Clinical value of right hemicolectomy for appendiceal carcinoids using pathologic criteria.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal carcinoids (AC) are usually adequately treated by appendectomy. The European Neuroendocrine Tumours Society (ENETS) has recently reconsidered the previous pathologic criteria to identify patients at high risk of extra-appendiceal disease, who are thought to require right hemicolectomy (RHC). AIM: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate previous and currently introduced criteria, in identifying patients with AC in whom RHC is justified. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent RHC for AC were retrospectively identified. Demographic and follow-up data were collected and appendectomy specimens were reviewed for the presence of indications leading to RHC defined as: tumor diameter ≥2 cm, tumor location at the base, mesoappendiceal extension, mitotic index Ki-67≥2%. RHC specimens were examined to identify evidence of extra-appendiceal disease, remaining and/or metastatic disease. RESULTS: Four patients fulfilled two criteria and 8 one criterion for RHC. Two patients had tumors ≥2.0 cm, 5 located at the base, 8 invading the mesoappendix and periappendiceal fat; Ki-67 PI was 1% in all cases measured except one, in which it was 3%. Post-RHC, 3 patients (25%) had extra-appendiceal disease (no residual disease was identified in surgical margins); 1 had tumor at the colon specimen and 2 had lymph node metastasis. All 3 patients fulfilled only one pathologic criterion; 1 had tumor mesoappendiceal extension and 2 tumor location at the base of the appendix. CONCLUSIONS: Applying previous and currently introduced pathologic criteria, 25% of high-risk patients with AC had identifiable extra-appendiceal disease following RHC that might be not detected following the recently introduced ENETS criteria.

Hypophysitis superimposed on a non-functioning pituitary adenoma: diagnostic clinical, endocrine, and radiologic features.

Pituitary adenomas are common neoplasms requiring medical and/or surgical treatment when associated with hormonal hypersecretion. Treatment of non-functioning pituitary adenomas is necessary when symptoms of mass effect or hormonal deficits occur. However, therapeutic options, including surgical resection and/or radiotherapy, can be associated with significant complications. Hence, it is important to consider disorders that could present in a similar manner to pituitary adenomas, for which surgery is not the indicated therapeutic approach. We describe herein a 38-yr-old woman who presented with a pituitary lesion that was considered to be a non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Due to lack of hormonal deficits and/or compression of adjacent structures, we opted for conservative management and followup with consecutive magnetic resonance imaging. Fifteen months after initial diagnosis, considerable enlargement of the lesion was noted, extending mainly superiorly and indenting the optic chiasm. Repeated endocrine investigation revealed partial anterior pituitary insufficiency. The patient underwent trans-sphenoidal resection of the pituitary lesion; histology revealed a null cell pituitary adenoma and lymphocytic hypophysitis (LYH) of the non-neoplastic adenohypophysial gland. Post-operatively, complete anterior and partial posterior pituitary insufficiency developed. This case illustrates the effects of new-onset LYH in a patient with a pre-existing non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Being aware of this rare possibility is important, as enlargement of the pituitary lesion may not be caused by expansion of the preexisting tumor, but by the onset of LYH of the nonneoplastic pituitary tissue.