26-max=28 (5%); for APRI: min-0.5=414 (75%), 0.5-1.5=112 (20%), 1.5-max=24 (4%). Median FIB-4 and APRI were 0.98 and 0.27 in HIV+/HCV- and 1.40 and 0.50 in HIV+/HCV+ individuals, respectively. HAND was found in 176 (32%): 91 ANI, 73 MND, 12 HAD. Association of variables with NCI are shown in Table 1. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population, HAND was not associated with commonly used non-invasive liver fibrosis scores. As aetiology of cognitive dysfunction in HIV mono- and HCV co-infected patients is multifactorial and partially unknown, our results support the hypothesis of a direct or indirect effect on cognitive function of the viruses, rather than the consequence of alterations residing outside the brain.

Changes in cognition during antiretroviral therapy: comparison of 2 different ranking systems to measure antiretroviral drug efficacy on HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Although HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders should be treated with highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) regimens with good central nervous system (CNS) penetration, the definition of neuroactive HAART remains controversial. We compared 2 ranking systems to measure HAART neuroeffectiveness. METHODS: Patients with (n = 93) or at risk for (n = 92) HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders underwent neuropsychological (NP) test batteries before HAART initiation and at follow-up. Changes in normatively adjusted summary NP test z scores were calculated for each subject. Two neuropenetration scores were calculated: the central nervous system penetration reference score (number of drugs in the combination among zidovudine, abacavir, stavudine, lamivudine, efavirenz, nevirapine, indinavir, and lopinavir-ritonavir) and the CNS penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score: a summary score of 1 (high: penetration: [corrected] zidovudine, abacavir, delavirdine, [corrected] nevirapine, amprenavir-ritonavir, fosamprenavir-ritonavir, [corrected] indinavir-ritonavir, and lopinavir-ritonavir), 0.5 (intermediate penetration: [corrected] stavudine, lamivudine, emtricitabine, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir, [corrected] atazanavir-ritonavir, atazanavir, [corrected] and indinavir), and 0 (low penetration: remaining ARVs) [corrected] for each drug in the combination. Main outcome measures were changes in global NPZ scores and in summary z scores on 5 domains. RESULTS: At regression analyses, higher CPE scores correlated with greater improvements in NPZ-4 (P = 0.0283), NPZ-8 (P = 0.0071), concentration and speed of mental processing (P = 0.0046), and mental flexibility (P = 0.0262) summary z scores. The correlation was stronger among NP-impaired patients. By contrast, higher estimates of neuroeffectiveness with the alternative system showed no correlation. No association was seen between CD4 and plasma viral load changes with both scores. CONCLUSIONS: The CPE score represents a step forward toward the identification of a clinically useful approach to estimating HAART ability to improve cognition.

Persistence of neuropsychologic deficits despite long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-related neurocognitive impairment: prevalence and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: Although highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can reverse HIV-related neurocognitive impairment (NCI), neuropsychologic (NP) deficits may persist in a substantial proportion of patients despite antiretroviral treatment. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of persistent NP deficits despite long-term HAART in patients with HIV-related NCI. METHODS: A group of 94 patients with HIV-related NCI underwent 2 to 7 serial NP batteries, neurologic examination, and brain imaging studies. Patients received HAART for a mean of 63 (range: 6-127) months. According to NP assessment results, patients were considered to have reversible or persistent NP deficits. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze time to first evidence of NP deficit reversion. RESULTS: Persistent NP deficits were observed in 59 (62.8%) patients. Age, gender, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stage, risk category, CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, and use of central nervous system-penetrating drugs were not associated with persistent NP deficits. By contrast, patients with persistent NP deficits were less educated and showed poorer baseline performances in NP measures exploring concentration and speed of mental processing, memory, and mental flexibility. In multivariable analyses, only the baseline severity of NCI, as measured by the composite NPZ8 global score (odds ratio = 3.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.54 to 6.08; P = 0.001) remained significantly associated with persistent NP deficits. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of NCI at HAART initiation seems to be the strongest predictor of persistent NP deficits despite long-term HAART. Our data indicate that HAART should be initiated as soon as NCI is diagnosed to avoid potentially irreversible neurologic damage.

Neuroactive antiretroviral drugs do not influence neurocognitive performance in less advanced HIV-infected patients responding to highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of antiretroviral therapy, including drugs that have good penetration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), on neuropsychologic performance. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five HIV-1-infected patients exposed to a stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen were studied. Neuropsychologic examinations were performed for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 50.3% of patients were impaired. In multivariate analysis, older age (for 10-year increase, odds ratio [OR] = 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2 to 10.4; P< 0.0001) and higher plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.2; P = 0.021) at testing were independently associated with an increased probability of impaired neurocognitive performance, whereas higher educational level was a protective factor (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.90; P=0.001). A significant linear correlation was observed between the neuropsychologic z score for 8 tests (NPZ8) score, a quantitative parameter of neurocognitive impairment, and CD4 cell count at neuropsychologic testing (R = 0.273, P = 0.001) and between the NPZ8 score and the patient's age (R = 0.288, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the use of stable HAART, including multiple drugs that have good CSF penetration, was not associated with neuropsychologic performance. To prevent independent replication of HIV in CSF with better control of a relevant reservoir of HIV is one of the crucial aims of therapeutic strategy.

Neurocognitive impairment and survival in a cohort of HIV-infected patients treated with HAART.

Before the introduction of HAART, HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment (NCI) was recognized as an independent risk factor for death. Since 1996, we conducted a prospective study to assess whether NCI still represents a negative prognostic factor for mortality. Patients were administered measures of neurocognitive function (a battery of 17 neuropsychological tests), clinical and neurological evaluation, laboratory testing, and brain imaging studies. Among the 412 enrolled patients, 224 (54.4%) were neurocognitively impaired and 188 (45.6%) were neurocognitively unimpaired. A durable virological suppression under highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was achieved by 63.3% of unimpaired patients and by 49.6% of impaired patients (p = 0.007). Overall, 47 deaths were recorded, 38 among impaired and 9 among unimpaired patients. At 84 months, the estimated survival proportions in impaired and unimpaired patients were 68.5% and 84.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). At univariate analysis the virological response to HAART was the variable most strongly associated with survival, since patients with virological failure had a nearly 10-fold increased risk of death than those with durable virological suppression (HR = 9.9, 95% CI: 3.9-25.0). After stratification for virological response to HAART, an increased risk of death for neurocognitively impaired patients was seen only among the 182 patients with virological failure (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-7.1), while the survival probability of the 230 patients with durable virological suppression was not affected by neurocognitive impairment (p = 0.89). Our results highlight the clinical relevance of HIV-related central nervous system (CNS) involvement in the HAART era, and raise concerns regarding the clinical relevance of CNS involvement as potent antiretroviral therapies become less effective.

Prevalence and risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurocognitive impairment, 1996 to 2002: results from an urban observational cohort.

To assess prevalence and risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related neurocognitive impairment (NCI), the authors performed a 7-year survey in the period 1996 to 2002. A total of 432 patients were examined. HIV-related NCI was diagnosed in 238 patients (55.1%), meeting the HIV dementia (HIV-D) criteria in 45 (10.4%). The prevalence of both NCI and HIV-D did not change significantly during the study period. Compared with patients without NCI, patients with NCI were older (40.4 versus 38.2 years; P = .003), had a higher prevalence of positive HCV serology (61.1% versus 38.9%; P = .003), and a lower nadir CD4 cell count (156 versus 222 cells/microl; P < .001). Compared with patients seen during 1996 to 1999, patients with NCI seen during 2000 to 2002 were older (40.7 versus 38.8 years; P = .004), had a less advanced disease stage (previous acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [AIDS] 28.8% versus 65.7%; P < .001) and a higher nadir CD4 count (174 versus 132 cells/microl; P = .026). This study showed an unchanged prevalence of both HIV-related NCI and HIV-D in the period 1996 to 2002. The authors found evidences for new additional potential risk factors for HIV-related NCI (older age, lower nadir CD4 count, positive hepatitis C virus [HCV] serology), and for a change of risk factors for NCI in the late highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era (older age, less advanced disease, higher nadir CD4 count).

Neurocognitive performance and quality of life in patients with HIV infection.

We examined the relationship of HIV-related cognitive impairment and health-related quality of life (QoL). Subjects were administered measures of cognitive function (a battery of 17 neuropsychological tests) and of QoL (the MOS-HIV questionnaire). Study measures also included comprehensive clinical and neurological evaluation, laboratory testing, and brain imaging studies in patients with impaired neuropsychological evaluation. One-hundred and eleven subjects were examined. Cognitively impaired patients (33.3%) reported poorer QoL scores in all domains (p < 0.05): physical health summary score (PHS) (44.6 vs. 49.9), mental health summary score (MHS) (37.7 vs. 44.4), pain (67.6 vs. 79.4), physical functioning (75.9 vs. 87.7), role functioning (32.4 vs. 41.5), social functioning (70.3 vs. 83.5), mental health (48.2 vs. 61.0), energy (53.1 vs. 63.0), health distress (60.8 vs. 75.5), cognitive functioning (CF) (60.5 vs. 71.8), general health perceptions (29.2 vs. 43.4), and QoL (36.5 vs. 47.0). The number of altered neuropsychological tests correlated significantly with MHS (p < 0.001), PHS (p < 0.03), CF (p < 0.02), and QoL (p < 0.02) scores. A correlation between seven of seven neuropsychological measures exploring speed of mental processing, three of four exploring mental flexibility, four of six exploring memory, and two of two exploring fine motor functioning and MHS, PHS, CF, or QoL scores was also found. Poor performance on the Digit Symbol test was most strongly associated with poor MHS (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p < 0.009) and PHS (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p < 0.01) scores, controlling for CD4 count, previous AIDS diagnosis, receiving HAART, and drug abuse. Cognitive impairment is associated with poor QoL. People with more severe cognitive impairment have the highest probability of having a poor QoL. Cognitive impairment in any cognitive domain explored in our battery is also associated with poor QoL. Poor performance on the Digit Symbol Test is the strongest predictor of poor QoL.